Just to note that we are currently using Module:Disambiguation to detect dab pages, but it is extremely hacky and not guaranteed to work in all cases

Thanks for quick response. It is indeed fixed now.

In T278962#7548616, @LucasWerkmeister wrote:

Please quit ping-spamming.

An update on this important and long-standing issue would be much appreciated.

@AnkitaxPriya what are you looking for in the article? It is a template parameter, an identifier on an external link, a category or something in the text itself? If you can be more specific about what you're trying to do then I will try and help.

For those working on this task, there is a useful tutorial here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Pywikibot_-_Python_3_Tutorial

Your page is User:Pushpanjali kumari/Outreachy 1

Add the first one (with qualifier) then press "Add value" to add another

@Pushp24 you are right that P2555 (fee) can be used for this, but the value of that property should be the fee itself (not Bihar Museum) along with a unit (e.g. Indian rupee).

In T278860#6967778, @AnkitaxPriya wrote:

I'm trying to 'Add statements' in Wikidata but unable to. Please guide @Mike_Peel

Great work everyone. If anyone is waiting for feedback on this task, just let me know.

Seems to be a duplicate of T222274.

Is this related or duplicate of T246746?

There are many wikidata edits which are higher up on my list of things I do not wish to see on my enwiki watchlist (e.g. removal of a label in Swahili). I do agree with Mike, but it seems less urgent than these other edits.

That looks like a useful template, thanks @Bovlb. I still think the best solution would be to change the software so that:

• Draft articles can continue to be linked to Wikidata items
• These drafts do not appear as interwiki links on other sister projects
• Interwiki links do appear on the draft article.

This doesn't seem to be an issue now. Must have been resolved.

On the other hand it would be useful to have interwiki links FROM draft articles, as this would help people translating, etc.

Just reported the same issue at en:Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback and was directed here. Any progress with this yet?

I have also been unable to follow the instructions to get a citation out of the ref tags. I see the same windows as Sunpriat.

If this behaviour is intentional, then I wonder what was the rationale for the current implementation?

Merged ... think I did that correctly.