Fixed in v1.1beta4

Unable to replicate #3, seems to be fixed with number 2.

#2 fixed in v1.1beta4. The two URLs were seen as the same and treated this as a null edit and ignored it.

I have deleted that unused URL.

The URL ID sanitized on the interface is 24655054 while yours is 7065467. Based on the ID sequence, the unsanitized version is clearly an old remnant of the old bot code.

When you load via the interface, it sanitizes the URL and retrieves the correct URL ID. But when you provide the URL ID to modify, it goes straight to the target. The target already has the archive URL added to it. When nothing is being changed, it just comes back with failed.

For number one, there are duplicate entries in the DB, one sanitized and the other that isn't. :/

Looking into these now.

Number 2 fixed in v1.4beta3.

Fixed number one in v1.1beta4.

OH

Cleaning this out. The latest code has a sanity check against this. So I've run the bot on all pages this was reportedly found on, an it cleaned out all but two articles. Investigating why.

As for number 2, it should be respecting existing formatting. Not sure what happened here.

@Shizhao What's wrong with the format in number 1? It appears to show the month in Chinese. That date format on the interface is not that same as the format used on Wikipedia. Plus it understands different date formats as well.

API is live, new documentation will be up by the end of tomorrow.

Number 4 is now ready to go. These will be available in the beta3 release.

I think Number 3 is finally ready to go. I'll do some more benchmarking tomorrow, but it seems to be stable.

Cyberbot is getting the data from the API. It probably got a null response at some point and just defaulted to unix epoch 0. I haven't seen it happen since.

Number 3 is something I've been struggling with for a while. There are serious performance issues adding in this particular filter.

I've been playing around with number 2 for a bit, but I think I got a good solution. I'm tying the results into the logs, to get you your information. You can access the hidden reviewed parameter by setting the filter reviewed to either 0 or 1. This is will be in the beta3 release.

No further response.

You can also see more details at https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/index.php?page=metainfo

On the graphical interface, you can see the deployed versions of IABot and the CID library, on the footer of the site.

Number 2 has a reviewed field in the column, but it's a hidden field. It doesn't identify who did it and when, but it's only set when changed via the API or the interface. However, this can be tied into the logs that have the URL ID associated with it. Everything is heavily logged after all.

Number 1 implemented in beta3.

Very stale edit. This predated version 1.0

In regards to the first diff, it's because the wrong archive is associated with the URL. I have now fixed it in the DB. The other issues are are because of inconsistent archive URLs associated with URLs.

Fixed in 1.4beta2

Fixed in the v1.1beta3 release.

IABot can handle them if they redirect to the new URL. Otherwise, it can't know what the new URL is.

Not a bug.

I reject everything on your wishlist, because I choose to be mean. :p

If it's not recognized as a valid archiving service, it will overwrite the URL with one that is recognized, or just ignore it if it doesn't think it has anything better. That URL in the archive-url field doesn't look like a web service that hosts snapshots.

That last sentence was supposed to refer to the FaQ in the previous sentence.

Not really. The reported reason is because the bot is receiving a response from the server. So it means the bot may have been blacklisted on labs.

I think you got your links mixed up. I see no such link being changed on that article.

BTW, I need willing translators for translating the IABot interface.

Implementing this wiki now. I should hopefully have it ready in 48 hours.

Well, Wikipedia forces HTTPS. So all protocol relative URLs go to HTTPS. So the link needs to be fixed on wiki.

@Shizhao Feel free to check out https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot?wiki=zhwiki

Perfect. I'll start the bot up.

In T163869#3321900, @Shizhao wrote:

bot flag and confirmed user flag has been granted on zhwiki.

Honestly templates should not be embedded into URLs. That is the worst thing ever and no bot will ever consider a template embedded into a URL when looking for them.

In T156567#3320725, @jhsoby wrote:

Here are the translations. @Danmichaelo, please check to see if I made any mistakes or if there's anything to improve.

• Endret eksterne lenker
• Hei bidragsytere, \n\nJeg har nettopp endret {linksrescued} eksterne lenker på [[{namespacepage}]]. Vennligst sjekk [{diff} endringen min]. Om du har spørsmål eller ønsker at botten skal ignorere lenkene, eller hele siden, besøk [[m:InternetArchiveBot/FAQ|denne spørsmålssiden]] for mer informasjon. Jeg har gjort følgende endringer:\n{modifiedlinks}\nSjekk spørsmålssiden for informasjon om hvordan man kan fikse feil med botten.\n\nTakk.
• Fant eksterne lenker som trenger å fikses
• Hei bidragsytere,\n\nJeg har funnet én eller flere lenker på [[{namespacepage}]] som trenger oppmerksomhet. Vennligst gå gjennom lenkene jeg fant og rett dem i artikkelen om det trengs. Jeg fant følgende problemer:\n{modifiedlinks}\nNår du har gjort de nødvendige endringene, besøk [[m:InternetArchiveBot/FAQ|denne spørsmålssiden]] for mer informasjon om hvordan man kan fikse feil med de nevnte URL-ene.\n\nDenne beskjeden vil kun bli gitt én gang for disse URL-ene.\n\nTakk.
• Problemer med å arkivere lenker i artikkelen
• Hei. Under arkiveringsprosessen ga arkivet feilmelding for ett eller flere nettsteder som ble satt til arkivering.\nJeg har inkludert lenkene som ga feilmelding nedenfor med feilmeldingen.\n\n{problematiclinks}\nUansett vil dette være det eneste varselet angående disse lenkene, og ingen videre forsøk på å arkivere lenkene vil bli gjort.\n\nTakk.
• {link} ser ut til å være død. Anbefaler å legge til {newarchive} til den opprinnelige URL-en.
• {link} ser ut til å være død. Intet arkiv funnet.
• {link} anses for å være død, men ble funnet i live. Anbefaler å fjerne flagget for død lenke fra URL-en.
• La til arkivet {newarchive} til {link}
• Erstattet arkivlenka {oldarchive} med {newarchive} på {link}
• Rettet formatering/bruk for {link}
• La til {{malp|død lenke}}-tagg til {link}
• Fjernet død lenke-tagg fra {link}
• Endret kilde for {link}
• {problem} med feilen {error}
• Redder {linksrescued} kilder og tagger {linkstagged} som død.
• Varsel om feil som oppsto under arkivering av lenker
• Varsel om endrede kilder som trenger gjennomgang
  
  @Cyberpower678: About the line "Rescuing {linksrescued} sources and tagging {linkstagged} as dead.": Where is it used? Is it used as an edit summary? Because it could do with some {{PLURAL}} support, but I'm not sure that works in edit summaries without some additional magic.

Bot needs the bot flag. It cannot run when being blocked by the captchas.

I found the archives.

Approved and functional.

In T163869#3314051, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:

Any archive templates that link to archives?

I do not know

I don't think we the zhwiki users have enough time on certain talk: namespaces pages, but for discussion pages that under Wikipedia: namespace, here are some possibly used templates (however, it's likely that you only see source codes on VP-sth, as their usages are probably "subst:"ed):

• Template:Archives
• Template:Archive box
• Template:Archive box collapsible
• Template:UserTalkArchiveBox

@Liuxinyu970226 and @vjudge404: I'm sorry to do this, but can you retranslate the following two? I noticed there was an error in the text.

BTW, I need willing volunteers to translate the interface to the simplified and traditional variants of Chinese. It can be done at TranslateWiki.

In T163869#3317062, @Shizhao wrote:

In T163869#3314890, @Cyberpower678 wrote:

I'm surprised none of these templates have Chinese names. The idea is to have IABot integrate with all url/archive url citation templates.

some templates have chinese name redirect

I'm surprised none of these templates have Chinese names. The idea is to have IABot integrate with all url/archive url citation templates.

In the meantime, I'll work on getting IABot deployed on the Chinese Wikipedia.

In T163869#3313710, @vjudge404 wrote:

zh-hans 供参考:

• External links modified
  • 外部链接已修改
• Hello fellow editors,\n\nI have just modified {linksrescued} external links on [[{namespacepage}]]. Please take a moment to review [{diff} my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[:m:InternetArchiveBot/FAQ|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:\n{modifiedlinks}\nWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.\n\nCheers.
  • 各位维基人：\n\n我刚修改了[[{namespacepage}]]中的{linksrescued}个外部链接，请大家仔细检查[{diff} 我的编辑]。如果您有疑问，或者需要让机器人忽略某个链接甚至整个页面，请访问[[:m:InternetArchiveBot/FAQ|这个FAQ页面]]获取更多信息。我进行了以下修改：\n{modifiedlinks}\n当您检查完成之后，您可能需要按下方模板的指示来修复URL中存在的问题。\n\n祝编安。
• External links found that need fixing
  • 需要进行修复的外部链接
• Hello fellow editors,\n\nI have found one or more external links on [[{namespacepage}]] that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:\n{modifiedlinks}\nWhen you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.\n\n{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}\nThis notice will only be made once for these URLs.\n\nCheers.
  • 各位维基人：\n\n我发现[[{namespacepage}]]中有至少一个外部链接需要引起注意，请大家花点时间来检查一下这些链接，如果有必要的话请修正它们。以下是我发现的问题：\n{modifiedlinks}\n当您修改完毕时，您可能需要按照下方模板的指示来修复上面提到的问题。\n\n{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}\n对于这些链接而言，本次通知是唯一一次通知。\n\n祝编安。
• Trouble archiving links on the article
  • 存档链接时遇到问题
• Hello. During the archive process, the archive returned errors for one or more sites that I submitted for archiving.\nBelow, I have included the links that returned with an error and the following error message.\n\n{problematiclinks}\nIn any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and no further attempt will be made to archive the links.\n\nCheers.
  • 您好，在处理存档过程中至少有一个链接发生了错误。\n下面是遇到错误的链接及其错误原因：\n\n{problematiclinks}\n这是针对这些链接的唯一一次通知，未来将不再尝试存档这些链接。\n\n祝编安。
• {link} is found to be dead. Recommend adding {newarchive} to the original URL.
  • {link}已经失效，建议在原始链接中加入{newarchive}。
• {link} is found to be dead. No archive was found.
  • {link}已经失效，未发现存档。
• {link} is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
  • {link}标记为失效链接，但是检测发现仍然能够访问，建议移除URL中的失效标记。
• Added archive {newarchive} to {link}
  • 向{link}中加入存档链接{newarchive}
• Replaced archive link {oldarchive} with {newarchive} on {link}
  • 把{link}中的存档链接{oldarchive}换成{newarchive}
• Corrected formatting/usage for {link}
  • 修正{link}的格式与用法
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to {link}
  • 向{link}加入{{tlx|dead link}}标记
• Removed dead tag from {link}
  • 移除{link}中的失效链接标记
• Modified source for {link}
  • 修改{link}的来源
• {problem} with error {error} (?)
  • {problem}，错误{error}
• Rescuing {linksrescued} sources and tagging {linkstagged} as dead.
  • 补救{linksrescued}个来源，并将{linkstagged}个来源标记为失效。
• Notification of errors encountered when attempting to archive links (?)
  • 试图存档时遇到错误的通知
• Notification of altered sources needing review (?)
  • 需要重新检查修改之后来源的通知

Consensus acquired.

Consensus acquired.

Bot appears to be approved, but a trial run should be run first, and of course a trial will be done first but, before the bot can be deployed, @Danmichaelo I need some translations done.

This awaiting final approval.

@Sjoerddebruin if I can direct your attention to https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Aanmelding_botgebruikers#InternetArchiveBot. Any help would be appreciated.