Thankyou all :)

I still don't agree with this. Why should a crat close the proposal when the proposal is about granting crats an additional permission? I think our crats have the same thinking that's why none of them participated in the discussion. Why confirmation of crats is required? They are chosen by the community and for community, they should accept what community wants. But since sysadmins have the power to make the final decision and they want crats confirmation, I have posted a message on BN.

Ah, Apologize! 🤦

I still believe that there is consensus to proceed, 76% isn't low. Surely number of participating editors was low but as I said earlier the discussion was open for 3 months, we can't force people to join the discussion. And I really don't see why this right shouldn't be granted to our local crats, Commons is a large project, we have multiple active bureaucrats. If one misuses it then they'll be decrated, if one's account gets comprised then we have stewards/WMF available all the time to take emergency actions.

In T261481#6421807, @Rschen7754 wrote:

For the size of the Commons userbase, a relatively low number of editors (26) have taken part in the discussion.

Well, the discussion was open for almost 3 months.

Despite from what @Ammarpad said, Probably all crats are aware of this proposal, I had posted a note on BN when I opened the proposal and it was there for all the time.

https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/CptViraj
Log of 06:17, June 13, 2020 - File movers (until 06:17, September 13, 2020)

In T254963#6209839, @Aklapper wrote:

@CptViraj: Could you maybe provide two example tasks "related to Gujarati sites" and please be more specific what "related" means exactly?
I'm reluctant to have such project tags because nearly every MediaWiki code change would be "related to Gujarati sites" as the changes will be on Gujarati sites, and I don't want 300 #Language-Sites tags on half of the Phabricator tasks. Hence I'm asking for a clearer scope. :)

In T254963#6208772, @Aklapper wrote:

Hi! Could you please elaborate who plans to use that tag and how, and who plans to spend time to constantly look at new incoming tickets and add this tag? Thanks.

@Ajit_Kumar_Tiwari: Thanks for the clarification, Also RhinosF1 has asked for the project talk namespace, it should be विकिपुस्तक चर्चा right?

@Ajit_Kumar_Tiwari: Your requested name is विकिपु्स्तक but विकिपुस्तक was proposed in the discussion. If you look carefully you can see that there is a difference between पु and पु्. I guess this is a typo mistake by you, can you please confirm?