We have been discussing these and related problems with watchlist layout on German Wikipedia, cf. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia#Kein_b%C3%BCndige_Darstellung_der_Beobachtungsliste
Tue, Dec 5
I just would like to ask whether you still consider the partnership? Thanks in advance.
Aug 28 2023
That's right, thanks. Works again for me, too. I've asked the other users who also had the same problem on dewiki. Maybe we could wait for their feedback.
Aug 25 2023
Indeed. Their website is back up now, and I can confirm that I can also access and download non-free content from SpringerLink. Thanks a lot for looking into this!
But … I wonder whether this is related to our issue or whether springerlink.com is down completely at this time … maybe we should wait a moment …
I'm afraid not. All cookies deleted, I also get an error message from SpringerLink.
Jul 27 2023
Well, we also lost the medical section in Oxford Handbooks Online.
Jul 24 2023
Jul 11 2023
Thanks. But please note that we do not have access to everything in Academic, cf., e.g., https://doi-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/med/9780190050726.003.0033 So, you might like to tell users that some content still may be missing.
May 31 2023
Well, not exactly. A meta catalogue is always inferior to the original source because information gets lost. Citoid never worked fine as long as we had only WorldCat there. No objections to additional sources, but please leave K1plus, as is now.
May 20 2023
FWIW, K10plus ISBN appears to be superior to the service provided by the German National Library, as observed in Zotero so far. So, no need for a change.
May 19 2023
After some testing in my fields of interest I just would like to thank you for this major improvement in Citoid! In fact, it's amazing, much better that what we've had before. :)
May 17 2023
I've been using Zotero for managing my personal library extensively over the years. It always used to be superior to the solution we had in Citoid. So I would second using Zotero's ISBN endpoint in Citoid. The Internet Archive cannot be better than that because the national libraries' catalogues are the reference for metadata of any book in print. I'm looking forward to the improvements you are about to implement!
Mar 25 2023
I've just encountered the said problem: My first attempt to log in to the Library failed. Access token generation failed, please try logging in again. When I tried again, it worked.
Feb 23 2023
Gladly, I can confirm that it works again for me, too. DeGruyter is back again on the Library platform. Remains to be seen why the issue appeared only in some accounts. But this may remain unsolved, as everything seems to be back ti normal. Many thanks for your assistance!
Feb 22 2023
I deleted the Library and the DeGruyter cookie before testing, and I cannot access any proprietary content on degruyter.com, either. It seems our subscription has expired and needs to be renwed. I think, it's as simple as that.
Jan 26 2023
@Samwalton9 , thanks for pinging. :) I think, it's alright now. I also posted a notice on German Wikipedia where the issue came up: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:F%C3%B6rderung/The_Wikipedia_Library#Favoriten-Funktion_defekt? So, if you would like to close the task, please go ahead!
Jan 24 2023
Favouriting works immediately for me (the number increments and the authorization is visible in the Favorites tab). Per @jsn.sherman, however, new favorites are placed at the end of the list and are only alphabetised on a page reload.
Jan 23 2023
@jsn.sherman Thanks for the fix! I've tried it out in Firefox on macOS, and it works.
Jan 11 2023
@jsn.sherman I think we can close the issue. I have not had any problems accessing Springer Link lately. Thanks, again, for your kind assistance!
Jan 10 2023
I sedond your suggestion. I just would like to add that if you should opt for a popup solution in the end could you please make it opt-in only? All such major changes to the user interface should be active opt-in, i.e. they should be switched off by default.
Jan 7 2023
Moving something to popups could be a solution. But please note that power users are prone to use Navigation Popups already, so the two should not interfere.
@Jdlrobson we are discussing re-opening this task on dewiki. Could you please have a look into this? Thanks!
Dec 16 2022
@Jdrewniak , your proposed fix to WikidataInfo has been accepted, and the sciript now works as expected:
Dec 14 2022
@Jdrewniak , thank you for looking into this and for contacting @Yair_rand both on this platform and on Wikidata. I would be grateful if you please could fix the issue before the new version of Vector 2022 goes live. Also, I had not realised yet that #contentSub is back again. That's even better.
@Jdlrobson I admit, I had to take a look into my Browser console :) Here it is:
Dec 13 2022
Nov 21 2022
So, I have closed Firefox, renamed my profile, and restarted Firefox again. Logged into Wikipedia and the TWL. Result: SpringerLink worked fine, and so did DeGruyter.
BTW, there is another strange issue with FF 107.0 in MacOS 12 that could be connected to this one:
Nov 19 2022
I'm sorry I did not try another browser before. When I answered your last post about an hour ago I was so much focused on enumerating and re-enabling my add-ons I just forgot about that.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Thanks for checking. No change here, i'm afraid. Same error message as yesterday. The problem only persists with Springer Link.
Nov 18 2022
Nov 16 2022
@jsn.sherman Would you please let me know if there is anything I can do to help find the issue.
Aug 24 2022
I'm afraid I have to correct my former post, as I've just realised that WikidataInfo now appears right below pagetitle. So it seems to work for me. Thx.
Pls cf. also these discussions on German Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia#Vector_2022_kaputt and on Wikidata for another broken script: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Yair_rand/WikidataInfo.js#Vector_2022:_Info_not_shown – help would be much appreciated. Thx.
Aug 2 2022
Jul 31 2022
Nov 24 2021
I think this bug report could do with a bit of attention, couldn't it? Thanks.
Sep 18 2021
Thanks. But you might remember the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and the part about the planning charts that had been on display somewhere around Alpha Centauri for some fifty earth years without anyone ever realising it? ;)
Sep 17 2021
I strongly agree with my fellow users from German Wikipedia. We are very much used to this feature which is rather useful for reading and writing long articles. Also I have no issues as to website performance etc. Please keep this feature.
Sep 12 2021
May 25 2021
Same here. Seems to be working again. Thanks a lot for the quick fix!
Apr 19 2021
I can confirm that the broken main page on dewiki is due to an error in discussion tools. :(
Mar 29 2021
+1. It would make it so much easier to edit Wikipedia, and it would also give back power to the editors who are not content with what the machines do automatically.
Oct 6 2020
Yes, the second scrollbar remains visible when I open the main page of German Wikipedia in Firefox 81.0.1 on macOS 10.13.6.
Sep 18 2019
Jun 11 2019
For the record: I could use drag and drop with a footnote tonight for the first time again. :)
May 21 2019
It is the same after updating to Firefox 67.0.
Mar 5 2019
I am sorry to say that the issue has come up again on Geman Wikipedia, so I have reopened the task for re-evaluation. @Cirdan has made a good point in describing the issue and the solution for dewiki above. In the meanwhile @Crazy1880 pointed out to an entry in OCLC that of course does contain the OCLC number, but not an ISBN. In German-speaking countries we rarely refer to OCLC ids. Also, we rarely use WorldCat, we prefer the catalogues maintained by our national libraries that issue ISBN and ISSN for German-language publications. So, I subscribe to Cirdan's description and I would be grateful if you please could change configuration accordingly.
Feb 19 2019
Just to make sure: This worked before, and it only happens in JSTOR, no other resource is affected. I did not change anything about the local configuration.
Feb 18 2019
Jun 5 2018
May 17 2018
Am 18.05.18 um 00:05 Uhr schrieb Denny:
Copyright has to be about some concrete expression.
May 14 2018
Am 14.05.18 um 22:36 Uhr schrieb Nemo_bis:
But law is a matter of quality rather than size.
But quantitative indicators can be a proxy for quality. A dataset with
just 200 statements has most likely been produced by dozens or hundreds
of entities none of which can claim any meaningful exclusive right.
Am 14.05.18 um 17:23 Uhr schrieb Nemo_bis:
But I'd argue that nobody would see such a dataset as problematic,
especially because it's so small (few hundreds data points).
Am 14.05.18 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb TomT0m:
The more I personnaly dig into this questions, the more issues are
opened and the less clear it becomes that there is an actual issue, and
if there is an actual issue if there is a legal risk. Or even if there
is a moral or ethical issue: I think we will all agree here that pure
facts can be used by anyone (beyond private life one).
May 13 2018
Am 13.05.18 um 13:43 Uhr schrieb Simon_Villeneuve:
May 11 2018
Please note that there is not one copyright law. There are as many copyright laws as there are legal systems Wikipedia and Wikidata content can be retrieved from.
May 9 2018
Apr 11 2018
@Esanders I have restarted Firefox on El Capitan with a fresh profile, and I have switched off auto hypenation on Meta Wiki. No changes, I'm afraid. :( Strange that it seems to work for you... Again, thanks for looking into this!
Apr 4 2018
Thanks for testing, @TBolliger ! Meanwhile I have upgraded to Firefox 59.0.2, still on El Capitan, and it still looks as bad as it was before on my machine:
Mar 28 2018
Yes, I run FF ESR 52.7.3 on El Capitan, and given that the release is already there tonight (is it?), I'm sorry to say that nothing has changed. :(
Mar 20 2018
Here is an example of what it looks like with me.
I'm afraid it is even worse than it was before. Text now looks blurred etc. even immediately after switching on syntax highlighting on my system (same as above, now FF 52.7.2 ESR). When we started out the effect appeared only when you began to enter some text in the editor...
Feb 9 2018
Because of the recent renaming of this task by @TBolliger I'd like to point out once again that this is not only an issue concerning Chinese text, but also latin scripts and fonts.
Jan 14 2018
I second the suggestion to introduce a switch for the template an author deems fit for a citation.
Jan 13 2018
I can confirm the issue with Firefox ESR 52.5.3 under El Capitan on German Wikipedia, i.e. no Chinese fonts, but monospace, viz. Courier. It first showed up right after T175223 was implemented. I am sorry that I didn't have the time since then to open another task. As was mentioned before, I have also found it helpful to toggle syntax highlighting, or to undo an edit in order to get rid of the blurry fonts. Also, it seems to make a difference whether you start typing underneath some text, e.g. on a talk page (more apt to show the fault), or whether you start editing in the middle of a text.
Jan 5 2018
I forgot I also have to change the status of this task in order to have it reviewed again.
Jan 4 2018
Shortly before I pass into the weekend I would like to thank you for applying the fix I requested.
Dec 15 2017
Dec 7 2017
Dec 2 2017
The more I work with VE and the new wikitext editor the more I get used to tools like citoid. For the time being, I switch from VE for creating a citation to wikitext for removing the ref tags in the Further Reading section.
I think the suggestion by @ManosHacker would be a good idea to start with.
I suggest to raise the priority of the task because it is really important to expert authors, as @Sadads has already pointed out.
I have opened a discussion on German Wikipedia.
Mar 22 2015
This is just to let you know that I can confirm that—for the time being, at least—I have been able to use OTRS with IPv6 disabled in Firefox, or in OS X Mavericks, for that matter.
Mar 12 2015
Today, I have got the advice to set network.dns.disableIPv6 in Firefox about:config to "true".
Feb 23 2015
Please note that the case of dual IPv4/IPv6 addresses is indeed one main problem we reproduced some weeks ago in issue T88224 which was soon closed and marked as a duplicate to this ticket. Such broadband connections are provided per default in this country.
Feb 17 2015
Please note that we have tried this out in
Feb 13 2015
I just would like to say that some of us have not been able to work in OTRS at all, including myself. I keep being logged out after some minutes, on some occasions after a few clicks, while the scenarios you are discussing are rather hypothetical, if I may say so.