Also see the last succesful RFC on Commons closed by a crat with a 71% consensus: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Partial_blocks
As a Commons admin, I think any percentage greater than 2/3 means the proposal is most probably accepted. The German Wikipedia uses the same 2/3 threshold for its RFAs, as far as I know.

Pinging the last three persons who have worked on the extension @thiemowmde @Umherirrender @kaldari.

Here is the first uploaded file to the South Azerbaijani Wikipedia: File:Yüklə.svg.

Thank you @Urbanecm

@Urbanecm, I provided a link to the EDP of AZBWP on the description of this task. Please confirm the patch.

In T248971#6014309, @RhinosF1 wrote:

@4nn1l2: You’ve assigned yourself, are you going to work on this?

In T230614#5658832, @Huji wrote:

Yes, that is the correct output. Somehow it did not register for 4nn1l2 that these are the same format as what he attached.

The results should be something like

In T230614#5656538, @Huji wrote:

I think I was told last time that the tally cannot be run on wiki (the Shulze model is a bit involved, and PHP will run out of time)

In T230614#5649258, @Ajraddatz wrote:

I have the electionadmin userright, but I think I need to be added as an admin for that specific campaign before I can see that data. I only see time, username, and domain at the moment.

In T230614#5649060, @Ajraddatz wrote:

Hello, I have no access to CU information on votewiki. Is this intentional?

In T237177#5639347, @AlexisJazz wrote:

Btw: dewiki does NOT use T: for template.

Nobody said that. German Wikipedia does use P: for Portal and H: for Help namespaces.

In T237177#5637495, @Masumrezarock100 wrote:

Yes, but those are small wikis

German Wikipedia is definitely not a small wiki.

@Masumrezarock100 If German Wikipedia can use P: for Portal and H: for Help, why can't Commons use T: for Template? Besides, English Wiktionary, Hindi Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia, Italian Wiktionary, Russian projects (Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikiquote, etc), Chinese projects (Wikipedia, Wikiquote, etc), etc already use T: for Template.

We should have stuck to the original proposal, i.e., T: for Template. T: is not a language code nor a Wikimedia project code.

@Zoranzoki21 @Zache @Urbanecm
After making the patch, I noticed that nys was added to MediaWiki in January 2018 (T182305). It should be removed from both Commons and Wikidata (See T127858 for its addition task). Should I amend the current patch, or should I open another Phabricator task? Please advise.

I saw no problems at fawiki either on Firefox or Chrome, logged in or logged out. Maybe it's related to a particular OS.

Fawiki holds its elections on Votewiki too. Please see T230614. We will need SecurePoll working from late October until early November. Thanks.

@Urbanecm Thank you!

Done by @Trizek-WMF here.

@MaxSem, Yes. I personally ran the bot for three days and all edits were good. The edits by Community_Tech_bot looks good too.

Filters 149 and 150 on Commons disabled and deleted.

I can't understand why this ticket has been hindered.
The following is a list of Iranian websites which have been added to the whitelist by my request:

• Nasimonline.ir T203371
• Yphc.ir T201237
• Karbobala.com T201236
• Farsnews.com T200872
• Mehrnews.com T213961

And two other websites by another user's request:

• Tasnimnews.com T134472
• Khamenei.ir T134472

How and why is Mojnews.com different?

@Liuxinyu970226 Could you please explain your comment above?

In T213901#4917941, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:

@Doostdar and @Mardetanha LGTM to you both? Because, in my memories, some Iranian "public domain" or CC BY(-SA) websites are also problemic due to illegal forking from US states' governments.

Side note reported.

@Framawiki Confirmed. Thank you.

In T211464#4918526, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

Uploads-via-URL for Commons are already restricted to a pretty small set of users (sysop, extended-uploader, bot, and Image-reviewer).

In T214741#4913032, @Ammarpad wrote:

You seem to be contradicting yourself here. I reiterated that non-admin cannot edit/create any page mediawiki namespaces, but you claim you did.

In T214741#4911659, @Ammarpad wrote:

I can't edit, neither create the page or similar pages,

@Ammarpad Please try to do some translations on Wikidata yourself: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&action=page&group=agg-Interface_messages&language=ha&filter=%21translated

I couldn't upload https://media.mehrnews.com/d/2018/12/15/4/2984492.jpg from mehrnews.com (link to the gallery page).

OK, I found out what had happened.

پوب is wrong. بوپ is correct.

In T211827#4856171, @MusikAnimal wrote:

Topviews now has yearly data for 2017 and 2018: https://tools.wmflabs.org/topviews/?project=zh.wikipedia.org&date=2018 and I'll be adding 2016 shortly.

In T211827#4852637, @MusikAnimal wrote:

The file produced by Tbayer's query is too big to upload to Phabricator, apparently, so I've attached each requested wiki below. All credit goes to Tbayer and Milimetric for collecting this data! I just ran the query they wrote :)

In T212830#4852555, @Aklapper wrote:

Which editor is this about? What is the full, complete error message (except for IP addresses)?

Results are out: ویکی‌پدیا:انتخابات هیئت نظارت/دور نهم/نتایج

@jrbs Please enlighten us whether or not the election was encrypted. I personally think that encryption is NOT a must for fawiki elections.

@Huji As far as I know the election was not encrypted, so scrutineers can also tally the results. Am I right?

@alanajjar and @revi, we need you to look at the list of voters carefully after voting period ends. As admins of the election, you can see the IP address and user-agent information of voters. You should be vigilant of any suspicious activity, and strike votes if necessary. We, coordinators, may also ask you to strike some votes in exceptional situations (such as votes by blocked users). Then, you should tally the results by visiting https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll (last item), give us the results to publish them at Persian Wikipedia, and finally, you should certify the results by signing at the results page (example). There is also a verbose guide page at the English Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your service.

In T207560#4705281, @jrbs wrote:

I will say that it would be ideal to get more lead time in future for these elections, since we have to move things around to make time for it. :)

We will make sure to have at least one week for configuring the SecurePoll in the future.

@jrbs The right to edit the election should also be given to the scrutineers. Huji and I will remove ourselves as admins of the election before voting starts, but scrutineers will obviously keep the right.

I have already contacted @jrbs asking him to create an account for @revi on votewiki as the scrutineer of the elections and to unblock my own account there. I will serve as the coordinator and I need to double check everything myself. Last year, when I was partially absent, vote page was in a mess (at least in the first day of voting period).