Tue, Jan 4
Sat, Jan 1
Mon, Dec 27
Dec 25 2021
I think that there is no apparent opposition from any side (nor much concern), and I don't know whether @jimmyxu and @Wong128hk can scrutinize the outcome without extra help as it is the first time such things are run. So I bet there will mean extra assistance from WMF side for this whole thing.
Dec 10 2021
I am fine for that.
For future elections, we need to wait for the outcome of this election.
Encrypt or not is the same, at least, for the Chinese Wikipedia Community - we just need to know who voted during the election (not how they vote), and possibly a matrix of people voting what after the election. For the sake of safety, the second part can also be mixed where the vote tallies are shown but each vote does not pertain to one person.
Dec 8 2021
Update on the whole thing:
Dec 7 2021
Vote title: 試行安全投票
"jump text": 该投票将在投票專用维基舉行。請點擊下方按鈕跳轉至該專用維基。
"return text": Wikipedia:投票/是否在管理員選舉啟用SecurePoll
"unqualified error": 請注意，此投票僅限擁有延伸確認權限或管理員權限的用戶參與。如果閣下是延伸確認用戶或管理員而出現無法投票的問題，請確保閣下透過中文維基百科中的特定連結進入本頁。如問題持續，請聯繫 email@example.com。
Dec 6 2021
Much thanks for the clarification. I am wondering the same thing as this is the first time doing this type of election thingy, and, as a voter in quite some previous elections that use SecurePoll, that makes me doubt too.
Dec 4 2021
Also, update to question, seems to be minor phrasing.
Dec 3 2021
Due to local settings, it seems that admins are excluded in the group extendconfirmed, so I think we also need to add administrators into the eligible list of voters, or else they will be left out.
Dec 2 2021
Nov 30 2021
Nov 28 2021
Direct quote error. Edited again
Nov 27 2021
List of users who are able to vote will be voters that contain the extendconfirmed right within the Chinese Wikipedia who is not blocked (partial block not counted in this case) nor locked at the start of the election.
Nov 26 2021
Yes, this is the case.
Nov 18 2021
I don't know if that is the case for the Chinese Wikipedia, but the current settings in votewiki may need to boe slightly altered so as to enable votes from the Chinese Mainland Region, where Wikipedia and its sister projects are blocked locally.
Nov 11 2021
@jrbs May I ask if votewiki can be in English while the questions and options to be in Chinese (i.e. no election language change).
Updated the whole election. This one should work?
@JJMC89, the whole thing can be left after the election scrutineering period, but I think other setup processes can be done at the same time.
Updated the link to local discussions. Moved because of the setup of the voting systems.
Updated for two weeks instead of 13 days.
Nov 2 2021
Nov 1 2021
Feb 14 2021
Quick fly-by, but this image corresponds to an internet meme in Hong Kong, though seems unlikely it affects EQSIN servers.
Sep 4 2019
May 29 2019
May 15 2019
From the above consensus, these are the following proposed settings:
May 9 2019
Apr 28 2019
I think range is determined, it is only used at highly vandalized pages, high volume pages, and also FA / GA etc.
Apr 26 2019
Admins should not add or remove extra group per discussion.
Here, I forgot it. lol
Aug 10 2018
Jul 21 2018
@RazeSoldier , should be problem within the Operations tem?
Jul 19 2018
Should be deployment problem?
Jul 16 2018
Removed the project of Chinese-Sites as it seem to affect more than one language version - for the cyrillic users - ja we get the same problem
I just want to ask:
Jul 9 2018
I didn't see the possibility for the interface editors not having the ability to edit userjs.
Though I am skill skeptical of this idea - isn't there other ways to resolve this problem?
Not broken. Thanks for claiming this task @Urbanecm
Jul 7 2018
Jul 6 2018
Jul 5 2018
as a bug reporter and sometimes a person who pushes community consensus to phabricator, I don't see the reason for not giving current users having the interface editor permission or single permission equivalent to obtain the right automatically - that say that interface editor should automatically transit to techadmin, where administrators shouldn't do so.
Jul 2 2018
Throttle it, add new tools, and I think all is set - Do not forget all those attacks. I think it is just the start only.
Jul 1 2018
Just for a note, why not add a button at Phabricator to enable reverting to an earlier state?
Jun 28 2018
Jun 27 2018
Well, consensus showed that we do not want to do so. At the same time, @Urbanecm , I had proposed that but our result is: We should give only the required necessary rights.
Jun 26 2018
Jun 19 2018
Any idea of when it will be deployed? Malaysian editors are urging this now.
Jun 11 2018
@RazeSoldier The fallback language should be : zh-sg over zh-hans and zh-cn
@Liuxinyu970226 Check meta-wiki.
There exists related files
May 24 2018
The content is slightly different in each language variant because of naming methods in different countries. For example, in Hong Kong, we get a set of British names which are not used in other regions, and we would use noteTA to do the conversion.
The main point is about local content: it can now be correctly convert to a more localized version, which is done by noteTA.
I didn't see the difference. The bug is resolved, and most importantly, the localization is already in place but it is just blacklisted.
This does affect the content as we use NoteTA to alter local content, which is the major reason of enabling the variant
They want this as the Malays would want to get their own Chinese Language Variant, which was completely logical. There is community consensus apart from Liuxinyu970226, who opposed it. This could be seen at the discussion page, in which all but him ( @Liuxinyu970226 ) opposed. Thus I would say there is a community consensus for this problem.
May 23 2018
I request a re-evaluation of this task. This task is of high priority at local logic.
May 17 2018
(Just another thing, the Chinese Wikipedia has confirmed to enable the extension once development is finished due to recent changes at local policy)
May 6 2018
Note two more things: zh-sg option should change its name to : 新加坡简体 , and zh-my option with the name 大马简体
May 4 2018
Well, it seems that not only accounts that are based in enwp being brute-forced, but also in zhwp.
Apr 8 2018
Apr 6 2018
Mar 19 2018
One more example at zhwp: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:白布飘扬, there is still a redlink which shouldn't occur.
Dec 1 2017
The release did not fix the title problem. Please refer to the following link: https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5&variant=zh-hant&useskin=timeless
Please confirm it with others of Traditional Chinese Editors.
Nov 28 2017
As stated by Aklapper, that is the problem.