It seems like someone has taken care about this.

@CBogen Could you answer this question?

@Jdforrester-WMF Is this wiki still needed?

This is not a valid phabricator task. Please discuss this directly in dewiki. Your comment was already revision-deleted.

Since all other things have been changed from ombudsmen to ombuds, I think we should change the domain as well. There would be no benefit in keeping the old one altough the name of the commission has changed. On the other hand I think we can wait a few days until the new commission starts their term.

The page was already removed from the translation system by @Pppery (https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=20410051). But it seems like there have not been very many translations (https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=50&offset=0&ns1198=1&search=subpageof%3A%22Technical+Decision+Forum%2FTechnical+Decision+Making+Process%22&advancedSearch-current={%22fields%22:{%22subpageof%22:%22Technical%20Decision%20Forum/Technical%20Decision%20Making%20Process%22}}). We will just have to mark https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making for translation and then see if we can use some of the old translations (the translate extension should suggest using them, if they have the same content).

Sorry, but I do not have edit access to legal related pages on this wiki. I can just use the translation system.

Well, [[:d:Help:Monolingual text languages]] says:

I think we should proceed now. There is no further feedback by langcom since 3 months.

@jhsoby Are there any news from langcom about this?

In T216882#4982821, @Dvorapa wrote:

In other words I feel like the thing you are describing has an existing solution you haven't discovered. But I don't really understand your description (my poor english knowledge)

All pages listed here are fixed.

I have marked the page for translation again seven minutes ago, but nothing has happened.

This happened as well on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Tools/Lexicographical_data/de

Maybe this is the same as T288700

The same problem appears on betawikiversity:
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Importing_from_betawikiversity/de
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Importing_from_Incubator/de
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Basic_editing/de
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Basic_editing/fr
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Basic_editing/pl
https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Basic_editing/zh

On mediawiki.org, there is an API: namespace (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AllPages?from=&to=&namespace=104). Maybe we should think about importing these pages, once the translate extension is enabled on apiportal.

Well, it should be no problem to add / change the relevant pages in MediaWiki namespace, but I do not have the relevant user group rights (editinterface).

I have marked https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:Scholia_navigation for translation.

We still need to revert the change in beta

In the RfC there was no consensus für enabling local short descriptions.

Has this edit by @Lockal helped?

In T237191#6467282, @matmarex wrote:

In T237191#6464905, @DannyS712 wrote:

@matmarex the rights should probably also be removed from the users with blocks, since they were autopromoted due to a bug. Perhaps remove them as a developer/sysadmin action?

I could do that, but:

• Since adding/removing user rights generates notifications, I think it would be better if an admin from the local community would do it, since they'd be able to answer any questions the autopromoted users might have. It seems like a poor experience to have your user rights taken away by someone who doesn't even speak German.

• In the past there have been, to put it mildly, disagreements about governance between German Wikipedia and Wikimedia Foundation, and I'm working for the Foundation (although this task isn't really part of my job). I don't want to cause any trouble, so I'm not going to touch anything on-wiki unless someone from the German community clearly requests it from me.

I have taken a look at the last moves on german wikipedia and it seems like this problem is solved. Have there been some changes recently or does anyone know the reason why this works again?

@Udo_T I have not seen this one, but you are right. With "Drawback" we have one user who was autopromoted to reviewer as well. Seems to work good!

Thanks for your work, matmarex! I do not think that the problem is solved, because this autopromotes have just give users with review-right the autoreview-right. Normally a user with review should have autoreview as well because this is given before the review-right. On the other hand autoreview is already included in review.
It seem like there have been no autopromotes to users without review. (On german wikipedia).

In T54564#6256512, @Eugene wrote:

Is T235420 the same?