@Ladsgroup: Thank you so much!

That's fine and no problem at all from our side, @Ladsgroup! That would help us a lot actually. Thank you so much!

Hi @Ladsgroup. I'm sorry for reopening the ticket again but someone just flagged to me that "EU" can be problematic because it could mean only countries within the European Union, which would not consider the UK, Ukraine, Norway, Switzerland, Macedonia, etc. Would it still be possible to change it to the address glam-europe@wikimedia.org?

Thank you so much, @Ladsgroup! We really appreciate this and have started to share it with folks already. 🙌

@Ladsgroup: I completely agree! Thank you for letting us know about the standardization and it makes total sense to be similar to the glam-us one. I already talked to the rest of the group and we agreed on "glam-eu" instead. Thanks again!

Hi @CBogen and @matthiasmullie! Just to let you know the list of users names for the event can be found on this Outreach Dashboard page. We expect that closer to the event's date (and even at the exact time of the event) the participants list will increase.

Thank you, @herron and @Aklapper!

Hi everyone! Apologies for the lack of answers. I was out on Friday, Monday, and Tuesday. @Zapipedia-WMF, thank you for providing the link with the style guide and the designs. @FRomeo_WMF, thanks for answering the questions. Perfect answers!

Hi @MMiller_WMF, @kostajh, and @mewoph, just to let you know the Brand Studio approved our request for a logo and they will deliver it on February 28th. We can add it to the page once it's ready.

@MMiller_WMF and @kostajh, a follow-up note: It would be fine, for us, to deal with just one login page. Is that something that works for the Growth team as well? I'm not sure if different pages are necessary, because we would have basically the same text on them. Or are we having different pages because you want to learn the stats from the participants during the different events?

Hey @MMiller_WMF and @kostajh, I've been in contact (and even in a meeting) with the Brand Studio to have a logo/icon for the events, so we could add it to the page and to the posters. However, they haven't agreed to work on this yet. I'm still waiting for an answer. As we don't know whether this is going to happen, I would suggest we go forward without that option for now.

Hey @Spinster! This list is pretty complete already! I compared it to the modeling page on the SDC portal and the modeling page with suggestions by @Dominicbm as part of the DPLA project, and it seems great. Maybe a suggestion would be to add title (P1476) or even, if it’s a GLAM initiative, Commons media contributed by (P9126).

@Spinster, I asked around the Structured Data team and their suggestion was to use Beta, as it is also the one they use. As long as you're only uploading files and not changing any code, it should be fine.

Thank you, @matthiasmullie! This looks so much better and it's more understandable.

@matthiasmullie thank you for recording this video! However, I was wondering if you could record another one using actual references. We were showing this to some GLAM partners, as @Dominicbm, and we were a bit confused about how it actually works, how it would look once ready. Thank you!

Hi, everyone! Yes, this activity is not on the SD team roadmap for now, but after we talked to them about it and the importance this could have on GLAM-Wiki activities, they want to understand the Commons community's interest in it as well. I added a section about it on the Structured Data on Commons talk page. Please, share your thoughts there too -- and we might see this happening! Thanks!