Hey @Lydia_Pintscher since this is not part of any project that UX has allocated resources for, this will probably not be picked up by us. That being said I'd be happy to find a working mode for these types of "maintenance" tickets and how to handle them in the future. I will raise all these points in the next team meeting and get back to you. My assumption is that this will require a little bit of PM<>UX communication to find a good working mode.

yay, looks awesome \o/ @Lydia_Pintscher good to go from my side

Hey @Botoxparty I just had a look at the link.

looks good. i'm just not sure why the column headers are displayed in such a large font (at least in firefox)

behavior seems fine. the lack of border on focus and not being read by the screen reader should be fixed.

works!

cool, looks good then!

@bete it's great but now the improvement from earlier T274273 was undone. could you take a look? Or was that change worked on a branch that doesn't include the other improvement yet?

awesome! \o/ leaving open so product to have a look too

yay, works for me! but would love for someone else to double check with some more examples. (i checked the example above and instance of cathedral located (P131) in france).

lookin good

@Michael added it as an AC to the ticket description

looks good from my side. will wait for @Sarai-WMDE to close it in case i'm missing smth

In T275189#6848493, @Ladsgroup wrote:

If it's going to be a subpage of wdqs, we can't change the favicon for production. For toolforge, sure.

looks good!

I tested it with this link (hope that's correct)
works great!

even better than what i wanted! \o/

thanks @Ladsgroup and @Michael

yes, agree. i have made the same comment in the UI improvements ticket

Improvement C:
i forgot to leave specs for the placement of the checkboxes inside of the decorator. i added them now in the mobile mock for space reasons, but the same specs apply for desktop and they're all using the same token. let me know if this should be an extra ticket or can be done in this one

@bete thanks for the link!

seems to be working for me now with the provided test link.

@bete where can i test the bugfix?

made an extra ticket for improvement G so we can close A-F: T274754

looking good from my side
@Lydia_Pintscher @amy_rc ?

@Lydia_Pintscher I think originally we needed this ticket for the "share link to query" button. After the change I've made we instead need a "button, icon only" which we already have, so i assume this ticket can go back in the backlog for now unless i'm overlooking something.