in my opinion ticket T382267 is still not fixed completly. I think that fix would be important.

should this bug be fixed for now? Using client side MathJax. The layout of the page https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=K%C3%A4hler-Einstein-Mannigfaltigkeit&oldid=269053772 is still broken.

I would also prefere B.

in my Appearance preferences MathJax is configured for displaying math formulas but at commons. But formulas will be rendered with MathMl. In the picuture you can see the small closed curve integral. MathJax will render integrals much bigger.

In T422077#12133545, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

MathJax is used as default rendering engine for math environment

Just to clarify: this means that you have Clientseitiges MathJax-Rendering (für Browser mit eingeschränkter MathML-Unterstützung) (in English, Client side MathJax rendering (for browsers with limited MathML support)) selected in your math preferences, right?

According to https://de.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&meta=siteinfo&siprop=defaultoptions, the default value of this preference (math) is SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin) (mathml), so it’s not even that the default preference is used. Weird. (I could reproduce this on dewiki.)

@Physikerwelt
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Version

@Physikerwelt , I have no idea.

Hello, today I discovered that punctuation marks following a formula with display=block are rendered on the next line. I think that's wrong.

today I get MathMl rendering after every saving a page.

@Esanders , in the German Wikipedia, the formula is centered rather than just slightly indented. Is this because of my settings? I find the centered display a bit unusual.

I think that if we replace :<math with <math display=block, the indentation of the formula will be lost. But we should keep it. Is there actually a better way to indent a formula than using a colon?

In T382267#11636680, @Christian1985 wrote:

Hello,

I added also T375238 as a parent task. I think this is also the problem seen in the picture

The picuture is gereated from https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Integralrechnung&oldid=259297415 And I used MathJax for rendering.

The code is:

Stammfunktionen und der Hauptsatz der Differential- und Integralrechnung

{{Hauptartikel|Fundamentalsatz der Analysis}}Die Integration ist eine nicht-eindeutige Umkehrung der Differentiation. Um dies zu präzisieren, wird der Begriff der [[Stammfunktion]] benötigt: Ist <math>f</math> eine Funktion, so heißt eine Funktion <math>F</math> eine ''Stammfunktion'' von <math>f</math>, wenn die [[Differentialrechnung|Ableitung]] von <math>F</math> gleich <math>f</math> ist:
: <math>F' = f</math>

@Physikerwelt , I'm not sure. I removed the space from the german Wikipedia page and the formular looks okay. So there is no priority to fix the bug. But I think it is a bug. In a way it would be nice to document the bug, but at the moment I see no need to fix it.

Shall we close this bug ticket?

ich think this bug was solved in T418144 . Do you agree?

In T375238#11662380, @Physikerwelt wrote:

In T375238#11614182, @Christian1985 wrote:

Hello @Physikerwelt ,

yes I would say, that smallmatrix should be a bit smaller. Smallmatrix can be used inline and therefor ist to big. The fraction should also be adjusted. Not only is the c too small, but so is the first two. The fraction looks very ugly.

Thank you for adding the smallmatrix problem. Was the issue with the c resolved?

I think in the formular
:<math>\int\limits_{V} (\phi(\vec{r}\,') (-4\pi \delta(\vec{r} - \vec{r}\,')) - \frac{1}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}\,'|} (-4\pi \rho(\vec{r}\,')))\, \mathrm{d}V' = -4\pi\int\limits_V \phi(\vec{r}\,') \delta(\vec{r} - \vec{r}\,') \, \mathrm{d}V' + 4\pi \int\limits_V \frac{\rho(\vec{r}\,')}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}\,'|} \, \mathrm{d}V'</math>.
is the same error.

Hi,
the binomial coeffient is rendered huge in an align environment:

this is connected to T417373 .

I have reopened the discussion so that my point is not lost.

I have another example construkted. In the following picture is the second rendering the one with MathJax. In that second one the indices of \partial a are very hard to read in the svg version its not fine but okay.

thanks for fixing this bug.

The new MathJax rendering appears somewhat more compact in its layout. Within running text, this generally results in a cleaner and more aesthetically pleasing presentation. However, in the sections on functional analysis and tensor analysis—both subfields of mathematics—formulas frequently contain a large number of indices, including nested indices. In the more condensed format, these expressions have become noticeably harder to read.

I added also T375238 as a parent task. I think this is also the problem seen in the picture

Also the code
<math>\vec e_i{}'</math>
throws the same error.

The same Problem also occurs with integral signs.

The same problem also occures with \lim