In T230382#8605191, @BCornwall wrote:

Hi, @Sotiale, does @Ladsgroup's answer answer your question? Any progress on the discussion?

Hi. Langcom is discussing this and is wondering how we can respond to the existing interwiki content([[minnan:Foo]], [[w:minnan:Foo]], [[:minnan:w:Foo]], and [[wikt:minnan:Foo]], etc.. various forms including zh-cfr) regarding its removal. How can you figure out where it is and how can you fix it? Thanks.

I'll do scrutineering with VPN if needed (I've been advised to detour to Europe), but hopefully this issue gets resolved before then ;)

Hi. This is not the wiki normally handled by langcom. Its closure may be done with the consent of AffCom, and will not be handled in the usual manner determined by langcom through community procedures.

Hi. I haven't been asked to use this feature recently. Few people probably know about this feature. If onwiki javascript can cover this, and if it's nothing else to concern about on the server side, then removing this feature is unlikely to have a negative impact.

Hi. I received an inquiry from incubatorwiki that an error appears when setting preference.

It's very good that I can't work because of this, but if this delays someone's requests, people who are angry with it will complain to someone. Please, solve this problem quickly.

In T266523#6607951, @Huji wrote:

@Urbanecm please strike the vote by پخش مطلب because they voted while being blocked on fawiki, which is against our election policy.

In T262689#6558699, @Huji wrote:

After that, we won't bother you until Nov 6 which is the start of the tally period. I will make sure the local community expresses any and all concerns about sock voters before then. I and the other fawiki CUs will conduct checks locally, based on that information or based on requests form you/@Sotiale and I will also provide you with a python script that will help with identify votes submitted through a proxy.

The period of Nov 6 to Nov 10 will be really busy; I ask you and @Sotiale to set aside time accordingly. Thanks again for your contributions!

I prepared to make enough time according to the schedule. Thank you for letting me know kindly.

In T255569#6230950, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@Sotiale: Most wikis seem to have the right as 'rollbacker', I assume that's you want not 'rollbackers'

In T255031#6211632, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@Sotiale: Which one then?

• All ko wikis

OR

• Just kowikiqoute

In T255031#6211483, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@Sotiale: Is this a more general alias that can be done for all ko wikis like an alt spelling or wiki-specfic like U/UT?

(Rename task) I've tried both large and small cases with accounts to move. It works very well and it's being processed quickly.
Can we now handle the delayed rename request? It's estimated to be around 100+.

In T240518#5743510, @jcrespo wrote:

@DutchTina @1997kB @MarcoAurelio Could you notify to the Global Renamers list of the issue, so they are aware of this situation?

In T240438#5732087, @Bugreporter wrote:

(In each language version of Wikiversity, the administrators are called 'custodians'.)

The internal name is still sysop. The displayed name may be changed via https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Group-sysop.

The internal name of new user group should be test-sysop, consistent with Incubator. See T139246

I was so surprised that it was taken care of so quickly. Thank you very much for your attention!!

In T238512#5675217, @Marostegui wrote:

Thanks for the heads up.

The main account went well. (looks fine) I will handle bot account at 14:20 by UTC.

Yes, I also remember that this is the first time such a big rename has happened.

In T238512#5670164, @Marostegui wrote:

Thanks for the heads up
Could you post the UTC time as well?

Thanks!