Since some sessions are much longer than others (and afternoon sessions are more likely to get impinged upon), we should try to match longer topics to longer sessions.

Thanks. I'll try watching and see how it works. I think 1) I didn't understand about watching, and 2), I'm concerned about spam from watching the whole project as opposed to having some default subscribers that can be edited.

1. figure out what time is supposedly reserved for departments. The current published draft (https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/All_Hands/2018/Schedule) is fully booked; which 3 hours did the C-team have in mind to hand back to Departments? Friday afternoon?
2. contact All-hands organizers (Lauren, Danny, Moriel, according to https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/All_Hands/2018) and see if Victoria + Toby is enough clout to get reserved rooms
3. if not, look for other space nearby in the Presidio.

first draft done; followup work will be tracked elsewhere.

Mostly done/partly obsolete given changes in Annual Plan planning.

obsolete given changes in Annual Plan planning.

completed first draft last month

Looks like about 10 projects or tasks accumulated in the "Projects to Create" column. Is this something that gets tackled once a week or something, or is there any sense of ETA?

@JAufrecht to follow up with teams on date conflicts. @srodlund to check with @DarTar about Wikicite conflicts. (May 21, 2018).

I think this is done as per Victoria's email.

Resolving as per Kevin's note.

Resolving as per Kevin's note.

Currently uses datetimestamp with time data discarded, such as 20170501 0:00:00 UT. but all calculations treat this as a date, so there is a lot of conversion code, which may be inconsistent, and there are lots of opportunities for fencepost errors, such as where midnight is counted. There are also a few "day + 1" hacks in the code. All of this should be eliminated in favor of treating all timestamps from Phabricator as dates only. This will change a core database table column and be a big refactor.