In T124716#1982114, @Nuria wrote:

FYI that top articles display a lot of automated traffic (we have an item to work on that) so you might need to do some client side filtering for "nonsensical" results.

In T124716#1981411, @BGerstle-WMF wrote:

@Slaporte do you have any ideas for how the apps should handle this? How did top.hatnote.com determine which date to fetch top 100 for? For example, going to http://top.hatnote.com/ today (Jan 29) shows yesterday's (Jan 28) top 100.

In T124225#1949704, @JEumerus wrote:

If detection of non-free images is a concern, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_non-free_media is a category that is set up (not sure if required by policy, but in practice always observed to my understanding) to list all non-free media on enwiki.

In T123636#1939368, @DarTar wrote:

@mattflaschen wonderful.

One of the hashtags is inside a link; I can change that if it won't work. Also, for future reference, I am assuming this is not case-sensitive. Correct me if I'm wrong.

@Slaporte can you comment on this?

In T44259#1927300, @JAllemandou wrote:

In T44259#1918132, @Slaporte wrote:

when is pageview data from the previous day published? I noticed that data from January 5 isn't available yet (unless I'm doing something wrong) 17 hours since UTC midnight.

@Slaporte: We have experienced a cluster issue 2016 Jan 4th which slowed down our computation for the next two days. Everything is now back in order.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

I'll take a look.

@Milimetric, when is pageview data from the previous day published? I noticed that data from January 5 isn't available yet (unless I'm doing something wrong) 17 hours since UTC midnight.

In T119686#1833083, @Tgr wrote:

CC-ing WMF-Legal. Example of old credit line is:
"Iglesia de San Pedro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 11-12 HDR" by Diego Delso. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iglesia_de_San_Pedro,_Teruel,_Espa%C3%B1a,_2014-01-10,_DD_11-12_HDR.JPG#/media/File:Iglesia_de_San_Pedro,_Teruel,_Espa%C3%B1a,_2014-01-10,_DD_11-12_HDR.JPG
Example of suggested credit line is:
By Diego Delso, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=35074221
Do you see a problem with that change?

Hi @Addshore, could you add a line to the Legal Notice page explaining that the site is hosted on Wikimedia Labs, subject to the Labs Terms of Use. Other than that, the site appears to comply with the Terms of Use and I see no legal issue setting up the domain name.

In T114016#1761606, @Aklapper wrote:

In T114016#1757849, @Slaporte wrote:

Yes, Mark Monitor renewed the domain.

@Slaporte: Thanks for the update!
Is there anything left to do in this task, or do you plan to set "Change Status > Resolved" in the "Action" dropdown of this task?

Yes, Mark Monitor renewed the domain.

This is OK with legal. Thanks!

@Dzahn, @BBlack, this document is hereby declared master: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nmu60y1gkvc9NrvG0uPCS4wI9jfdCJIvwXVEv8UE00Y/edit#gid=1638386207

@Dzahn That's fine with me.

We can keep these parked until we plan to use them. Thanks!

In T101048#1697267, @BBlack wrote:

In T101048#1694267, @Slaporte wrote:

Do we have / can we produce a list of all domains registered to us globally, with any registrar, and get them into our DNS servers so that they're not Lame Delegations anymore?

I can get this list. What's the best format for you (just a big CSV)?

If we can start with this (really CSV or any format is fine, I can convert from there), I can go build us a table with the status of them all, including which are currently in what technical state at the DNS and apache redirect level, etc.

Do we have / can we produce a list of all domains registered to us globally, with any registrar, and get them into our DNS servers so that they're not Lame Delegations anymore?

Got it. That makes a lot of sense.

@RobH is there a less expensive way to do a simple redirect?

We've acquired wikipedia.es through a trademark enforcement action.

We now have wiki.voyage. SRE, can you set up DNS to redirect to wikivoyage.org?

We now have wikipedia.lol registered. SRE, can you configure the domain to redirect to wikipedia.org?

We now have w.wiki, m.wiki, and a large number of two-letter language code .wiki domains:

@scfc, I'm curious which user groups can see the data in querycache/querycachetwo through MediaWiki. Are any of these special pages restricted to admins? Can you post/link to a list of special pages that are in the table?

In T113324#1686302, @RobH wrote:

As such, would @Slaporte be the manager to approve this access expansion as well?

Approved.

I'll confirm with Mark Monitor that this is taken care of.

In T94239#1158916, @bd808 wrote:

It's a derivative of unlicensed code that was lifted from operations/puppet :(

I'd be glad to license my contributions under any OSI license with a preference for MIT or Apache2.

Thanks, Kaldari. I'll follow up with Max offline and then let you know.

We are in the process of transferring the domain. I'll confirm or renew.

@pizzzacat: if you need legal to review for a survey conducted by WMF, please email me directly and we can vet Google Forms or Live Survey. Thanks!

This is all set up: policy.wikimedia.org

C-level can approve by email if they do not have a phabricator account.

In T110203#1572039, @Dzahn wrote:

In T110203#1571999, @Slaporte wrote:

No need to migrate any content. It's a new site under development.

Well, we were told back in April it's gonna be static HTML content and since then we've been waiting to upload that. So at some point that has to be created?

Where is the content? Will any content on our cluster need to be migrated or maintained by operations?

@Dzahn, that's right. The site will be hosted with our blog WordPress instance.

Let me know what you need. Thanks!

Hi @Krenair, the site will be hosted by WordPress (similar to the Wikimedia blog). What is the process to get an appropriate certificate issued?

Looks good to me, too. Thanks!

The process for Board members is documented in the Board Handbook on Meta Wiki.

That's awesome, you are one step ahead of me. Thanks!

Hi Rob, one additional question -- is it possible to add an alias from Advocacy_Advisors@ to publicpolicy@, to avoid any dropped mail due to an out of date address book?

Thanks! I've changed the account email, so it's all set up now.

Hi @Dzahn, this is part of the standard offboarding process for Board members, and we have discussed this with Sam as well.

There are no legal problem deploying this Maps service. I'll share more details via email, and please follow up with me directly if you have any questions. Thanks!

We should include this minimal disclaimer to the layer choice interface:

In T108099#1512511, @Krenair wrote:

We also need to simultaneously update the contact form on Meta for user group applications, which sends mail to this list (see T95789).

It just sends to the email address of the 'Usergroups' wiki user. You should be able to change the address, assuming you still have/remember the password or have access to the email address currently associated with it.

The registrar confirmed that this is resolved. Thanks!

I spoke with @Mholloway and @Vibhabamba about using an icon to explain the license for the background photo, and this design is legally allowed. I'm happy to share more details by email if you need further clarification on the advice. Thanks!

Hi @Dzahn, this is what I got from the registrar:

@bearND: We can use the CC icon to indicate that the full card may be freely shared.

@Vibhabamba: will do. Thanks for posting the chart.

@Aklapper: We should add URLs for CC BY-SA 3.0 and GPL v2 to the footer, although both of these links are also currently available if you read through the Terms of Use. This patch is sufficient if you can't add links in the text of the footer.

In T101436#1362464, @Mholloway wrote:

@Slaporte, I think it might be good for us to touch base on this as well if you have some time next week.

This is approved.

In T99443#1294504, @JohnLewis wrote:

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/usergroups already exists, requested by AffCom through @Slaporte in ticket T89149.

In T98676#1288075, @greg wrote:

In T98676#1274501, @Slaporte wrote:

I'll check the policy and get back to you here.

Just confirming: @Slaporte: you're all good here?

@AddisWang: Can you talk with your group about your preferred subdomain that includes the word "user group" in some form? I would like user groups to use a pattern similar to "chinausergroup.wikimedia.org" (or abbreviated), to avoid confusion or overlap with other groups. Thanks!

@Dzahn, I confirmed that @ZhouZ is an employee and under NDA. He will need to access WMF-NDA as part of his work.

In T98676#1274406, @Krenair wrote:

I know we create wikis for chapters, but user groups? I'm not sure. @Slaporte, is there a policy for this or should we get affcom's input, or...?

I'll check the policy and get back to you here.

In T85141#1256595, @JohnLewis wrote:

Still pending an approval form @Slaporte (or anyone else from legal who deals with data release).

@bd808, I adjusted the list settings to accept emails from the form.

I posted a note on attribution and CC compliance for this feature on MediaWiki.

In T91811#1217633, @Deskana wrote:

I've edited the description to remove incorrect information. WMF-Legal has confirmed that the logos on the cards are accurate because the legal facts of the situation are that the cards themselves are under CC BY-SA irrespective of whether there is fair use material used in them. They also confirmed that there are no legal issues with the current implementation.

This task is purely about attribution to conform to some other, non-legal standards for attribution.

In T95789#1212059, @Krenair wrote:

@Slaporte: What user do we want these to send to?

This is looking good!

Hi @Krenair, thanks for working on this!

In T95789#1203325, @bd808 wrote:

Getting the wiki page that I took the mock screen shot from moved to a non-private wiki would be optimal so that the desired messages are cut-n-paste friendly rather than needing to be retyped by a developer. @Slaporte can you be responsible for doing that and then linking the wiki page here on the task?

In T91966#1185456, @Rubin16 wrote:

In T91966#1178156, @Jalexander wrote:

Hi Rubin, WMHU has an agreement with the foundation to do so. This is the big thing, you need to get legal approval, neither Peter or I can give that. I'll try and poke Stephen Laporte today to take a look here.

Hi! Are there any new details about that?

In T95007#1191972, @Deskana wrote:

Did this get Legal signoff in the end? Just double-checking since that's not documented in this card.

@greg do you prefer CC BY over CC0 for these sort of docs?

In T93994#1153246, @Anomie wrote:

The bulk of the content of the help page comes from i18n messages, effectively via translatewiki. What's the license deal there?

The names of the modules, parameters, and values are the only bits that don't, but I doubt the bare names of these things are copyrightable.

Got it. Thanks!