In T314005#8111540, @Aklapper wrote:

It does not matter. Please always use the form. It makes it way easier to allow people to understand what's wanted, why something is wanted, where to see something, what's expected, what actually happens, etc etc.

In T314005#8111258, @Aklapper wrote:

@Ilovemydoodle2: Please always use the bug report form (linked from the top of the task creation page) to create a bug report, and fill in the sections in the template, separately: Steps to reproduce, what you expect to happen, and what happens instead.

There is consensus. Four actual users support. There are only two that oppose:

1. One of them has never edited here and there vote was removed.
2. Is very new here and only joined a few days ago.

While the rest have been here for much longer.

In T313189#8083139, @TheresNoTime wrote:

Waiting for consensus to form at https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Village_pump#Add_template_editor_right 🙂

@Aklapper Is there any way for a user to choose the name of the right they want to be called? (e.g. some might want to go by "template administrator", while other may want to go by "template editor")

Neutral While I see the potential benefits of this, I am also concerned that if a bot was compromised, this could be abused.

In T313189#8083022, @Aklapper wrote:

In the future, please always follow https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requesting_wiki_configuration_changes when requesting site configuration changes for a Wikimedia website. Thanks. Please do not set Due Dates for no reason if you don't plan to write a patch yourself. Thanks.

In T313189#8083005, @Zabe wrote:

Please provide a community consensus for this change.

In T313005#8077013, @Aklapper wrote:

Hi, please provide use cases by describing use cases in the section called "use case". I saw above and I did not spot a use case. Thanks. Same for Benefits. The form above exists for a reason.

In T312835#8072432, @Aklapper wrote:

No because I don't want and don't care about this feature

In T312835#8072415, @Aklapper wrote:

Additional code complexity and maintenance costs for years to come for very unclear gain. Please see also Peachey88's comment.

In T312835#8071819, @Aklapper wrote:

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Development_prioritization

In T302642#8015220, @matmarex wrote:

Everyone already calls it Meta-Wiki. Its main page says "Meta-Wiki" in big bold text, and it has since 2004. When you receive a notification on it, it says it's from "Meta-Wiki".

You should definitely hold this discussion on the Meta-Wiki though, instead of in our little cabal here, where most people never even visit the wiki ;)

This is one of the worst proposals I have seen here, almost as bad as Vector 2022.

@Aklapper Could you please provide a reason for declining?

In T312835#8071601, @Aklapper wrote:

That's already possible. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Blocking_users . Feel free to bring up questions in a support forum. Thanks.

In T38976#8067539, @Aklapper wrote:

Priority reflects reality...

Hi, I am going to raise this task's priority to 'medium' since this appears to be a regularly reported issue.

please

In T312592#8064421, @Aklapper wrote:

@Ilovemydoodle2 It would be great if all my other points in my previous comment were not ignored but answered. Thanks.

In T312592#8063648, @Aklapper wrote:

Please private basic pointers and sufficient information what a feature request or a bug report is about. If you see something somewhere, please provide at least a link or a screenshot. Thanks. Has this been discussed on English Wikiquote if this is wanted?

In T312545#8062308, @Aklapper wrote:

You could implement it in your custom local MediaWiki installation, however for UX reasons (more buttons to clutter the interface) and performance reasons we don't plan to in upstream. (PS: It's possible to comment on tasks without reopening them. Thanks.)

In T312545#8061893, @Aklapper wrote:

This is already possible by editing the limit value in the URL. There are no plans to add more values to the user interface.

In T312062#8050464, @Legoktm wrote:

The English Wikipedia has set up pages like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Special:AncientPages. While I think we don't want to introduce a Special_talk namespace, I think it would be interesting for *some* special pages to have a discussion/talk tab that led to a project-space page.

In T311886#8046932, @Aklapper wrote:

You are probably one (1) person

In T311885#8046605, @Aklapper wrote:

I guess you could try

In T311886#8046609, @Aklapper wrote:

Uncommon situation

In T311886#8045883, @Aklapper wrote:

That does not sound like a useful approach to technically support

In T311885#8045884, @Aklapper wrote:

It's up to the web browser to render <input type="radio" disabled="disabled"> correctly on any zoom level. This is standard HTML.

In T311885#8045718, @Aklapper wrote:

@Ilovemydoodle2: Please always fill out ALL information in task descriptions. Cannot reproduce in Vector skin using Firefox 102.0.

In T311886#8045712, @Aklapper wrote:

This task lacks a use case - please always explain why exactly and specifically you want someone to spend time implementing and maintaining additional code complexity. Closing as duplicate.

In T311886#8045429, @TheresNoTime wrote:

Same task as T310411: Allow exceptions to the Echo limit which you filed a few weeks ago — pretty sure @Legoktm's comment still applies to be honest...

In T311797#8042925, @Dylsss wrote:

https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UrlGetParameters already adds a parser function to get a url parameter.

In T310950#8015352, @Aklapper wrote:

Please allow at least a week.

In T302642#8015220, @matmarex wrote:

Everyone already calls it Meta-Wiki. Its main page says "Meta-Wiki" in big bold text, and it has since 2004. When you receive a notification on it, it says it's from "Meta-Wiki".

You should definitely hold this discussion on the Meta-Wiki though, instead of in our little cabal here, where most people never even visit the wiki ;)

In T310950#8016297, @Stang wrote:

To make it clear: new group "rollbacker" should only contains rollback permission?

In T310950#8015352, @Aklapper wrote:

Please allow at least a week.

I disagree, I think it should remain as simply "Meta".

In T310950#8013347, @Peachey88 wrote:

Please add a link to community census from the local community where this has been discussed and agreed to implement.

In T310641#8008032, @Aklapper wrote:

By a local cookie I mean a cookie that isn’t assigned to the IP, rather assigned to the web browser.

That's not how cookies work. Please do not reopen this task - thanks.

Could you please elaborate?

In T310641#8007447, @Aklapper wrote:

I don't mean a tracking cookie, I mean a local cookie that disables the prompt.

@Ilovemydoodle2: What is the technical difference between a "local cookie" and a "tracking cookie"? All and any of your cookies are local? Without reading your cookie, how would a non-local website be supposed to know that you had a cookie to define that the non-local website should not display something?

In T310636#8005355, @Aklapper wrote:

Hi, do you have a specific example when this is needed (URL welcome)? Do you know if other people are also interested in this?