Hi, @Aklapper I have updated the page with link to my list of contributions on Gerrit. You may find all code and patches I submitted. Does it better now? ;-)

Hi all, the final evaluation report wiki page is available now. Please check it out😄

@Aklapper Oh that's good. I will create the page soon

That's a good idea. Where should I put the wiki page? Or just create a new one ;-)

Wiki page is a great idea. But Google says once I submit the link cannot be changed... What should I do now?

The link is attached now. Please check it out ;-)

@01tonythomas Apologize for some lateness in submitting the weekly report! I will start updating the weekly report daily from now on.

see https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/291489/

@01tonythomas hi, as you mentioned, I think workboard is better if I can create new column, I'm confused whether can I create one?

@Danny_B thanks and is it ok now?

@Aklapper Thanks for your reminder:D

In T133647#2255857, @01tonythomas wrote:

In T133647#2255827, @Lethexie wrote:

@AbdealiJK Thank you , And how about the second Phabricator project created? Should I create new task in Phabricator for the GSoC project?

We recommend projects go into separate phab projects, but this one is a special case :D (kinda fitting in the parent task) . Please start a Conpherence with your mentors asking whether your task can be merged with MediaWiki-Codesniffer , or should go as a separate one. You can ask that in a phabricator task too, adding your mentors as subscribers.

@AbdealiJK Thank you , And how about the second Phabricator project created? Should I create new task in Phabricator for the GSoC project?

@EBernhardson About the detailed plan mentioned in T133647 ,I want to ask you for feedback on the plan mentioned in my proposal. Is it a viable scheme or anything need to improve?

@Sumit Hi, I have some doubts on the bonding process:

@Legoktm @Addshore @EBernhardson Hi, could you give me your opinions about the detailed plan of GSoC. Also, please tell me how to contact with you during the next 3 months :D

@Sumit Thanks, excited to have this chance :)

@Addshore , @EBernhardson , @Legoktm Could you give me some feedback?

@Aklapper I hava changed the summary of this task (T_T)

@Aklapper Should it be closed as RESOLVED util a patch is merged ? I thought mistakenly that it can be changed to RESOLVED once a patch had been submitted.

@Aklapper : Thanks :)

@Aklapper Sorry,I input two space acturally. I don't know the reason why it just display single space :P
Oh,thanks for you reminder of Gerrit ,I will follow it :)

Hi, actually I meet this situation also so that I have submitted my changes about it just now.

Hi there,I have submitted my changes to Gerrit about this, I hope it may useful :)

@Aklapper : Thank you, I have submitted my changes to Gerrit.

I has completed the code of this sniff, and what should I do to push request?

Hello,
In the past few days, I add some features about the MediaWiki CodeSniffer, it's useful? @EBernhardson @Addshore @Legoktm

I noticed that the procedure for checking dirname() is crowded with too many if statements. Perhaps we can refactor it into a loop? and it seems a little confused , especially new features need. refactor the struct of CodeSniffer is helpful?

I'm a student who are willing to take part in GSoC 2016. I have read the current CodeSniffer code, and I'm interested in the CI ,I hope I can do something for it.