Thank you!

Sounds good to me!

The Collaborative contributions project is a very interesting idea but I have a question: Will this replace outreach dashboards or show similar edit stats (such as number of created pages, added refs, etc.)?
If not, I don’t think this would solve our current issue.

Oh yeah of course, it wasn’t my intention to ask for automatic registration of organizers, but just to have the option to. Maybe I could have phrased that better. I took a look at T321823 and it’s exactly the feature I was looking for. I think it could be re-prioritized as that feature would benefit smaller events where organizers contribute with participants.

To give a bit more context, we’re running editathons on subjects that may expose our participants to harassment (feminism, trans people, etc.), so some of them choose to participate privately to our events. But we organizers would like be able to see how many edits they made, for our own anonymized statistics and reports. Right now it’s impossible and makes our task for difficult.

Hi, the issue we’ve encountered is that private participants are not counted in the associated dashboard’s edit statistics. This also makes it more difficult for organizers to see precisely what private participants did during an event.

I’m the maintainer of that gadget, I’ll see what I can do.
Cheers.

In T395460#11126667, @Perryprog wrote:

(Mildly interesting is that it looks like you can actually always get the user's gender in a message by doing something like l’utilisat{{GENDER:|eur|rice|eur·rice}}, which is neat but it seems like it's rarely used.)

I just checked again and the issue is still present. My account is set to use feminine pronouns but the dropdown menu still shows “Utilisateur·ice”, which is the gender-neutral form, instead of the expected “Utilisatrice”.
Basically, the edits I made back in May were to have a true gender-neutral form “Utilisateur·ice” along the masculine “Utilisateur” and feminine “Utilisatrice” forms.
What this tells me is that the user’s gender is not passed to these translations as the menu items always show the gender-neutral form.

No problem :) That looks correct now, thanks!

I got an email notification to review the patch but as I don’t know how to do it on gerrit, I’ll do it here.
I see that the variable %code% is used instead of the requested %wikiname%.

@Aklapper Thanks, I’ll look into that!

@Urbanecm Hi, I’m coming back to you as I have to make one more edit to this file but I don’t know how to. I looked around on gerrit but as I do not have an account, this didn’t help much…
Could you give me some pointers if you have time?
Thank you!

Oops, I totally forgot… Thank you very much!

In T235964#6033111, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

In T235964#6032762, @MMiller_WMF wrote:

@Trizek-WMF -- looking at the link, I see that the title is not translated. Could you please fill that in?

New User Welcome Survey Privacy Statement -> Déclaration de respect de la vie privée concernant le questionnaire d'accueil des nouveaux arrivants.

I let @Darmo117 check on it. :)

The translation seems right to me, should I rename the page and change the link?

@MMiller_WMF Hi, when I translated the text, I left the mentions to Wikipedia even though it is destined to Wiktionary because I was told so. Is it an issue or do we have to change it?

J'ai traduit la déclaration de confidentialité (https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Darmo117/New_User_Welcome_Survey_Privacy_Statement), si vous voulez y jeter un oeil.