In T258419#6662890, @matthiasmullie wrote:

@Ramsey-WMF & @CBogen, does T258419#6621542 look good?

@Cparle should we create a new task to evaluate the results at some point?

Hi all - I noticed that the techcom notes said this was "awaiting resourcing from core API steward to confirm support, risk, compatibility as proposed." It's my understanding that we no longer need that. Is that a misunderstanding?

In T266067#6649614, @Whatamidoing-WMF wrote:

If editors aren't asking for this right now, then I'd make the tag hidden. It can always be changed later if someone wants it.

Thanks for this summary @dcausse!

The scope and purpose is definitely different, but I thought it could be useful to mention the work @Cparle did in T268252 to create a tool to assess image relevance for MediaSearch.

Looks good to me! Would be great if @egardner could take a quick look as well.

In T266067#6643377, @ppelberg wrote:

Question

• Are you able to implement this as a hidden tag [i]?
  • I ask this above considering the primary "user"/"consumer" of this tag seems like it will be staff [ii] as opposed to editors. Please correct me if this is not so!

adding @Miriam and @nettrom_WMF because we've had some prior discussions about evaluating grid results. Previously we've decided not to take position in the grid into account because there's no agreed upon way to do so, but maybe things have changed.

In T264779#6639242, @gerritbot wrote:

Change 642914 had a related patch set uploaded (by Esanders; owner: Esanders):
[mediawiki/core@master] MediaResourceProvider: Use MediaSearch API when available

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/642914

Thanks all - what's left to do to move this forward?

@ppelberg @JTannerWMF - I wanted to let you know that the SD team is planning to implement this ticket and give you the opportunity to let us know if you'd like to do code review or otherwise comment - thanks!

Thanks all - I just updated the description of the task based on the previous discussion.

In T267954#6625431, @Keegan wrote:

In T267954#6625225, @CBogen wrote:

cc @Keegan - any thoughts on this?

I agree, now that we're stable linking to the help docs would be good.

cc @Keegan - any thoughts on this?

Timeboxing investigation to 1 day.

In T263725#6623717, @Aklapper wrote:

@CBogen: AFAIK anyone should be able to edit alias hashtags, in this case at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/edit/209/
For future reference, if something doesn't work, could you please provide steps and links and error messages? Thanks. :)

@Ramsey-WMF I tested on iPhone Safari (and Mac OS desktop) and it worked fine. Could it be a Safari version?

In T257700#6600597, @matthiasmullie wrote:

Reopening for question:

Description mentions wanting to search "The full list", with a long list of namespaces.
The full list is actually missing a few pages (e.g. User, Sequence, Campaign, ...) - is there a particular reason they were omitted?

I suspect what we really want is not a predefined list of namespaces to search, but rather "all namespaces except for NS_FILE", am I right?=
(asking because implementing it that way is actually a lot safer in case namespaces change, or this gets installed on another - differently configured - wiki)