In T190786#4084954, @Tgr wrote:

Thanks @Guycn2! Do you want to write a patch for it?

Thanks for fixing.

In T146393#2803485, @Aklapper wrote:

@Guycn2: Can you please clarify?

Thanks for fixing it

@Liuxinyu970226, the word "you" always stays the same in Hebrew, regardless of the reader's gender.

In T145562#2636473, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:

There was T31170, however, this seems unlikely to be happen before 2017 because of T24769. Suggest to mark as "stalled" (and wish this to be resolved in 2017)?

@IKhitron, I'm afraid I don't understand the meaning of your proposal. Could you please create a screenshot and add annotations/captions on it with explanation of what part of the slider you propose to change?

Thank you for fixing it

@Florian , thank you for the patch

@Florian, "Your connected Google accounts has been changed".

In T138715#2612179, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

Users shouldn't get here unless they're URL-hacking — MW doesn't provide an edit link to pages which users can't edit. Not sure what the best solution for users who are unfortunate enough to have loaded a link to a page that got protected/etc. whilst they were loading it.

In T142316#2603606, @TTO wrote:

In T142316#2603440, @Nemo_bis wrote:

That's the bug actually, message reuse. Probably the message needs to be split,

That's what my patch does. Unfortunately, it hasn't received much attention.

In T144262#2594063, @IKhitron wrote:

Come on, @Guycn2.

1. I don't sure anyone except you saw this at all.
2. And even if he did, I'm sure it's not disturb to anyone.
3. You were asked about this in T141167, and you said it's "the most acceptable format".

In T142262#2593670, @WMDE-leszek wrote:

As full Hebrew month names are being used now this problem should be gone, right?
@Guycn2 @IKhitron could you please verify this and tell us if this is resolved?

In T143151#2560519, @Jakob_WMDE wrote:

@Guycn2 thank you for noticing the bug and for the good report! :)

@Jakob_WMDE, Thank you for the patch!

Thanks for the patch

@Florian, thank you for the patch!

In T142599#2543265, @Nemo_bis wrote:

It's annoying that now the names of the wikis have to be configured in so many places. :( What is the authoritative source for the English name of a Wikimedia wiki?

MediaWiki:Thanks-confirmation-special should support wiki syntax as well.

But a lot of languages use different forms for "user" according to the gender. The lack of {{GENDER}} support in this message causes inconvenience.

@WMDE-leszek, thank you for the detailed explanation. In Hebrew, the most acceptable format is LLL, which is option B on the table.

Thanks for approving it!

In T87856#2531262, @matej_suchanek wrote:

In T87856#2531260, @Guycn2 wrote:

In T87856#2531222, @matej_suchanek wrote:

In T87856#2531213, @Guycn2 wrote:

@Glaisher, when will the patch affect Wikimedia projects?

It hasn't been approved yet. It should be on the first Wednesday or Thursday after that happens.

OK. Well then, who can approve it?

Experienced, privileged users. Just be patient, it shouldn't take long time.

In T87856#2531222, @matej_suchanek wrote:

In T87856#2531213, @Guycn2 wrote:

@Glaisher, when will the patch affect Wikimedia projects?

It hasn't been approved yet. It should be on the first Wednesday or Thursday after that happens.

I strongly recommend to decrease the Echo icons. They're way too big in my opinion. Some users from hewiki also complained about their size.

@Glaisher, when will the patch affect Wikimedia projects?

@TTO, thank you! :)

In T142316#2531010, @TTO wrote:

emailuser is the generic message used in lists of special pages, etc., so there is no point adding GENDER there. On the actual special page, the title of the page is set to one of the following messages, according to whether there is a target or not:

	"emailuser-title-target": "Email this {{GENDER:$1|user}}",
	"emailuser-title-notarget": "Email user",

As for userrights, the term "user" is used in the context of the noun phrase "user rights management", where it refers to the abstract concept of a user, rather than any individual user, so I don't think the use of GENDER is appropriate here.

In T141071#2526038, @WMDE-leszek wrote:

Yes, this has changed indeed. This is intentional. Showing popups above bars turned out to be problematic. For instance it has been reported in T141093 that when there is no main section header of the diff page (which happens on some wikis for main page diff, for instance) the popup does not entirely fits the screen. Also (maybe even worse problem) when appearing above the bars popups could cover patrolling buttons which makes might be slightly annoying to people patrolling revisions. And generally there is not that much space above the bars so there is only limited amount of space to squeeze the popup in there.

To avoid such problems we decided to move popups below the bars. Placed over there popups still do "hide" some contents of the diff page but we think that possible "hidden" parts (diff column headers) not being entirely visible when popup is up is still acceptable.

In T141071#2525926, @WMDE-leszek wrote:

The change has been deployed and the issue should be now solved.
Please report if there are still happened to be some problems or bugs in this regard. And thank you @Guycn2 for reporting this!

@WMDE-leszek, thank you very much, edit summaries are now properly displayed!

In addition, it doesn't only LOOK bad. It prevents users from clicking links that are hidden by these large icons (such as tabs on the top).

In T141254#2519249, @Lea_WMDE wrote:

Hi @Guycn2, I guess this issue comes down to finding out if people who put both pointers on the same revision know what that means or not. If they know, we would not have to help them out of the situation. If they get scared of an empty diff, we should think of something. Did you yourself get confused when you saw an empty diff? If yes, how did you end up there? Did you accidentally move both pointers to the same revision or did you test for that situation?

@Lea_WMDE, It did not happen to me, but a user from hewiki complained about it.

@Lea_WMDE, it can be closed, there are no longer gender issues. (I hope I closed it well...)

Thanks for the patch

The icons look fine on Vector (although I would decrease them a little bit).

Thank you so much for the patch!

OK, thank you!