In T358095#9685006, @CMyrick-WMF wrote:

In T358095#9683453, @MahimaSinghal wrote:

Hello @Pablo, @CMyrick-WMF, @Isaac,

Given that we can still edit the submitted notebook, would it be advisable to make further edits directly to it? Alternatively, if we intend to incorporate additional content beyond the original submission, should we create a new notebook for these purposes? Your guidance on the preferred approach would be appreciated.

Thank you.

Yes, all applicants who submit a final application will be able to continue recording and editing their microtask notebook through May 1, 2024 at 4pm UTC. However, please know that these edits might occur after we have finished assessing the notebooks. (After April 5th, mentors will have likely completed most of their reviews).

In T358095#9683453, @MahimaSinghal wrote:

Hello @Pablo, @CMyrick-WMF, @Isaac,

Given that we can still edit the submitted notebook, would it be advisable to make further edits directly to it? Alternatively, if we intend to incorporate additional content beyond the original submission, should we create a new notebook for these purposes? Your guidance on the preferred approach would be appreciated.

Thank you.

In T358095#9677273, @Bilal171 wrote:

when I make an graph between days of specific month. all boxplots are same? I checked manually that all days have same median . so it is right or not? or is Am I doing something wrong here.

In T358095#9653619, @Gungun_Singh wrote:

hey, we just needed to mail the PAWS public link right or is there anything else that should be done?

In T358095#9628241, @CMyrick-WMF wrote:

Message from the project mentors about the final application

Some comments on the final application, especially with respect to the project timeline question:

• The most important aspect of the application is the notebook from the application task. We wont be able to give feedback on the other aspects of the final application.
• Regarding the project timeline question:
  • Try to give a rough sketch of the different steps you plan to take in order to complete the project. T356498 mentions 4 phases: becoming familiar with the dataset, selection of specific Wikiprojects of interest, analysis and visualization, and building an interactive web interface.
  • The aim is to organize what things you think should be done and in which order. This is flexible and will likely change as you embark on the project.
  • Feel free to identify which aspects are most interesting to you and would like to spend more time on; as well as any additional steps you might think are pertinent for your work on this project.

In T358095#9622573, @MahimaSinghal wrote:

In T358095#9622553, @GonzaGertrude wrote:

In T358095#9622547, @Funmi_Makinde wrote:

Hello everyone. Please can anyone explain the idea or logic of having a revision for an article on the same day within short time intervals?
Could it be that it was reviewed then updated and reviewed again?

Could be. or different editors reviewed it.

Even if the revision for an article was on the same day within short time intervals , it might have significant changes in the feature values like num_ref or num_wikilinks and other features as well.

In T358095#9622553, @GonzaGertrude wrote:

In T358095#9622547, @Funmi_Makinde wrote:

Hello everyone. Please can anyone explain the idea or logic of having a revision for an article on the same day within short time intervals?
Could it be that it was reviewed then updated and reviewed again?

Could be. or different editors reviewed it.

Hello everyone, I'm Funmi Makinde an outreachy applicant. I'm new to open source; interested in learning and contributing to this project