Has the move been delayed?

I don't think there would be much issue with making the comments read only with LQT. But yes for some recent ones, like those newer than a month or so, can be moved to archive pages.
If I am not misunderstanding, those read only LQT pages can also be converted to wikitext, right? If so, then the case for not moving them becomes stronger for me. @Pppery has suggested a bot to help with that wikitext conversation process.

Most of the recent comment namespace pages don't actually have any comments, most of them are empty. So, can we just remove the {{#useliquidthreads:1}} from there? I think converting them directly to Flow (and then from Flow to wikitext) would be a better approach. I don't have any particular objection to moving them to an archive either.

@Gryllida : I have made the edits to the template. Please take a look.

Hi, @Gryllida can you provide some examples of pages or maybe older revisions of pages where this issue is visible? To be clear, the copyright checker link will only appear if the talk page of that article exists. (to chnage this condition we need to update the template)