As an addition, I see I can mark the first page here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amargosawoestijn&oldid=44538491&diff=prev ("[Als gecontroleerd markeren]" is mentioned next to "Nieuwere bewerking" and below), but I don't see such a link here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amargosawoestijn&redirect=no (see printscreens)

More examples:

• https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amargosawoestijn&redirect=no (originally named "Amargosa Desert")
• https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lijst_van_voetbalinterlands_Filipijnen_-_Pakistan&redirect=no

In T62373#1455021, @Krenair wrote:

@Trijnstel, the script has been run on slwiktionary. Please check for logs on https://sl.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:RevisionDelete?type=revision&ids=89131
If that works we can run it on nlwiki to check the given example, and if that's fine as well then I'll run it on all wikis other than enwiki (since the main migration script hasn't been run there yet, it'll get done at the same time).

In T98625#1317336, @Glaisher wrote:

In T98625#1272873, @MarcoAurelio wrote:

By the way, it'd be good if it could only be used by registered users [...]

Special:Email is better in that case? ContactPage allows both registered and unregistered users to use it and doesn't have an option for specifically disallowing unregistered users.

In T98625#1274877, @Glaisher wrote:

Would a simple form similar to Special:EmailUser be fine?

In T65927#1215286, @Aklapper wrote:

The BounceHandler extension is now deployed to all Wikimedia wikis, so is this fixed now?

In T95408#1189527, @Legoktm wrote:

I suppose we need a javascript confirm button on the rename queue like Special:GlobalRenameUser has?

In T387#1180482, @Billinghurst wrote:

• What problem are we solving?

Totally agree; though perhaps a different note section should be added which the requester won't be able to see?

John Lewis added - he might answer your questions. @Teles: you don't have the admin password anymore?

In T89205#1034092, @Krenair wrote:

Rights, that's what we thought. Please read T89205#1029906

AFAIK only one: namely the removal of CU rights from Bencmq@zhwiki. He had them since March 2013 and now he doesn't have them anymore though it isn't logged. When will this be fixed? (and maybe for more rights removals, or were the others already done?)

What if this task is being done and accounts need to be unblocked? Will the email then automatically be confirmed again? (ie. think about returning OTRS agents, CheckUsers and/or stewards)

+1! Yes, please, I also wondered about this.

And now the error...

In T65927#709675, @Aklapper wrote:

Sven: Is this still a problem nowadays?

I don't have experience with some functions since they were already down when I became a CU, maybe others can tell whether they are useful. I know of other CUs who used the traceroute tools etc, but as I said, I can't tell anything about it. Anyhow:

In T85703#952707, @Aklapper wrote:

@Bennylin: Which other "small wikis" are you aware of that are affected?

@Krenair I checked it again and it's kinda weird.... I searched in the suppression log on nlwiki and actually, there *is* an entry in the log (look for the date "19 dec 2010 15:04"), BUT... the log entry isn't mentioned on the suppression log of the suppressed edit as can be seen here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciaal:VersieVerwijderen&type=revision&target=Ad_van_den_Berg_%28activist%29&ids=23646821 (if you know what I mean) And that should be fixed ofc.

In T43473#936648, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

In T43473#936646, @Trijnstel wrote:

In T43473#825038, @Aklapper wrote:

Mail has been more than once to users, asking them to create an account in Phabricator.
If users don't check their mail than there's not much sense in sending them more mail. I personally won't stop you from doing so though.

I might be wrong, but I don't remember an email asking me to create an account... (I was alerted to this by Romaine.)

I got P174 on 24 October 2014 to each of the e-mail addresses I had in Bugzilla. Maybe it went to your spam? There were also a series of e-mails to wikitech-l and (I think?) wikitech-ambassadors.

In T40195#833723, @MarcoAurelio wrote:

This should be easy to fix IMHO, but I think CUs should discuss which links would like to replace the outdated ones and other improvements, such as new links. Perhaps somebody with access could raise this issue on the mailing list to get this rolling? Best regards.

In T43473#825038, @Aklapper wrote:

In T43473#823769, @Nemo_bis wrote:

James, please manually notify Platonides of your priority change (as he's not in phabricator yet).

That doesn't make sense. Mail has been more than once to users, asking them to create an account in Phabricator.
If users don't check their mail than there's not much sense in sending them more mail. I personally won't stop you from doing so though.

Hello? Any update on this? @Reedy? The log actions are still not added...

@Reedy - you might have converted the oversighted edits to suppression (thanks for that), but you didn't convert/import the log actions. Which means we now have fully suppressed edits without any reasoning about why something was removed. See for example: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciaal:VersieVerwijderen&type=revision&target=Ad_van_den_Berg_%28activist%29&ids=23646821 (I remembered this one as it was the last oversighted edit on nlwiki). I assumed the log entries would be converted/imported too, but apparently not... (even a short note like "this edit was suppressed by xxx on xxx because of xxx via the now obsolete oversight extension" or something along those lines)