It's https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1199751.

No problem, add it. The Latin orthography wasn't used much, but it was used for some things, and they can be mentioned in values.

What to do when the same style is shared by multiple templates is less clear.

It was a lot of manual work.

Probably because it also needs to move more than one thousand subpages with translations: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex?prefix=Global+templates%2FDraft+spec&namespace=1198

Adding Notifications tag, because it appears to be related.

Done, thanks!

This is close enough to the "Making templates semantic" section in my Global templates proposal. I added a link from that page to this task.

I'd say that this may be wiki-specific, but it should also be possible to make it global.

I confirm that Galder (User:Theklan) is a trusted user and the owner of User:TheklanBot.

In T238872#5689092, @JoeWalsh wrote:

I'd vote for "Comparing two revisions of an article will show the difference between those revisions by highlighting any content that was changed."

OK, I can reproduce it in the Samsung Internet browser, and only in the desktop view on mobile.

Hmm, I can't reproduce. I tried in Firefox and in Chrome, logged in and logged out, and I don't see the problem.

@matmarex and @Schnark, thanks for the example links.

I don't think that this duplication is bad. I know about it and I find it useful for my needs.

Perhaps it could say something like "When you ask to compare two revisions of an article, the differences between them are shown".

I guess that "describing change" refers to an edit summary, but I'm not sure. Perhaps Jess or Peter will know better?

In T238252#5670851, @Pablo-WMDE wrote:

Amir did an excellent job at explaining wikidata - the video recorded unfortunately lacks sounds for the first ~2mins and cuts out early (empty battery) so I did not upload it.

... Also, how is this related to Scribunto modules? Is there a plan to mark them as balanced? It looks like a consensus is forming that before templates are fully global, it's a good idea to make modules global first. Can modules go global without implementing this Balanced templates RFC, or should the balancing be done first?

In the recent Tech Conf there was a session about onwiki tooling, which includes templates: T234661.

It cannot really be my decision, but I'd decline it.

I'm going over various template tasks old and new as a follow up to T238251, and I stumbled upon this one. Initially I wanted to close it because I thought that TemplateSandbox resolves, but then I re-read the description and understood that it's a bit different.

Should this task perhaps be gradually transitioned to the Crosswiki workboard and eventually closed?

In T211243#5605776, @Esanders wrote:

We need to add some documentation for this but to set this up you just need to copy the configuration file from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Visualeditor-template-tools-definition.json to your wiki, then change the list under "title" to be the titles of templates uses on your wiki for citation needed.

The session is done. It was very productive. Thanks to all the participants.

Participants: Grant, Adam S. , Niklas, Fisch, Petr, Tobi, Reedy, Quiddity, Galder, Tgr, Daniel, Will D., TPT, Brooke
Facilitation: Brooke
Notes: Quiddity, Niklas, Amir, TPT