No I am not sure. But perhaps @Slaporte (who seems to have been involved in setting it up) knows?

Regarding the first open question. I imagine this would be a manual opt-in. I wouldn't want to be signed up somewhere unless I specifically asked. For me, there might be 5-10 such pages on Swedish Wikipedia (and possibly similar on other wikis), but once set, I don't think it will ever change. With an exception perhaps for Meta, where these kinds of pages pop up regularly.

I can report that it has been a smooth setup and that the dashboard is public at: https://matomo.wikimedia.se/index.php?module=CoreHome&idSite=7

Just a notice that this problem seems to be global. Compare https://maps.wikimedia.org/#9/59.3370/17.6214 with https://maps.wikimedia.org/#10/59.3370/17.6214 (in Sweden).

The time correlates to the last edit on https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/37

Thanks for adding that perspective Nikki. I guess it is too hard to configure variabilities for different languages. Instead we could start with a simple control on import: "We found several forms spelled exactly the same on some lexemes. Please uncheck the ones that are not pronounced the same as the first one." This would also probably be helped by showing grammatical features so that it is easier to know if they are pronounced differently but I think we could try it even without that.

Which is this one (and variants are linked from it): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Accessibility_logo.svg

If that is common, then the ExternalTools that feeds the word list need to be remade, because when I tried to load all the forms for L46694 I only got the possibility to record six files out of the eight possible forms. However, at least in Swedish I don't think it occur at all.

In T284293#7134500, @Infovarius wrote:

What if other forms have "same spelling" but different pronunciation? (homographs but not homophones)

I got sidetracked but intend to finish this soon. I got to starting the tool: https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/id/shuffle
The only(?) thing left is to move the files.

Here is my draft if anyone wants to improve it. I submit it under CC 0.

Should this perhaps move to the Social events column on the board?

Opt-in or opt-out seems like a small deal, since whatever the default is, it is so easy to change it. I would prefer opt-out because that means that people might get aware of the feature (not everyone go look at the notifications settings regularly).

My take is: yes, yes, very.

My perception is that two hours is the total timeframe for solving the queries. The fun and challenging part was to solve them under time pressure. To make questions that will take days to solve will be unreasonably hard. The kickstart could be 5 minutes long.

The test in the timeless skin doesn't work (but I don't know why).

I was so confused by this news. Isn't it a template that can be collapsed (which contains sections), rather than actually collapsing sections?

In T166094#6880079, @Multichill wrote:

You don't understand. The description array is empty for *every* file on Commons. It's not used at all. So if we technically need a place to store this in a multilingual way, it's still available (fresh in your words). In the user interface you can call it whatever you like.

In T166094#6878327, @Multichill wrote:

No we don't, captions are just labels, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/M96527.json . Description is currently unused in SDOC.

Well, then we need a new field for the caption. They are not meant to solve the same problem and should almost always be different from each other. So for every image it would be very useful with two separate text fields.

It can certainly be done as a subtask as it would be valuable even without the following addition. But I guess this task is dependent on such a query to be able to know the exact forms to add the files to, so it needs to be connected as a blocker.

The simplest solution that would still be hugely valuable would be to feed LinguaLibre with forms of lexemes (preferably through a query), get to record the forms in the regular interface, and then after they are uploaded the files get added with pronunciation audio (P443) on the respective form.

Should this be reopened since Space has been abandoned?

PeerTube got support for live streams in its latest release a week ago! Since it is open source, this is a possible way forward.

Wouldn't it be better to edit this through the API than a bot? The tool already asks for Oauth. This has a few advantages, I can get credit/blame more directly and I can also immediately inspect the edit (If I have to wait for the bot, I might forget it).

In T21906#6681654, @Pigsonthewing wrote:

I asked you to clarify what you mean.

How about I add a table to the results section? It could have a column per "channel" and try to fill it with as much analytics data the platforms let me retrieve.

Suggestion: remove all points that are better suited in an email. We don't need a meeting just to share information.

It doesn't really matter what the English Wikipedia Manual of Style says, since this is something that affects all the projects and anything added could be overwritten locally. If it's has an argument of great weight, that should be added into this thread so that no one need to guess what on that page is vaguely referred to.

Then please explain why then in this thread, because that's what the English Wikipedia manual of style seem to suggest.

@Pigsonthewing Are you arguing that making sure that there absolutely is no alt-text is better than one which is easy to locally override and that only might be slightly off-topic?

Our Teahouse was set up to have new messages at the top, but the help panel questions are appended to the bottom. Is that possible to change?

@Aklapper Meet doesn't store the video for later viewings, and also don't allow anyone to view without being part of the meeting. So Jitsi is great for a many to many conversation (well, except "many" only applies for very small values of many, meetings with over 30 people usually break down). This is meant to be more of a broadcasting, where one person livestreams to potentially thousands of viewers.

For copyediting you can also add Mall:Städa, Mall:Fackspråk, Mall:Prosa and Mall:Fluff. I'll keep looking for something like adding links.

Sorry, I was too caught up in some other things so I missed to understand the deadline. We could really have used some more time since we haven't really discussed when to enable it yet. I'll make some announcements and we'll have to take it from there.

Pretty cool! Can we get a few photos on Commons?

Not sure if on purpose, but the linked document is not publicly available. Perhaps it can be copied to the wiki if it's finalized already?

In T258176#6367361, @Jopparn wrote:

Me and Jenny discussed where to buy t-shirts and I shared the https://shop.spreadshirt.se/wikimediasverige/

I've noticed the same bug in campaign 77. If I look at the stats not all are there it shows 39, but says the total is 113: https://isa.toolforge.org/campaigns/77/stats but when I download the csv, all contributions are shown.
Also, it doesn't show on the first page, which lead to participants being confused on what they were doing wrong.

I was particularly thinking about help pages about the Growth extension. Perhaps the Feature summary is a good start.

I've reached out to all the mentors on sv.wiki, and all seem positive. However, it's the middle of the summer which means that Wikipedia has a lower priority so we are moving a bit slow. One question though, which pages do you recommend to use as help pages on Swedish Wikipedia? All the ones from mediawiki listed here?

I just noted today that it also doesn't seem to count edits on Lexemes (namespace 146) on Wikidata.

Can't this just be solved by the thumbtime parameter as described in Setting a video thumbnail image?

Where are the aliases supposed to be translated? In the Mediawiki namespace on svwiki?

We don't use the Help namespace on svwiki, all help articles are in the Wikipedia namespace.

What from mw:Jade would be useful on a Wikipedia:Jade page?

Sure! I'll start translating.

I think what I asked for has been completed, so I will close this task and move to Done. Feel free to start new tasks for improvments.

Nice, I ported it to svwiki: Modul:Json2table.

In T252307#6122015, @Jarekt wrote:

I did not see mxn posts and wrote Template:Json2table. It has a lot of styling and formatting options.