I'll go through it, hopefully in the next few days, and do a more thorough review of the generated list, and then I'll copy the relevant words to the "Bad" and "Informal" lists. I'll make sure to leave "hamster" out. ;)

In T131855#2183407, @Halfak wrote:

Looks like we're ready to go: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Word_lists/no

@Galar71, could you review the "generated list" and split it into "badwords" and "informal words"? You can ignore the "common words" for now.

In T127058#2173452, @Halfak wrote:

So far, ORES doesn't have the basic models set up for nowiki yet. There is a Wiki labels campaign for getting training data though. See https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiketter So far, we have 881/5000 edits labeled. See http://labels.wmflabs.org/campaigns/nowiki/27/?campaign=stats

Yeah, I guess I mean the ORES... I get an error message in Huggle that scoring is not enabled, so I'm assuming that's what I'm referring to...

To quality, I'm talking about no.wikipedia.org, that does not have scoring enabled.