I cannot remember that being explicit, but of course it was talked about. However, I don't think any of them became members earlier than 2014.

Just to give you a heads up. On svwiki there is now discussion on bot editing in a dummy header as a work around of this problem since the issue seem to have so low priority that it will not get solved quick enough. 40 000 talk pages are estimated to get such an edit.

Nope. I am not really involved in the GLAM sector actively right now.

Import made in these:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/OR/7d03a1b7ae/
https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/OR/2b107fb981/
https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/OR/8f41bc870a/
https://tools.wmflabs.org/editgroups/b/OR/a9a443aaca/

Thanks to outstanding tenacity and endurance by Cicilia, this was completed tonight!

I am attending as a mentor so do not intend to work on this myself.

Here is the equipment that we used at Wikimania: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IjvIy1t8UbjmOiaTflRrDWuQR8qnShbT66UGBv3gJZ4/edit?usp=sharing
What we borrowed from the technology pool can be seen here: https://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Projekt:Teknikpool/L%C3%A5nelista
I would suggest to borrow the Dell Laptop since that's the most powerful one and can handle the livestreaming easiest.

I would also suggest starting with a simple input box like the "Mute user" one on the notifications tab. And put it on the same tab as well to keep everything together.

No, I don't know the status of it anymore.

Well, as i understand it, Scholia has many different aspects that each are tailored for a specific use. It would probably be almost trivial to add views for politicians, motions, and political subject. I would suggest to actually propose that to Scholia to get their views before planning to build a tool.

Why "a tool similar to Scholia" and not just Scholia?

In T77154#826230, @MingleTerminator wrote:

General question: Do we want to communicate differently about different kinds of files?

It ended up here: https://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Projekt:J%C3%A4mst%C3%A4lldhet_p%C3%A5_Wikipedia_2015/Diversity_conference_2017/Streaming

Alright, I'll fix during Easter. By the way, there is a learning pattern: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Learning_patterns/IRL_video_broadcast_is_a_winning_horse._Can_Wikimedia_projects_bet_on_it%3F

In T220369#5118670, @Sebastian_Berlin-WMSE wrote:

That would be great. Could you add it as a subpage to https://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Video, called "Strömma" or something? Both the hardware setup (cameras, mics etc.) and the software you used would be good to have.

I didn't document it anywhere yet. But if you want me to I could. Just tell me where.

These are the tasks I mentioned: T185192 and T183136. they were both the outcomes from a 3D workshop, and there are a lot more ideas hiding in the annoted post-it notes linked from the first task.

If sorting on creation timestamp is solved, could also an option for last touched be added? It would help tremendously when doing edits in multiple articles based on search results. It is requested in T40403.

Sadly, I don't know more.

@Halfak Are there any previous announcements in English I could use as a template for writing an announcement on the Swedish village pump?

Commonskategori: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Journeys_Through_Our_Fragile_Heritage_exhibition_at_Riksantikvarie%C3%A4mbetet,_Visby

Perhaps link to our blog post, triggered by the event, but also with a larger view on the copyright issues.
http://www.k-blogg.se/2018/01/15/upphovsratten-undervisningen-3d-modellerna-och-tillgangligheten/

We need to sort out who presents what

Is this a blocker for T3790? I wonder since it is not marked as such.

GoTo10 has approved our request.

Yes, good idea. I created a subtask: T183231 for the invitation.