I'm from Milano but I switched to Sicilian since that's awesome. Thanks Pppery, Brennen, and all!
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Today
Thanks @CCiufo-WMF - I subscribed to the mentioned tasks
Yesterday
I'm particularly OK with these:
Announced in Tech Boost bulletin.
As usual, sury.org is our friend.
Can you please explain this further?
Tue, Apr 23
Sun, Apr 21
This solution is interesting. Even if it probably will never work without JavaScript.
Thanks for this survey about Codex. Can I propose the adoption of Wikimedia LimeSurvey to deliver it? (Sorry if you already had the idea to do so - and thanks again in this case)
Sat, Apr 20
(We are triaging this idea with the dear @Daimona )
Boz, mi chiudi il task?
Thanks valcio \o/
Fri, Apr 12
In T107254#9710628, @Krinkle wrote:@valerio.bozzolan The SQL statements and comments appear in contradiction. For every comment that says "Skipped bug X - state was REOPENED" there is in fact a real update statement that does exactly what the comment says it doesn't. Is this intentional?
Here our generated SQL patch candidate ready for review:
Thu, Apr 11
Thanks 🎄 Imported here in CSV:
In T107254#9706654, @Aklapper wrote:And if it would work on a static HTML dump like ours, instead of a real BZ instance.
Anyway a required step is to take P49618 and make a nice phabricator.csv.
Have anybody already checked the file mentioned in the description, that is, maybe an useful starting point?
Small note
Tue, Apr 9
Mon, Apr 8
In T356384#9696453, @TheresNoTime wrote:okay you've stumped me and a couple of other folx — how did you set that cover image on this task?? :D
Fri, Apr 5
Just to clarify, here the proposal is to close this kind of repositories (?)
Tue, Apr 2
I sincerely do not remember what I was doing here :D will retry to do something during the next WMHack. I will continue from this point:
Thu, Mar 28
Yes! I don't want to steal credit from you :D
Mar 22 2024
Sorry my friend but I never understood how to use Gerrit D:
Mar 21 2024
Maybe related?
Uh! Nice homepage! This means the patch is online and worked \o/ https://we.phorge.it/D25447
Mar 17 2024
Mar 14 2024
Partially related,
Mar 12 2024
Ouch. The example diff was deleted :(
Good luck :)
Mar 11 2024
Maybe time for T338349: Setup a Zabbix Server on a new "monitoring" server :D
Also I don't know the difference between cache and _cache under wp-content 🤔
(I see that you are removing stuff. Nice. Thanks)
If possible let's disable "Object Cache" in W3C
We are not alone with W3 Total Cache
Uhm
Probably the sockets file must be different 🤔 I will try today in late night.
Not needed anymore?
Mar 10 2024
By the way, I do not quite understand why, even if the repository is owned by root, this error is raised. It has no sense to do not trust stuff owned by the root user, in my modest opinion.
Mar 8 2024
Mar 4 2024
Thanks @sbassett - I think the Status of this Task can follow the related security guidelines. I mean, feel free to open if you suggest so, also to attract more eyeballs. Wikimedia Italy adopted a different solution that does not involve any secret and does not involve Lockdown. If anybody else out of there is affected, in any case it may never resolve without opening this. Thanks.
Mar 3 2024
Feel free to close this as declined, since at least my known stakeholders migrated away from Lockdown and completely changed their workflows to do not involve any secret in the wiki. There are private pages only for members, but just for commodity reasons. No secret is stored. So their workflows cannot involve security issues anymore.
Feb 29 2024
Can we keep this opened but stalled? Otherwise I forget to follow this correct procedure to unlock Community-consensus-needed:
Feb 28 2024
This is probably the very first version requiring the usual database upgrade script, since it improves search engine for repository names.
I can confirm that MediaWiki already supports this kind of personalization. If you are lazy, just using CSS may be fine from MediaWiki:Common.css. Look at the <body> for interesting CSS page-specific selectors.
Feb 27 2024
I'm somehow confused since I thought that Phabricator was a "touch point" of the "technical decision making" process
In T309328#9062315, @taavi wrote:Please take this discussion to a more appropriate/on-wiki venue.
Feb 25 2024
APT was broken
Note that at the time of writing the documentation says