Page MenuHomePhabricator

Helpful vs. Useful
Open, LowestPublic

Description

What's the difference between this to status in Article Feedback v5 messages? They seem synonyms to me.

Etc. See https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Thread:Translating_talk:MediaWiki/Helpful_vs._Useful

Event Timeline

Nemo_bis raised the priority of this task from to Lowest.
Nemo_bis updated the task description. (Show Details)
Nemo_bis added projects: ArticleFeedbackv5, I18n.
Nemo_bis subscribed.
Aklapper claimed this task.

AFTv5 is dead; closing as wontfix/declined.

SamanthaNguyen moved this task from Backlog to i18n on the ArticleFeedbackv5 board.
SamanthaNguyen subscribed.

AFTv5 is back and maintained by Brickimedia developers instead now (see T146253), so reopening this.

Very confusing indeed. :-/

tl,dr: helpful = upvoted by users; useful = marked as useful via the AFTv5 special page by a wiki editor or admin or someone with the sufficient privileges (probably just aft-reader or aft-editor)

So by default when you're privileged enough to "act" on feedback posts, you see a "View reader feedback" link on Talk: pages. Clicking on that takes you to a page like Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/Main_Page?ref=talk&filter=featured -- note the filter=featured part: this ensures that only posts from the "featured" queue are shown to users who follow that link.

Looking at the English i18n file, the confusion only gets worse:
"logentry-articlefeedbackv5-feature": "$1 {{GENDER:$2|marked}} [[$3|feedback post #$4]] as useful on [[$5]]",
The message key contains the word "feature" but the text shown to the user uses the word "useful"; and of course there's a separate message for the helpful case (which, pardon the pun, helpfully uses the same word in both the message key and the user-facing UI text).

Likewise, "unhelpful" feedback is just feedback with downvotes, nothing fancier.