Use non-globally blocked IP or confirmed right to edit also reproduced.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

Maybe can add an "editowncontentmodel" right.

phab.wikimirror -> phab.wmfusercontent, visit https://phab.mfusercontent.org/exampleORother will show same description as the IN said.

在T272790#6772389中，@AnYiLin写道：

Not WMF/Phab error. pm/email me pls.

Not WMF/Phab error. pm/email me pls.

在T272473#6762396中，@JJMC89写道：

In T272473#6762366, @AnYiLin wrote:

Have a question, Is it possible to fix this problem at the technical level, or give the right to edit fully protected page like jawiki?

There is nothing to fix at the technical level. The protection is working as intended. According to https://meta.wikimirror.org/wiki/Limits_to_configuration_changes, additional rights may not be added to interface admins.

Shouldn't the Mediawiki namespace be editable for int-admins?

Yes, and it is, but protection applies on top of the ability to edit the namespace.

Have a question, Is it possible to fix this problem at the technical level, or give the right to edit fully protected page like jawiki?
Shouldn't the Mediawiki namespace be editable for int-admins?

Or more specifically, such sites in principle should use OAuth, although i guess that's hard if the point is to evade censorship and wikipedia is blocked.

For users in mainland China intercepted by the GFW, accessing Wikimedia through a third-party reverse proxy servers (websites) is the best choice. Although a small number of them may have hidden security issues, there are always special cases that are worthy of trust . We should always have a trade-off between security and usability.