Apr 26 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tor_(anonymity_network)&oldid=951928262&diff=cur&diffonly=0&diffmode=source is another example of the original problem I just suffered. It should have been auto accepted but wasn’t.
Nov 17 2019
You’ve misunderstood. See this real life use case of the template from just hours ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Canadian_federal_election&oldid=926555828#Possible_Target_Seats . According to the documentation for said template, the template should read “This article possibly contains original research. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed”. However, the “Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page” part is missing.