User Details
- User Since
- Jul 7 2020, 8:30 PM (327 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- DVrandecic
- MediaWiki User
- DVrandecic (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Tue, Oct 13
Thu, Oct 1
That sounds like a good solution. Basically, the rendered version could be just displayed in edit mode as it is in view mode (so no direct manipulation is possible). But the contributor can use the caret to open it and then edit the parts as desired. And then close it again to see the updated display rendered. But since there is no parser, the rendered version can not be edited directly and parsed back into the structured representation.
Wed, Sep 16
@DMartin-WMF -- is that now resolved?
Sep 4 2026
Sep 1 2026
Aug 28 2026
That was a copy and paste error on my side. I understood the error and fixed the implementation. Now everything works as expected.
Aug 13 2026
Wow! I didn't expect anything near to this, this is amazing! It creates all the hundreds of forms, in less than a second, without any issues!
Aug 4 2026
Here is the function call that produces the not fully evaluated object:
Jul 31 2026
Z38676 (bind value by position) is implemented by Z38679 which uses Z38598 (bind value by id) which is implemented by Z38630 which uses Z38619 (substitue s-expression) which is implemented by Z38629 which uses Z38625 (is argument reference) which is implemented by Z38628 which uses Z19352 (object has this type) which is implemented by Z31193 which uses Z22764 (string from type)
The problems seem to start even sooner: this is just binding a value to the second position of subtraction. The "arguments" key remains unevalued, i.e. it says
Jul 29 2026
In my head it was. :) My bad
Jul 28 2026
Jul 9 2026
Jul 1 2026
Jun 11 2026
May 26 2026
May 19 2026
Seems to work on Drucker now but still not on Windschutscheibe nor on https://hr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Trommel
May 14 2026
Second example here: https://hr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Windschutzscheibe
May 13 2026
May 12 2026
Apr 25 2026
Argh! Note that Z34148 passes, but Z33761 does not!
Might also be related to T423853 -- but notice that this one here seems to only appear in the test!
Apr 17 2026
That seemed to have been a caching issue. I changed the implementation (added a description) to bust the cache, and that made them work.
Apr 16 2026
So I wrote a SPARQL query to get all Bangla nouns that indeed have all the five forms. Turns out, it's only three of them: https://w.wiki/LJsC
Interestingly Z33244 works in this case:
OK, fixed that too. The JS float converter needed some more fixing as well:
On https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z20849 the test https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z21466 still fails for Python.
Well, here's the change that made all the tests on https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z21939 pass again.
Huh, Weird. I wonder why the output changed then.
That fixed the failing JS test on https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z20849
Implemented the suggestions from https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Talk:Z16684
There have been no changes to the converters in the last few months.
Apr 13 2026
Apr 7 2026
The example page that @Redmin meant was this here:
Apr 2 2026
Mar 31 2026
Yes, indeed. What is the suggestion? There is both a project and a specific wiki.
Mar 26 2026
Mar 25 2026
Mar 24 2026
Thank you for this estimate and plan! Between that and Arthur's suggestions, I think it covers the work comprehensively.
Mar 19 2026
This seems fixed.
Feb 13 2026
I think that's correct, it should just be persistent throughout
Dec 3 2025
Dec 2 2025
Component does not support that kind of flow
Nov 24 2025
This seems to work fine now. Thank you for reporting!
Actually, I am just closing it.
This seems to be fixed by now, and the issues reported are not reproducible anymore. Closing.
I think this seems resolved. Moving to triage to get it checked and closed.
Oct 30 2025
Oct 29 2025
Oct 28 2025
Oct 27 2025
Oct 18 2025
I hope I am not messing up the debugging effort, but I created a code implementation ( Z28931 ) that works much faster than the previous implementation ( Z28604 ).
Oct 17 2025
Oct 13 2025
I think here's another example of that not working:
Oct 12 2025
Oct 10 2025
Oct 7 2025
Discussed this with @DSmit-WMF , and it might be a good idea to have T404195 in mind when doing that, as there might be synergy.
Oct 6 2025
Here's an example of a community member reporting this: https://cs.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wikislovn%C3%ADk%3APod_l%C3%ADpou&dtnewcommentssince=c-Mykhal-20251005143000-Mykhal-20251005142500&dtinthread=1#c-Mykhal-20251005144400-Sannita_(WMF)-20251005135500
Here are a few more pages that can be checked for this: