my mistake, this is a duplicate of T260043 which I vreated earlier

Note https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/reasonator/issues/47/incorporate-wikispore-information and that T231899 is now resolved.

Note that the secondary one, spore: was subsequently removed due to a couple of Wikipedia article conflicts.

Are the icon and the wordmark supposed to be of certain dimensions? Are we looking for something other than literally just taking a horizontal cut of the scissors to the old SVG?

I mean specifically the Greenhouse is in the main namespace, and I kind of like it there, but we don't want the sig button on every main namespace page.

Is there a way to do this just on a specific page or a handful of pages, not on a whole namespace?

Is there a reason why incubator: doesn't work? This is sort of our twin wiki in the movement, so would be helpful to compare Main Pages, etc.

It does appear in a Google search now, but looks a bit clunky:

Is this viable now that T239660 is resolved?

In T255311#6222733, @Aklapper wrote:

Could you please send an email (to ca at wikimedia dot org) from your registered email address of your wiki account, in order to confirm? Please also include the URL of this ticket in your email.

In T255311#6221353, @Aklapper wrote:

@Pharos: 2FA where? Which website(s) is this about?

In T255046#6212132, @bd808 wrote:

Sounds like roughly the same goal that the matrix project has (T193964). Maybe y'all could collaborate there rather than starting a new project? This is an area that @Tgr has long been interested in.

In T254590#6199495, @Zblace wrote:

I saw you used subdomains for Wikispore.org

@Zblace Wait, are you asking about a subdomain, or just about a namespace?

Maybe we should add one additional custom interwiki shortcut, to the Wikispore test wiki, presumably test:

@Amire80 substantially improved by importing https://wikispore.wmflabs.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.css from English Wikipedia

Would be wonderful if we could have player conversations too, either by chat, or even better by video like Wikimedia Meet.

There are 6 cards in a hand and 80+ cards in a deck. I believe @Spiritia has used a double deck at Wikimania. The recommended number of players is 3-6, but we've done more. Maybe we could query various decks based on GLAM collection or SPARQL query.

As to restricting access, what if we say that every Wikimedia chapter or usergroup has the right to use the tool, and can give access to host calls to 5 of its designated members? I could help administer a process for this on meta.

In T231897#5935369, @Koavf wrote:

To be clear, this request would allow us to still have standard running text MediaWiki pages on Wikispore and not convert it into a Wikidata-style database, correct?

@Tgr I think we've completed everything related to this? I've used it effectively in merging the various spam accounts, and also in renaming @Koavf 's account.

@Tgr This is done now, right?

@Tgr has installed some anti-spam extensions on https://wikispore-test.wmflabs.org/ now, and they seem to be working great to me.

@jeremyb Let's set this up together when you're free.

This is different from T231989, which is about getting an interwiki shortcut from WMF sites to Wikispore.

You can see what this looks like now at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:World_AIDS_Day_2019

Done!

@Amire80 suggested the issue was possibly CSS., either missing CSS code from TemplateStyles or from Common.css. What do you think, @jeremyb @Tgr ?

@Sannita has some ideas relevant to this, detailed at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sannita/Sandbox

I guess noone objects to changing behavior in case of MassMessage? I would rather not wait another year for this, let's agree to just do that part.

Would it be possible to just make a quick exception for MassMessage for now? Then we can figure out later if the limitation makes sense in general for unsigned additions.

Best would be to have custom behavior if it's from the MassMessage bot, with no pointless authour information, and the section header in the title of the email. (so people know what the message is about before clicking).

In T218724#5657896, @Bawolff wrote:

So testing locally, it looks like it only includes the section header in the email alert if it detects a signature.

In T231898#5649726, @Tgr wrote:

SpecialNamespaces has been installed, and we have a runbook on how to use it. Can we resolve this task or should we keep it for tracking actually adding some namespaces?

In T231903#5649770, @Tgr wrote:

This is blocked on T231899: Wikidata property, right?

Can we create it this week? This will be a vital tool in building up community discussion and participation, and we want to do a kind of public launch for the project at a wikiconference in November.