What should the conversion factor be? (For dispatch lag, it’s 60 – five seconds of replication lag are equivalent to five minutes of dispatch lag.)
Based on the last three months, 5 minutes seems fine but we could go for 10 if needed.
What should the conversion factor be? (For dispatch lag, it’s 60 – five seconds of replication lag are equivalent to five minutes of dispatch lag.)
Based on the last three months, 5 minutes seems fine but we could go for 10 if needed.
We could write some template that shows up on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Talkpageheader, with respecting the namespace.
Looks good to me, "box-sizing:border-box;" might be needed in the CSS to keep the padding the same.
This also affects the administrators noticeboard now due to it being mentioned there, makes it harder to interact instantly via IRC.
I’m not following wrong merges a lot nowadays, but thos sounds like a logical restriction to me (aka following MediaWiki-behaviour).
Might be related to T182983.
Special:Nuke doesn't load for me either.
How will the user be informed that descriptions should not generally start with a capital letter in most languages?
Haven't encountered this so far using the same configuration as Magnus. Maybe lists of enabled gadgets would be nice to have? Already checked common.js/global.js files of the listed users.
I've hidden the "Download as PDF" option last year as it also doesn't work for regular items, but it seems the CSS has changed.
In T144765#4601618, @Addshore wrote:
Reminds me of the discussion we had about this at WikiCite last year. The MoSCoW method was mentioned as well: must have is the current mandatory mode, should have is what we're discussing here and could have is the default mode.
In T199274#4551253, @Krinkle wrote:In T199274#4550908, @Sjoerddebruin wrote:Users on nlwiki are complaining they can't hide the sitenotice: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Suriname_en_de_Caraïben
I don't see dismissSiteNotice appearing in my local storage after dismissing the sitenotice.
Look in sessionStorage instead. It works for me?
- View https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kroeg, click "Sluiten"
- Reload the page. Banner does not appear.
In the consolesessionStorage // shows: Storage {dismissSiteNotice: "2.68", ... }
Users on nlwiki are complaining they can't hide the sitenotice: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Suriname_en_de_Caraïben
Can confirm that this is fixed, thank you very much!
Well, I do would love some option to say that references to Wikipedia aren't enough.
It would indeed be better than adding something to just a single item!
So I've just discovered that this is a leftover from our special pages before the ooui conversion. A part was removed in T159702, but it seems like we don't need these CSS styles (from 2012!) at all anymore. I've updated the patch to remove the CSS file and the usage in the tests. Also Special:SetSiteLink was still using these styles, after this change has been merged the margin under the checkboxes will be okay again.
Common pattern in the last few days is people also saying that they didn't receive some confirmation e-mail while receiving one in the years before.
Thank you for checking. Most people don't seem to be able to find the close button of the banner, and I agree that it's quite hidden.
Daily complaints are coming in with people seeing the banner again after donating (probably with IDEAL).
Seems like this is affecting the MassMessage extension: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/massmessage&offset=&limit=250&type=massmessage&user=
Seems like the span that tries to clear the image floating isn't included in the processed code...
Can reproduce it in Firefox 60.0.b6 on macOS. Seems like something with word breaking, turning "word-break: break-all;" off renders the box correctly.
Dutch community also received a report about the sandbox situation. Maybe the SandboxLink extension can be adjusted for that, as it has "sandboxlink-subpage-name".
In T186950#3960661, @Legoktm wrote:Patch is deployed, could someone please confirm that this is fixed?
Can confirm, see the recently attached accounts on my account: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=Sjoerddebruin
This seems to be T102324. It used to show the same suggestions as for new statements, btw.
In T141845#3933604, @Superchilum wrote:In T141845#3933603, @Sjoerddebruin wrote:This is creating constraint violations day in, day out.
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Does that mean you don't agree with this request?