Communities in Latin America have expressed interest in having access to the Spanish-language edition.

Thanks for considering this as a follow-on task, @KCVelaga_WMF.

In addition to understanding whether the number of references (at least 4) has an impact on deletion, could we look at whether the language of the reference has an impact?

I'm excited by the opportunity to surface community-organized events on the Newcomer Homepage. I think the main benefit of the collaboration list module would be to let newcomers know that they can meet other people, and develop as an editor, by joining an event. With that in mind, I tend to agree that it might be enough to show the community update and one very relevant event (if available), with a link to the full list. Repeating what others have said here, I would select an upcoming online event from the current language wiki that matches one of the newcomer's topic interests.

Thank you

Yes, thank you so much @Ragesoss

I wonder if this issue should also be reported here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Programs_%26_Events_Dashboard&action=edit&section=new

The flyer was distributed at WikiCon North America (3-6 Oct) and the Wikimedia Technology Summit in India (4-5 Oct). There was also a presentation at WTS.

Our flyer was distributed at the Wikimedia CEE Meeting (20-22 Sep) and Celtic Knot (25-27 Sep).

This is now live on the Flickr Foundation's blog: https://www.flickr.org/working-with-snapshots-of-structured-data-on-wikimedia-commons/

Just to clarify, you're asking if we can develop a plan and documentation for maintaining the allow-list, based on the GitLab process we discussed:

• Gitlab provides an interface that will send Data Products a merge request
• Data Products approves, then it runs on the next pipeline (monthly)
• Requester receives an email notification that the merge request was accepted

These are instructions for Wikimedia Foundation staff.

This is clear and is a workable solution.

Thank you so much!

Adding a couple of people for awareness.

At Wikimania this week, Mariana Fossati and Sunshine Fionah Komusana of Whose Knowledge? talked about some of the challenges of using structured data to describe the images of women contributed through #VisibleWikiWomen (consent, privacy, biases in automated description): https://www.youtube.com/live/nSsVDaCJyZ8?feature=share&t=800

Wikimedia Israel successfully migrated the Dashboard from AWS to Wikimedia cloud: https://glamwikidashboard.wmcloud.org/

Yes

Following up on @EChetty's last post, @Udehb-WMF created a page to document GLAM Metrics: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Product_and_technical_support_for_Commons_2022-23/GLAM_Metrics_Needs

The Google Group was set up (thanks) and we just refreshed the membership and management.

The CEE coordinator for the January 1Lib1Ref campaign reported that the date range for a hashtag search is lost when you click ‘show statistics’. This means that the graphs include all past campaign data rather than the specified date range. They think it is important for the 1Lib1Ref organisers in each country to see live data and graphs for their campaigns.

I'm happy with the icon that you selected and the copy is placed where I would expect it to be.

Giovanna has been doing this.

Thank you @Miriam and @tizianopiccardi for this data.

I would be happy for now to just have the information for English Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your help so far.

We're thinking of organizing a workshop on this topic, with accessibility consultants, people with lived experience, the WikiBlind user group, and anyone else who is interested. Does that seem like a useful way to explore these questions?