Hey @Samwalton9-WMF, Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time to review the Adiutor extension and for providing such detailed and constructive feedback. I deeply appreciate your insights, After these reviews, I will release another update for Adiutor and do my best to fix the issues you mentioned.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Tue, Apr 9
Feb 24 2024
Feb 23 2024
Feb 11 2024
Hello @Lofhi, thanks for the feedback, I've updated Adiutor gadget's css file and requested necessary changes from your wiki.
Feb 10 2024
Feb 9 2024
Feb 7 2024
Feb 6 2024
Feb 5 2024
Feb 4 2024
Feb 3 2024
When I've updated Vector skin with master branch it fixed, bu now I'm getting following backtraces:
Feb 2 2024
@AnneT I'm glad to have heard this, thank you for taking the time and showing interest.
Feb 1 2024
Hello @AnneT, first of all, thank you very much for your valuable comments and insights. I really appreciate your acknowledgment of my efforts. Based on your feedbacks, I have prepared a patch that I will push to Gerrit, and I'll add you as a reviewer. I just wanted to ask if there are any obstacles to the deployment of the extension by WMF at the moment. Can I address other minor things in subsequent updates?
In T349598#9505899, @Samwalton9-WMF wrote:In T349598#9491943, @Dogu wrote:Here, you can see the beta:
https://adiutor.wmcloud.org/wiki/Special:AutoModeratorConfiguration
You can get the config values with mw.config.get("wgAutoModeratorConfiguration")
The labels and the other things can be done with a patch, this is just a beta to show how it works.
Thanks for your interest in Automoderator! As we discussed elsewhere this ticket is an Epic and the current work on setting up Automoderator is only happening internally to the Wikimedia Foundation right now - we're not set up to receive volunteer contributions right now, while we work on the fundamental technology and architecture for this project. We'll make it clearer when we'll be better positioned for volunteer contributions :)
Jan 31 2024
Jan 28 2024
Jan 27 2024
Here, you can see the beta:
Jan 26 2024
Jan 25 2024
It seems that WebRequest::getRequestId() has been deprecated in the latest version of the MediaWiki core repository, based on what I observed in the code.
Jan 24 2024
Jan 23 2024
Jan 21 2024
Jan 19 2024
Jan 18 2024
Hi @CCiufo-WMF, thank you for your prompt response! I truly appreciate both design and code reviews. Your feedback and suggestions on how I utilize Codex would be extremely helpful. I am eagerly anticipating your review.
Jan 17 2024
Jan 16 2024
@sbassett - We aim to deploy this extension to Wikimedia production as soon as it is ready. I commit to assume maintenance responsibilities once deployment is complete. I will co-operate with the relevant teams at the Wikimedia Foundation to provide oversight to make sure that maintenance, security, and other issues related to sponsorship and support are managed properly. The Turkish Wikipedia community has requested this deployment, so it will be initiated as soon as the necessary permissions are obtained. It is considered a productivity improvement, and there is no strict deadline for deployment. Its non-deployment does not obstruct anyone from performing their tasks. There is currently no sponsoring team, unless Moderator Tools has the capacity to support it. Gergő Tisza is currently reviewing the code, and I am awaiting the VUE code review.
I've made this changes, but I'm not sure about the result, however this can be done also using logs index anyway, and filterin on client side.
Index: includes/api/ApiQueryLogEvents.php IDEA additional info: Subsystem: com.intellij.openapi.diff.impl.patch.CharsetEP <+>UTF-8 =================================================================== diff --git a/includes/api/ApiQueryLogEvents.php b/includes/api/ApiQueryLogEvents.php --- a/includes/api/ApiQueryLogEvents.php (revision 5dca00526add34d5c566e882e6763baed9d80a38) +++ b/includes/api/ApiQueryLogEvents.php (date 1705362906083) @@ -272,6 +272,15 @@ $this->addOption( 'STRAIGHT_JOIN' ); }
Jan 15 2024
In T355063#9460231, @Dragoniez wrote:@Vikipolimer Thank you, and yes, something like that. If I were an anonymous user and the log #65 had been action-deleted, then the response array in the 2nd example should be empty because the object in it is the only log that matches the current protection settings of the page Hello.
Oh, sorry. I posted the wrong test result; that’s why I deleted it. I’ll post it again as soon as I finish.