It has been a month, is there anyone who can take any of the above-mentioned solutions?

I believe the simplest solution, without changing any code, is to remove the global block on this IP. It's been four to five days already, so is there anything that can be done in the meantime? For example, could someone with the appropriate permissions look into the request? It seems to have been "ignored" due to this task and its related discussions.

I just tested it out, and it turns out that even though "Special:MyContributions" can display the user's own IP correctly, on wikis other than the Meta-Wiki, anonymous users still cannot create accounts or reset passwords. I now have to redirect them to the corresponding page on the Meta-Wiki (which seems to be able to ignore the global block). I still have no solution to the issue of "users (including anonymous and registered users) not being able to edit pages."

在T335176#8801731中，@MarcoAurelio写道：

If it helps, I can reduce the block to anonymous users only, but I'd not remove the whole global rangeblock unless there are no more proxies in that range (or the proxies are in a narrower range, which we could then block instead).

在T335176#8799183中，@Umherirrender写道：

As Reedy written there is only one ip of the range now treated as trusted xff header and no block check is done for this ip. Not sure if that is the current IP used for access trough the proxy or if the proxy is using more ips for load balancing.

Let me describe the situation again.

Okay, I tried again and now the situation is different.

在T335176#8798649中，@Umherirrender写道：

The wording "globally blocked" sounds like a real global block and there is one listed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalBlockList?ip=47.243.0.0%2F16 for the range

It seems https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global is the page to request unblock of the range, with the entry to TrustedXFF it should be trustable to do so. Maybe some stewards already reading here and can help.

Addition: It is now possible to bypass the existing local blocks.

在T335176#8798993中，@Reedy写道：

In T335176#8798649, @Umherirrender wrote:

It seems https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global is the page to request unblock of the range, with the entry to TrustedXFF it should be trustable to do so. Maybe some stewards already reading here and can help.

Indeed. It's certainly not something that would be handled via Phabricator.

不传递wpCaptchaId (1 | 2) 当然会报错。

在T328397#8631007中，@Tgr写道：

Not great but login will still work because of the second-level domain cookies.

I was unable to reproduce the error he was referring to, either by accessing through wikimedia.org or wikimirror.org. I suggest he clear the cache and try again.

@Legoktm I don't know your criteria for prioritization. I just think Unbreak is more urgent than High.

Use non-globally blocked IP or confirmed right to edit also reproduced.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

Maybe can add an "editowncontentmodel" right.

phab.wikimirror -> phab.wmfusercontent, visit https://phab.mfusercontent.org/exampleORother will show same description as the IN said.

在T272790#6772389中，@AnYiLin写道：

Not WMF/Phab error. pm/email me pls.

Not WMF/Phab error. pm/email me pls.

在T272473#6762396中，@JJMC89写道：

In T272473#6762366, @AnYiLin wrote:

Have a question, Is it possible to fix this problem at the technical level, or give the right to edit fully protected page like jawiki?

There is nothing to fix at the technical level. The protection is working as intended. According to https://meta.wikimirror.org/wiki/Limits_to_configuration_changes, additional rights may not be added to interface admins.

Shouldn't the Mediawiki namespace be editable for int-admins?

Yes, and it is, but protection applies on top of the ability to edit the namespace.

Have a question, Is it possible to fix this problem at the technical level, or give the right to edit fully protected page like jawiki?
Shouldn't the Mediawiki namespace be editable for int-admins?

Or more specifically, such sites in principle should use OAuth, although i guess that's hard if the point is to evade censorship and wikipedia is blocked.

For users in mainland China intercepted by the GFW, accessing Wikimedia through a third-party reverse proxy servers (websites) is the best choice. Although a small number of them may have hidden security issues, there are always special cases that are worthy of trust . We should always have a trade-off between security and usability.