Hello @Majavah,
I will love to become core maintainer of wikimedia/portals. You can allow me+2 access for this repo.
@Jdrewniak Thanks for it. :)

In T301060#7686363, @abhigya_pandey wrote:

Hello @Bharatkhatri351
I would like to work on this task.
I think we need to fix that hyperlink which can redirect user to this link

Please provide me repository link.

Yaa it will allow updates in future but not for now because this patch is only related to html,css and img things.
This portal is under construction.

In T278869#7104874, @Nemo_bis wrote:

The main aim of this project is that all the sister portals use the same build system and resources.

Have you asked those projects whether they want to?

In T278816#6970262, @Helix17 wrote:

@Bharatkhatri351 Okay, so the change has been made but it's not updated on the production level.

Hello @Luensu1959
Thanks for you concern
As far as i know the build of portal
At the time of production build of wikimedia.org all templates compile into a single html file and that file is hosted on server.
As you can see in above screenshot Lìgure language is present in 10,000+ group in localhost it's mean every thing is working fine.
It will be updated soon at time of next production build.
If you have any query remains let me know. :-)

In T262783#6967643, @VrushtiMody wrote:

I'd like to work on this. @Bharatkhatri351 you mind if I give it a shot?

In T262658#6967565, @Tsiruot wrote:

@Bharatkhatri351
No one claimed this task at the time I started working on it. Plus, you unassigned yourself a few days back.
It is always better to ask first mate :)
Anyhow, I will continue with the work.

But I have never assigned this task for me i was working on this normally my fault But No worry You can work on it if you have assigned it:)
Go for it ...

In T262658#6967502, @Tsiruot wrote:

Hey @Bharatkhatri351 , It'd be appreciated if you could ask people if they're working on a task already because it creates a room for merge conflicts sometimes. Also, I have been working on this (claimed the task) :)

hello @Iniquity i just see your proposal. In this proposal you mentioned font sizes are not according to the style guide.
Can you tell me the present scenerio if still these changes are required. I would love to work on this.

In T278035#6932876, @Saudshaikh99 wrote:

can someone please explain to me the process of Review code review, I created pull requested and I got this message " Hi @saudshk99,

Thank you for contributing to Wikimedia! This Github repository is a read-only mirror.
The project uses Gerrit for code review.
Please submit your pull request to Gerrit, so your code changes can be reviewed."
and suddenly pull request closed

This task should wait until a separate config.js file has been created as part of T277405.

In T274886#6913984, @Tsiruot wrote:

@Jdrewniak I tried to implement this and it is working fine. But the lines of code have increased significantly.

This will find all the files in /cache directory, options is an object for cwd
glob('*', options, findFiles)

This will find stats of all the files. Notice the resolvePath() for absolute path.

function findFiles(err, files) {
		if(err) console.log(err);
		else {
			files.forEach(el => {
				fs.stat(resolvePath(el) , findStats.bind(this, el));
			})
		}}

This will check number of days that have been passed since the file was last modified.

	function checkStats(stats) {
		var days = ((Date.now() - stats.mtime.getTime()) / (24*60*60*1000));
		if(days > 2) return true;
		else return false;
	}

This will delete the file from the directory.

	function deleteFile(el) {
		fs.unlink(resolvePath(el), (err) => {
			console.error( 'Error deleting old cached stats', err );
		});
	}

This might not be the best approach but just a rough implementation

Also, the resolvePath() function

	function resolvePath(file) {
		var p = path.resolve(__dirname, '.' , 'cache', file);
		return p;
	}

Hey @Iniquity

In T255711#6915487, @gerritbot wrote:

Change 672527 had a related patch set uploaded (by Bharatkhatri; owner: Bharatkhatri):
[wikimedia/portals@master] Closing of border line and container in not smooth

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/672527

In T255711#6910950, @gerritbot wrote:

Change 671632 had a related patch set uploaded (by Bharatkhatri; owner: Bharatkhatri):
[wikimedia/portals@master] Too large link's area in 'Other project' section on wikipedia.org

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/671632

hey,
@Jdrewniak
I have moved "helptask" to help.js..kindly review the changes.

In T277405#6912058, @Tsiruot wrote:

@Bharatkhatri351 We could discuss about it on Zulip

ok good idea...

In T277405#6912019, @Tsiruot wrote:

@Bharatkhatri351 I am sorry if it felt unfair to you. I have already submitted two patches for other tasks and now I have also started working on this task. Like @Jdrewniak said this task can be divided into multiple patches, so let's work together on this task and get it done :)

Hey, @Tsiruot i want to work on this task as i observed. you claimed three of the task @Jdrewniak without submitting the patch for it .....Which i think is not a good practice. every one want to contribute..
Thanks : )

its feel great to solve issues..:)

In T273179#6905792, @Jdrewniak wrote:

If anyone needs a more chat-like format to discuss this project, I created the following topic on Zulip:
https://wikimedia.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/274201-gsoc21-outreachy22/topic/portals

@Dasgupta002 you can use chat stream for your queries....

I have submit the patch again according to your need...please check it out.
I felt #eaecf0 best matches with theme..
"#eaf3ff75" this color was not going with theme and #eaf3ff is very light for a white background.
but i personally felt this hover effect not looking good on articles link. because it showing underline effect too.
But if you feel comfortable with this patch you can merge this : ) .

Hello @Gopavasanth
as this patch is merged now u can review my patch now...
i have noticed this bug is still exist in videocuttool

I have added border and padding according to your instructions...adding border created a small effect in link automatically....
please check is this effect is good for portal or i have to do some changes in it...

In T255929#6910883, @Iniquity wrote:

In T255929#6910881, @Bharatkhatri351 wrote:

Yes, in my opinion the problem has been fixed! All the same, there is no smoothness, but that's another task. Thank :)

If you want i can try to add smoothness...
what exactly do you want in smoothness if you will create a issue for it
i feel happy to work on it.
Thanks:)

It seems to me that the border disappears very abruptly. Compared to the appearance of a border. Perhaps disappearing should be started before the menu closes.

Yes, in my opinion the problem has been fixed! All the same, there is no smoothness, but that's another task. Thank :)

If you want i can try to add smoothness...
what exactly do you want in smoothness if you will create a issue for it
i feel happy to work on it.
Thanks:)