Thanks very much for your comment @Nikerabbit

Can you try https://tools.wmflabs.org/isa/campaigns/2 instead ?

@AdityaJ IMO your proposal looks good. Clearly written. Please have you read through the comments under the proposed project just so you didn’t miss anything?

@Ayushshri121 I think your proposal has a detailed analysis of the proposed tool. The diagrams are self-explanatory. Maybe you could clearly state out the deliverables in a section...

I should ideally respond to your comments on this task or check my user page for more contact info.

Feel free to add the names of the mentors.

@Zanna234 can you clearly outline the deliverables of this project in this proposal so that it’s clear what You intend to accomplish at the end of the project.

@Gabrielchl My suggestion would be to think out a descriptive name which could be used for the tool and explain why you think this name could be used. Also, it would be nice to explain more the features which you think would be nice to have.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts @Gabrielchl. I suggest you present your thoughts on your proposal precisely stating why you choose to think it would be better to make use of your idea, the advantages and disadvantages. You could say: using recent edits are better because it provides us access to recently edited images...which may also have a disadvantage that older edits may not appear because...unless we specify the number of previous edits we will like to work on.

We are working here with images from commons categories.

@Mh-3110 Thanks very much for your interest to work on this project. Please do well to look at the previous comment made by @NavinoEvans and others which could go a long way to enlighten you on how to move forward.

@Sanyam.wikime you can always submit a patch as the task is open for discussions.

@srishakatux I will around for some tasks and add if I can find them. I would go for other smaller issues all the same.