Hey @Nemo_bis, of course not, this is a mentored project. An internship is a contract between a company and an individual, with a certain amount of working time (most likely full time), salary and all other agreements that come with a contract. The main reasoning behind this project here is what I wrote in the email on wikitech-l: "Finding good tasks to work on, getting people to review your patches, or just getting good advice can be very challenging. With Season of RevisionSlider we want to provide the chance to experience all of this the easy way - together with us." - it's totally up to the people who are interested in joining this, how much they want to do - it depends on the time, fun, skills people have, and it depends on what people want to commit to as a group. I think the difference to other mentored projects is, that working as a team is a big part of it. For us this is crucial in software development: 4-eyes-principle, helping each other, sharing skills and knowledge, committing together to a project/task, and having fun by doing it. So this project is based on the assumption that working with a group, having people you can ask anything, working on tasks that will get reviewed & merged etc. might be a good way to onboard in the Wikimedia Tech world, or could be cool for people who are around for some time already, but usually work more on their own. I hope that makes it clearer (and I really would love to have a mentored-project-tag ;) I will be travelling soon, so I cannot answer directly, in case you have more remarks/questions :-)

@thiemowmde, this is the originial bug report: "When I click EditFileInfo or Info button, I get an error 200."

goat-for-it

Hey all, I've scheduled the session for Sunday 2 pm, hope that works for everyone?

In T6714#4016706, @Tbayer wrote:

There is a discussion about this at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Turn_off_extended_edit_summaries . It seems that there is a perception that this had been only discussed and decided with the German Wikipedia community, but was rolled out on other projects too. Is that accurate? If not, it may be useful to edit the task description to correct that impression (it currently says "Needs to be further discussed with: German Community" only).

I can confirm its him, too (I was in the same video call).

In T185012#3920881, @santhosh wrote:

The keynote session on Monday afternoon was between an ongoing session. IMO it affected the continuity of session. The cross project collaboration session was planned as 45 minutes but had to cut to 30 minutes because of this.

In T183318#3920975, @brion wrote:

1. refactor our recommendation system (better tools than just "easy" tag on tasks)

I'd like to kick this off and start talking to people (engineers, teams).
We will check the notes and add summary and action items (and potential owners) to the task description soon.

In T178568#3777114, @Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE wrote:

@Bmueller Would you mind putting your input from the Stockholm workshop in here? Thanks!

In T177891#3674116, @Addshore wrote:

So, the open questions while making this task:

@Bmueller @Tobi_WMDE_SW @JStrodt_WMDE As the rollout plan, do we want to go for group0, then dewiki, then group1 and then all sites? Or do we have something else in mind?

@Charlie_WMDE: Afaik this task wasn't ready to do earlier (see Gabriel's comment above), so I've asked people 1 day ago & I'm waiting for their replies.

In T170375#3635741, @WMDE-Fisch wrote:

Todo @Bmueller - Provide a text for the beta feature page with a link to the special page.

Current text there is Show the edit conflict view using a more advanced two column view.

@thiemowmde - from my perspective, the code repository could be archived unless noone wants to take over. But Teahouse wasn't a sd&e project, and therefore Teahouse is neither in our plan nor can I decide this. But I can try to get this info from the volunteer support department.