Question: I am trying to compare this https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Interwiki_linking and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Links#Interwiki_links . How do we know which information is missing since the content on both pages is not the same?

Hi @Tabah-B, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! Can you include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project?

Hi @Mhmohona, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I really like the detail you put into your proposal, especially in the schedule. I also appreciate that you added a stretch goal to develop a maintenance process. I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.

I'm moving your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal. Thanks!

Just wanted to +1 this task and say that I encounter this issue a lot

I think “REST API module” is ok, contrasting with “Action API module” and “ResourceLoader module”. I also like “API group” or “API endpoint group”. It’s boring (in a good way), and I think it introduces the least amount of ambiguity.

In T362573#9716217, @Sahil-tgs wrote:

Hi @apaskulin , thank you for the feedback. I have updated the statement to include my availability for the project, which is approximately 25-30 hours per week. I'm flexible and can adjust my schedule based on the project's needs, ensuring that deadlines are met, and tasks are completed efficiently. Looking forward to your review!

In T358821#9716223, @NidhiParab wrote:

I have made the changes. I have added the minimum numbers of hours I'll be available.

In T358605#9716587, @Network-charles wrote:

I initially specified 30 hours per week due to the guidance provided by Google, but I realized that it was not enough so I adjusted it to 40 hours per week.

In T359008#9716608, @Ibom99 wrote:

Hi @apaskulin, I have updated my statement of interest to include the number of available working hours per week on this project (30 hours per week).

Thanks for opening this, @Tacsipacsi! I think this is a good idea and would simply the theme code that allows some specific keyword literals.

Version 1.0.0 has now been released! A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this! Further improvements will be tracked outside this task.

Fixed in v1.0.0 by enabling the betterlinks plugin, with the exception of the link on https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/js/module-mediawiki.storage.html which is tracked by T362427: Phabricator links processed twice

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0

Released as part of v1.0.0 and documented on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/JSDoc#Plugins

Released as part of v1.0.0

In T360083#9715902, @Agatevureglory wrote:

Hi @apaskulin I have added my available weekly working hours to my personal information section—40 hours per week.

Hi @user_123, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project? Thanks!

Hi @NidhiParab, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project? Thanks!

Hi @Agatevureglory, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!

Hi @Ibom99, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!

Hi @Network-charles, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!

Hi @Sahil-tgs, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I really like the emphasis on usability and communication. Before I move your proposal into the reviewed column, can you include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project?

@TheDJ We ended up having to fork the summarize plugin from JSDoc to get class description summaries to work correctly, so if you want to apply the fix from your upstream pull request, the forked plugin is in plugins/summarize.js

This is now ready for review from the team. Does the proposal sound good? Is there anything else we should consider or include?

This is now ready for review from the team. Does the proposal sound good? Is there anything else we should consider or include?

The PR to update goodbot was merged, and it seems that the GSoC changes were resolved. It seems that goodbot is still waiting on some fixes, but I think we can close this

Noting that there was a recent response on https://github.com/wikimedia/WikiContrib/issues/294

Hi @Apoorv-Nsut, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! Can you update your proposal to include how you would approach the project and any changes to the scope, timeline, or goals that you'd suggest?

Hi @Chrissy_Codes, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I appreciate the research and background information you've included in your proposal. I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.

Thank you! I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.