No plans to work on this. Removed myself from assignee.

Ok. Thanks for lighting fast fix for this @Vgutierrez!

@Halfak The campaign seems to be finally completed. Few labels left because the revisions are deleted.

I think the models have improved from the summer 2017. From my experience the damaging model doesn't do much if any false positives, which I think is a good thing. But in the other hand it does a lot of false negatives. So it doesn't detect damaging edits properly. Far as I know goodfaith model is just not very accurate as it makes both false positives and negatives.

Is here way to edit CodeMirror's textarea and check is CodeMirror enabled?

Thank you, looks good. As I thought that workset thing was some kind of feature:)

Of course not final solution but temporary solution. Finnish Wikipedia does have the same problem and there is a bot to purge pages once per hour that contains "data.schemaVersion must be a number" to keep number of these red error texts low as possible.

Perhaps you could use a bot to purge the articles in it.wikipedia if it's becoming a problem?

We had very small discussion about this and now later on I explained what situation is in that same discussion. And now looks like there ain't going to be much volunteers to use this. So I think there is no need for this tool and I'll close this ticket.

Translation of "Edit quality (20k sample)" would be "Muokkauksen laatu (20k otos)".

I added few words more. I think it's now ready to be encoded to modeling library.

I have sorted the word list. Does it look like ok?

Finnish does already have word list, but it's 8 months old. So will we need new word list or are we fine with the old one?

Okay. Thank you anyway.

The script is kind of archiving bot, it's under development, and I want to debug it. In fact I could just clear the page, but if I could have permissions to delete page it would be better, because then I can make sure it fully works.
Sysop permissions are the exact permissions.
I asked permissions for deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org, because I thought it would be more like right place to try these kind of stuff.
But if it's okay to try the script on test.wikipedia.org, then I'll do it there, and if you're going to give permissions, I would like to get permissions to my test.wikipedia.org account instead of deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org.
test.wikipedia.org user: https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:4shadoww

Thank you for fast reply. I need rights for script testing. It would be easier to test script if I would be able delete that page what script creates.