Unassigned per onwiki conversation.

per discussion

In T221440#5165111, @thcipriani wrote:

Updated your account in the DB, please reopen if that does not resolve your issue.

Hello Pginer-WMF, first I have to apologize for my tone / harsh words, I do hope we can work together in the future.

This will be my last comment (until the community consensus is respected), I'm a bit fed up of these replies, just a suggestion, DO NOT SUPERVOTE COMMUNITY CONSENSUS. Good bye.

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prancis_Vichy this one

This is frustrating, I don't have time to watch all these garbage translations, and its known fact that Machine translation have been garbage for long time. If its said only 9% of them got deleted, its because the deletion tag is still there or the report (nomination for deletion) is still there and had not been processed, as I previously said, we don't have enough time to deal with garbage translation. Most of us still busy with writing our own articles. I plead to you please just remove the machine translation , the community have spoken and decide to not use it at all, the consensus is clear. Thank you.

Same problem to me Aldnonymous / Aldnonymous4@gmail.com can't log in with return msg "name already in use."

Hello, and sorry, the concern is valid. We just don't have enough hand to monitor and fix those translation, this already crippled more than half of our editors, instead of creating articles now they seems to only fix bad translation. The articles that got translated by translator is not expert in the subject they try to translate, the editor who fixing it are also not expert for the articles subject. Even after fixing the translation the article quality is so sub-par about +30% of them got deleted. The user who keep trying to make these bad translation in the end, got blocked due either for bad translation, miscategorized vandalism and/or crosslanguage disruption, and there are countless of them. I don't want to see this happen. The deletion and blocking keep continued to this day, and I am powerless to stop this. Again, sorry and thank you for replying back to us, I hope this problem will be resolved in the future.

Same problem happened here https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tech/News/2019/15#Something_is_wrong

Internal error : [XJEYgApAAEAAAIhm1agAAACU] 2019-03-19 16:27:44: Fatal exception of type "InvalidArgumentException"

In T96542#1220439, @Glaisher wrote:

The discussion only started today so we need to wait.

Errr, I thought I already said this was cache problem, clear it and you'll be fine. I think we can close this one.

I know, and I am sorry, but I just got easily offended when people talk to me but don't want to hear my reply, I apologize.

LoL no Romaine. No, just no. Also if you subscribe and giving a comment, better stay a while so you can also hear our counter opinion, I hate one way talk like this.

Unanimous support Village pump for proposal