In T178297#6539198, @Yaron_Koren wrote:

I am still the maintainer of Semantic Drilldown, although I really shouldn't be any more. I've been meaning to pass it off for a long time now.

In T178297#6536726, @Krabina wrote:

Why would you think that? I agree that it is not very likely, but if you have a lot of data (imagine a company database, e. g.), you might want to filter for all entries with the same URL or e-mail.

In T178297#6537609, @Yaron_Koren wrote:

I agree that Quantity and Temperature would be great to be able to filter on. This requires a lot of unit handling, and I hope someone can implement these.

I had no idea that there was a "Keyword" datatype. It looks like it was added about two years ago. Kind of strange, but it would be great to able to filter on this as well.

This issue is solved by the patch I commited, however it would be interesting what should be do with the another datatypes. Should it be supported by Semantic Drilldown?

At least in my possible use cases and the ones I am interested, I think it is very useful to allow filter by:

In T178297#6535634, @Krabina wrote:

(Before that the filter worked, but the error message was displayed).

I will take a look, @Krabina!

In T252788#6296674, @MarcoFalda wrote:

This is a tentative patch for version 2.0.2 that adds a parameter "group" to the filters in order to allow for collecting filters and also an "Export" link that fills a semantic search form (Special :Ask).
I hope that it will be useful and it will be integrated in SD.

groups-and-export-patch.diff15 KBDownload

@Kghbln, I think this issue should be marked as resolved due T265059#6533166. The patch provides backward compatibility with SMW < 3.2, so I think it isn't necessary to remove the reference from .phpcs.xml.

With your permission, @Yaron_Koren, I mark this bug as resolved. If it needs something more, just tell me. Thank you for your reviews in the patch!

This one is my first contribution to MediaWiki and Semantic Drilldown, so I hope it accomplish with all the requirements. There is another reference to $smwgContLang in .phpcs.xml but I prefer to not remove it in this patch. I think it is better to have this one merged, and then remove the another reference, linking the patch to T246581.

But to enable these rules is necessary to know which options you want, check htmllint options. tag-close is the only which works when I set to true.

@Urbanecm, this is my first contribution to Gerrit, so I hope I have done everything correctly.

In T178745#4941639, @abian wrote:

An option similar to the one @Ivanhercaz suggests would be choosing the accent color #eaf3ff instead of the base color #eaecf0 for the background; this color is documented on M101.

@Urbanecm, what about a message like this one:

You're welcome @Urbanecm!

Hi @Urbanecm. I have doubts about this task and T213173. I searched the socialauth package and I only find its documentation page and all its related stuff (PyPI, GitHub, etcetera). It isn't seem to be related or developed for Wikimedia projects, nor nothing tracked here. And the most strange is that I don't understand where is the MediaWiki method you are using, because it isn't in [authentication.py](https://github.com/emilyhorsman/socialauth/blob/master/socialauth/authentication.py) neither in other files.

That's a nice idea and easy to implement. I would do it, but as @thiemowmde and @Jan_Dittrich note, it is necessary to have a concern about it. Could we agree a basic style and then request comments about it?

If I am not wrong, the easier way to add a link to the JSON, RDF and Turtle is to modify [Mediawiki:Pageinfo-footer](https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Pageinfo-footer&action=edit). I wanted to do it, but I think this has some issues to keep in mind:

@Chicocvenancio, what's necessary to fix this task? I understand the main issue is to make easier to know that Pywikibot is available in PAWS, no?

Ha! Didn't remember I made that.

In T120629#4923360, @Chicocvenancio wrote:

@Ivanhercaz The live code for PAWS is in https://github.com/yuvipanda/paws PAWS-beta lives in https://github.com/chicocvenancio/paws/tree/dev PRs against either are very welcome.

Thank you for the information @Dalba! If I find time to check this task, I will claim it.

This is an easy task because can hide it as Framawiki suggested. But I would like to know how we can contribute to this kind of tasks. Is it explained in some page in Mediawiki or Wikitech? If someone explain me that, as you @Chicocvenancio, I could claim this task.

I would like to help with this task, that doesn't seem very hard to apply, but I have an important doubt with the source code of this script. In the line 188 there is a call to the method run() from the class MispellingRobot but, where is that method? I don't see it in the source code. I understand everything except that. Could anyone clarify me this?

I will check it tomorrow to know if my knowledge I am able to do this or if I can learn to do it. For the moment, I am going to claim this task.

In T193933#4184505, @Psychoslave wrote:

Until we have a wll at wikimedia dot org or something like that, @Wikilover90 created wikiloveslove at gmail dot com

All right @Romaine, excuse me because I was confused after the conversation. I think that @Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga won't have any problem to let you claim this task. He also claimed T193939. There is work and tasks for everyone!

Okay, I have read now T193952. Tomorrow I will check it fine.

In T193796#4184480, @Psychoslave wrote:

I started something on the second point, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Love/Appreciation

In T193796#4184485, @Psychoslave wrote:

I think that before we launch that, it would be better to have a simple "support" blue button, that directly edit the page, without requiring to type any wikitext.

by removing them from Wikidata, or by some other solution yet to identify.

In T193796#4181241, @Psychoslave wrote:

The second point is purely about writing some promotional, isn't it?

In T193796#4181237, @Psychoslave wrote:

Ok. So far I thanked people who signed the support section on Meta through the Mediawiki "thank" feature.

For the first point, I would have spontaneously thought more of something like a bot, but since you talked about template, I guess that it's not what you had in mind. So it might involve something like a javascript modifying several page at the same time. I didn't made such a thing so far on Mediawiki. I plan to learn that in the coming time, especially OOUI, but if anyone is already skilled on this tools, please go on, just let me know if you need review. :)

@Psychoslave, not exactly. The final goal is: