Noting Cite is the correct tag here for making a chance (if desired). I'll keep the Design-System-Team tag in case there are any questions about other potential token usage.

I believe that is a question for FlaggedRevs.

Hey @Sfaci, sorry for the late reply myself. The example you provided for the Lookup makes sense as a correct use of readonly, which should be resolved in T384256. We would continue to advocate for not trying to force a readonly state for a Select. It should either be disabled, as in the example you shared, or a different component or design should be considered instead. I'm going to consider this task resolved for now.

Hi @DG , looking at the latest demos at https://dev.vanhamel.nl/ReconciliationFront/Sitesearch, it seems like the issues you described are fixed. Am I misunderstanding the demos, or did you find a way to address them?

Closing this as it's not really an actionable task. We'll continue to keep updating the relevant documentation on mediawiki.org as things progress.

I closing this in favor of the component Epic task, which is meant to be used for the MVP scope of a new component. This task sort of ended up shaping to be the same thing, so I've moved the content to the original task. I suggest we re-estimate the new individual MVP subtasks, and spin out any tasks that are not going to be part of the MVP on their own in the backlog as follow up work.

In T383077#10551207, @Bawolff wrote:

(probably starting with non-current WMF staff, who may be harder to reach)

Perhaps you have done this already, but you might want to check with legal if this is really neccessary for former WMF employees who contributed as part of their job. I would expect WMF contracts have language allowing you to relicense under a different open source license (thst said IANAL nor have i read these contracts)

@Nikerabbit An example of the work involved: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/MultimediaViewer/+/1027559

In T373171#10549041, @Nikerabbit wrote:

@CCiufo-WMF We are planning for an ULS rewrite and unlikely to do anything for ULS in the interim. If you have deadline for codex-search removal, please let us know.

Timeboxing an investigation to 2 pts

@Jdforrester-WMF We're exploring what we can do on the Codex side to address the remaining issues in T383788.

Okay, I'm able to reproduce the task description issue on Firefox at https://test.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:Block. We'll take a look when we get a chance.