May 25 2016
May I ask when this will be done?
Apr 7 2016
That is correct. What I ment is that the version in Wikipedia needs to be replaced/updated with the current version on the website. So indeed updated.
Apr 5 2016
When will this issue be solved?
Jan 28 2016
I only agree with removing it if Old English and Latin get deleted too, otherwise the argument is flawed and discriminates between certain ancient languages.
Jan 26 2016
Jun 14 2015
Jun 13 2015
Jun 11 2015
Ok, about Font modification he says this, maybe AKlapper can translate it as his German is better than mine I think:
"Modifiziert werden kann der Font meinetwegen insoweit, als er in ein Web-taugliches Format gebracht wird. Modifikationen an den Buchstaben, die dann womöglich immer noch unter meinem Namen ausgegeben werden, möchte ich eigentlich nicht. "
I just see that he changed it to:
He didn't really know how to mention it at first and where, I recommend that if you still have doubts that you contact him personally on his website by his e-mail mentioned there to verify it.
Ok, there was a misunderstanding. He mentioned it on his German page:
After discussing with dr. Pfeffer he made his Skeirs font available for free use, commercial too. He mentions this on his website, from what I understand, it's mentioned when you hover your mouse over the download, I can't check it due to my mobile, go to:
Feb 15 2015
Feb 14 2015
Hello. I 'm the new administrator of the Gothic wikipedia and the reason why I became an administrator is because it was neglected and because too many people with a too bad knowledge of the language were managing it, I also contacted Nikerabbit about this problem. I have studied the Gothic grammar of Wilhelm Braune, Die Gotische Grammatik and I have read several parts in the Gothic grammar of Joseph Wright, I have also read parts in the Gothic Bible and I can read it quite well. First of all, the declinations and conjugations are often used completely wrong, the demonstrative pronoun which is only used in special instances as a definite article is always used as a definite article in the current interface and I would like to be able to remove these as scholars agree that the number of instances in which the dem. pron. was used as a definite article was quite low. Also compound words is one of the biggest problems, as I often see how words with a -ja stem having short syllables or long ones being turned into a compound word in the wrong way.