The main question would be: How/Where do we want to fix that?

Could this be implemented in CommunityConfiguration with the functionality described in T358221: Add support for displaying grouped configurations / T358335: Allow to display informational sections in the editor or is there something else missing?

LibUp is working as expected again. Per T363348, it is not creating an update-commit if libraries ready to be updated are not yet important enough to merit their own commit.

In T363348#9741122, @taavi wrote:

The weight configured for php-parallel-lint is low enough that LibUp will only push that when there's something else to update with it.

This seems to have gotten somewhat fixed?

Not sure I understand everything in precise detail yet, but I think I can provide a quick first draft that should allow for further discussion.

In T361933#9728493, @Etonkovidova wrote:

In T361933#9727431, @Michael wrote:

@Michael - the task description says:

Within this task, we should also remove the apostrophes.

The apostrophes are still present in the title when he form is edited

Can be seen on https://es.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Especial:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthHomepage?uselang=en

Rename WikiPageConfigProvider to a more descriptive name (possibly MediaWikiConfigProvider? or something similar?)

Interestingly, test2-wiki sees to be not affected: https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges

In T362618#9718814, @MoritzMuehlenhoff wrote:

Can you try accessing https://idp.wikimedia.org/logout and then retrying a login to https://idp.wikimedia.org/? You might have still had an SSO session with your previous memberships.

I now have Gerrit +2 rights again, but sadly, I still cannot access Logstash or log in to Grafana:

At some point in the past, it was changed so that (new?) quantities do not have +-1 uncertainty by default.

I think this has been fixed since then. Otherwise, please reopen if you still notice this issue.

This task is somewhat between components...

I'm adding this to the Lua board, even though it technically is not about Lua, but still about accessing data from the client within the content of an article, so close enough.

I'm adding this to the Lua board, even though it technically is not about Lua, but still about accessing data from the client within the content of an article, so close enough.

I wonder if this has some overlap with T253387?

This probably could use some more context. Why do we want to find out how mw.wikibase.getEntity is used? Is this mainly to understand how an expensive function is used in order to maybe optimize that, or is there another motivation?

Marking it as high, because this both feels like it might be related to the source of some of the bugs we're seeing, as well as this might blow up / completely break / become a blocker to further parser work at some point.

This might be related to T354647, so I'm adding that as a subtask.