Jan 14 2019
Nov 8 2018
Oct 29 2018
Oct 22 2018
Apr 20 2018
A little more detail:
Jan 25 2018
Adding Trey (@TJones) to this task in case any related search work might be useful in ascertaining the cause of the problem or what approaches might help address it.
Jan 17 2018
I've also tried reproducing this error, but I have not been successful with a few different browsers.
Dec 1 2016
The issue of unconfirmed editors not being able to edit their own user page has been resolved via use of a filter with the appropriate exceptions rather than using page protection as an implementation approach.
Nov 21 2016
@Qgil I'm afraid I won't be able to attend the Summit, but I am interested in getting involved here, and am open to making changes to IdeaLab's structure to better accommodate technical proposals. I definitely encourage staff to use IdeaLab generally as a means to pitch ideas or draft proposals for the purpose of gathering community feedback. See this consultation where Community Resources pitched a new set of grant programs as an example, and followed-up with these outcomes based on the community feedback we received on the initial proposal.
Nov 17 2016
Nov 6 2016
The closing admin noted that this aspect was not supported by community consensus, so I think this request can't be fulfilled at this time.
@MusikAnimal Thanks for your work in writing up the filter and testing it out!
Oct 28 2016
Sep 30 2016
Aug 13 2016
Thanks for all this work so far, @Halfak : )
Aug 12 2016
@Halfak - Any idea on when this query might be able to be done? An RfC related to this data is being developed and the proposer is interested in getting this discussion started soon:
Aug 1 2016
Jun 23 2016
May 30 2016
Mar 23 2016
Mar 7 2016
I've received a fatal error when attempting to use Notify Translators just now for this page:
Mar 2 2016
Feb 7 2016
Could we get an update on fixing this problem? Translation is a regular part of my work in terms of preparing consultations that extend to an international audience. After doing some testing myself, putting everything on one line doesn't appear to prevent the edit section links to stop working properly. They either produce errors in the form of "this section doesn't exist," or it attempts to edit another (usually subsequent) section altogether.
Co-op is inactive for the time being.
Co-op is inactive for the time being.
Jan 26 2016
@Aklapper after bypassing my cache, meta.wikimedia.org is still gone.
Agreed, meta.wikimedia.org has been completely replaced with a broken-ish landing page for Wikimedia projects:
Jan 12 2016
Jan 7 2016
@cscott Oh neat! I didn't realize a script like this was hanging around. I'll see if I can wrangle up a few folks tomorrow and Friday to play around with this script.
Dec 15 2015
Oct 28 2015
A great use case for functionality like would be in edit-a-thons, especially ones that are conducted virtually. As an organizer, there are many many times I would like to be able to edit together with someone else, and there are sometimes editors working together. Some edit-a-thons are focused on building one or a small set of articles, in which collaborative editing in real time would be fantastic.
Oct 21 2015
Oct 16 2015
Jul 31 2015
Finally! I've added a general banner to the top of the page pointing people to TWA and Teahouse, and why they may be better alternatives to the Co-op.
May 27 2015
May 21 2015
@Capt_Swing Yeah, I think a browser issue was the case. The two MediaWiki pages have been updated.
I've made the appropriate changes to the .js pages and the Gadgets-definition pages. I also had to restore the "Find a mentor" button to The Co-op front page, as it was commented out ebfore. The gadget is enabled in my preferences.
Apr 30 2015
The specified pages were all moved over today to en.wiki.
Apr 17 2015
OK. @Soni and I went back-and-forth how to organize learners and mentors. Personally, I am OK with either setup in terms of organizing learners and mentors in the space, and I think the category system works just fine. You make a good point about switching as being a matter of changing a few parameters. It would just need to be explained that this would need to be done manually rather than simply hitting the "become a mentor" button.
@Capt_Swing I think that would work very nicely, so let's go for it. Would the list be comprehensive or would it need to be updated in a report-like manner at the Teahouse?
I had said as much in this comment, and I agree that mentors can probably take care of tracking that one their own.
Apr 16 2015
@Capt_Swing - Thanks for the update (and sorry I didn't get back to you yesterday). I think this will be an improvement, but @Soni and I were concerned that many editors who are recently autoconfirmed may have made a bunch of edits all at once and then dropped off. We're also a little concerned that 10 edits is quite small. Having done some evaluation of our mentorships so far, it appears that mentorship seems better suited for editors who are much more invested than this. Many new editors seem to be dropping off right away, even when a mentor contacts them.
Apr 13 2015
@Fhocutt I think we can do without it then, given that it will happen infrequently-- and indeed, out of the 60 or so profiles in the space so far, this is the only case I've seen this double matching happen. I'll inform mentors that will happen rarely, but that whoever gets matched first is the *actual* mentor.
Apr 12 2015
Apr 8 2015
Apr 2 2015
@Halfak Thanks for these more specific suggestions and providing that prior research as a basis for them. I support them. I also agree with @Soni that it would be helpful to know what criteria HostBot is currently using (which, as I recall, are the same as invitees for the Teahouse)
Apr 1 2015
Mar 22 2015
Mar 10 2015
@Soni - Upon some examination, I believe the linking to an editor's userpage is embedded within the Module (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:Co-op_profile), and I'm not sure how to implement this change. @Capt_Swing is better able to handle this, but this functionality is not critical for the space to work in that it saves a click to the editor's talk page.
Mar 5 2015
Mar 2 2015
I've updated the blocking tasks based on what is needed inre: performing deletions to allow Flow to be used on the Co-op.
Mar 1 2015
Addressed with some helpful pointers from @Capt_Swing. : )
@Capt_Swing It might be best to just eliminate this circular frame and make it rectangular; I get the sense that it is causing more trouble than it is worth.
Feb 28 2015
I've gone ahead and made this change. Thanks for the alternate option, Sohail.
@Mattflaschen If topics can actually be deleted individually, that's fine. I can direct admins who are mentors to use this method rather than attempt to delete the entire page, which addresses the issue with T90969.
Feb 27 2015
A solid idea. I'll get to adding this in today. We of course want editors to use the Co-op, but I see no problem with adding in another box that provides some options for TWA and The Teahouse.