Component does not support that kind of flow

This seems to work fine now. Thank you for reporting!

Actually, I am just closing it.

This seems to be fixed by now, and the issues reported are not reproducible anymore. Closing.

I think this seems resolved. Moving to triage to get it checked and closed.

I hope I am not messing up the debugging effort, but I created a code implementation ( Z28931 ) that works much faster than the previous implementation ( Z28604 ).

I think here's another example of that not working:

A few tasks which might interfere with the confidence in the system if we don't improve them: T405477, T405461, T404581

Discussed this with @DSmit-WMF , and it might be a good idea to have T404195 in mind when doing that, as there might be synergy.

Here's an example of a community member reporting this: https://cs.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wikislovn%C3%ADk%3APod_l%C3%ADpou&dtnewcommentssince=c-Mykhal-20251005143000-Mykhal-20251005142500&dtinthread=1#c-Mykhal-20251005144400-Sannita_(WMF)-20251005135500

Here are a few more pages that can be checked for this:

• https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/User:Denny/Year/es
• https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/User:Denny/Year/de
• https://hr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Haus
• https://hr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Jahr
• https://hr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Feder

Once we have more memory, we should test this out with two or three big items, and if it works fine, switch it on.

Happy to call it closed!

Note that this is about implementation https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z28032 which is currently not connected.

Once it is fixed on Wikidata, we can also fix it on Wikifunctions, I hope (T405475)

I think that this seems to just take much longer than I thought, but eventually it does show up.

Same thing happens in the following flow:

• Edit with visual editor
• Insert or change a function call with values
• Look at the Preview, shows OK
• Click on "Apply changes" and the change never is displayed in the text

I would like to keep this, but will reduce priority to low and to "No current plans".

Raised priority as it is blocking the fragments work.

I think they fail because Z6821/Fetch Wikidata Item for both Virgil and Dante does not currently return any Date of Birth statement

Ah, got it! Right, and now that you explained it, I also understood it.

Regarding the question why include the lemma: because the sense can be outside the context of a Lexeme, in which case it would be very difficult to figure out what the sense refers to.

Thank you, @BTullis !

Not sure if this is related, but the latest Lexemes dump seems is also empty:

Re Geno's question: