In T177596#4924100, @Nikerabbit wrote:

We have updated our statement of intent and maintenance levels. Main change was about reducing our scope which included degrading support for Babel. We also agreed to try out some internal process changes with regards to reviews.

I understand that this might not be what you expected from this update. Since this discussion is not directly related to this task, please post possible comments or questions about this update on the talk page or other relevant channels rather than on this task.

In T177596#4898069, @Nikerabbit wrote:

Not yet. January hasn't ended yet :)

I know this thing, I thought to allow renaming by default :) but I still have to think about it, the idea does not seem to me to be so sensible now.

Oh, my fail, I didnt know that this thing can renaming topics. Hm, can we allow renaming other people's topics then?

Thanks a lot :)

Oh, thanks a lot :)

@Volker_E can you check it please?

@Aklapper we need you :) Is it necessary to create gerrit repo or git repo is enough?

OK, thanks :) We are waiting for you :)

In T177596#4825409, @Nikerabbit wrote:

An update of the statement is planned for January 2019.

In T214291#4896351, @Aklapper wrote:

I admit I am reluctant to create projects in Phab for smaller on-wiki code projects as long as https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T121470 is not resolved. Communication to users where to report issues is pretty hard for on-wiki code. I'm very happy to do this though if there is a code repository in Git/Gerrit. :)

Oh, ok, I will talk to the main author about this :) However, in a short time, I think it will cease to be a local gadget.

@Aklapper hello:)

In T214199#4895352, @Sophivorus wrote:

@Iniquity, I will probably request a quick grant for this bot and the many other ProveIt requests that accumulated. Again, it may take some weeks, but we'll get there.

It is not so important. I think we can wait a bit:)

I think it was fixed :)

@Johan @Aklapper Thanks :)

@Johan, hello!:) Can you write anything about this update in the Tech News?

In T21322#4875190, @Bawolff wrote:

more that nobody is currently working on it

It is sad, these logs are really unreadable.

If it is difficult to change the scheme, then I think it is quite possible to create a DB (something like MediaWiki:Admin-bots) with users which we can to hide.

@Xaosflux Hmm, maybe we need to update the description of this task or update the name? It's not very clear what it is talking about.

Do I understand correctly that the task is resolved?

Wow, this is old problem. Any news?

@Tulsi_Bhagat Thanks!

@Volker_E hm, so, Is it necessary to move this image too?

Thanks!

@Mhurd @JMinor Hello, do you have any idea how to fix it?

@Volker_E Thanks! But I regret to inform you that...

In T210171#4772610, @Zoranzoki21 wrote:

In T210171#4772608, @Iniquity wrote:

In T210171#4772607, @Zoranzoki21 wrote:

Hi @Iniquity. Before deployment of this change, namespace have to be empty.

Hi:) This namespace is empty: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Служебная:Все_страницы?from=&to=&namespace=108

Yes, I saw it after my previous comment. So,I scheduled this for SWAT deployment tomorrow between 12:00–13:00 UTC.

In T210171#4772607, @Zoranzoki21 wrote:

Hi @Iniquity. Before deployment of this change, namespace have to be empty.

The bot creates categories, as someone tries to put a template in the preview.

Not resolved.

In T194452#4726700, @JMinor wrote:

This is definitely being delivered to the store now. Trying again...

@Amire80, @Nikerabbit can you help us to megre this patch? We really need it.

In T177596#4610367, @Kaganer wrote:

In T177596#4603410, @Iniquity wrote:

Patch updated. jenkins-bot is agree with patch.

Great news!

May anyone update the Tech News or create a little announce, please?

Patch updated. jenkins-bot is agree with patch.

In T194452#4536388, @JMinor wrote:

Perhaps it hasn't been translated for your language?

https://github.com/wikimedia/wikipedia-ios/blob/f396703a3ecee1387cfdbb09847991f8143c084f/fastlane/metadata/ru/name.txt?

Help, please, anybody. We are really need this patch.

Can’t verify this :( Don’t you need to change something in your AppStore account?

In T200527#4457176, @Volker_E wrote:

Hi @Iniquity, what would be your expected result? No information about HSB at all?

I apologize for the answer with delay, no, on the contrary I think that it should be shown always.

Sorry. I did not see how the subtask was created :(

In T199827#4431939, @Aklapper wrote:

In T199827#4431920, @Iniquity wrote:

Gadgets, common.js, common.css, TemplateStyles pages, Lua modules, personal scripts are included? Just there is nothing about it on this page. I kept thinking that this applies to the internal code only.

I go to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions and the very first list links to guidelines for CSS, JavaScript, Lua etc.
I don't understand why "there is nothing about it" on that page.

In T199827#4431884, @Legoktm wrote:

In T199827#4431877, @Iniquity wrote:

@Legoktm the existing coding conventions documentation is created for MediaWiki, not Wikimedia. Am I mistaken?

They are the same. All Wikimedia code should follow the MediaWiki coding conventions, which in other places are referred to as the Wikimedia coding conventions.

@Legoktm the existing coding conventions documentation is created for MediaWiki, not Wikimedia. Am I mistaken?

@Amire80 Hello, can you review this patch, please?

@Jdlrobson I have changed something because of !important ban, can you look it again?

@Jdlrobson can you review this patch please? :)

In T177596#4309187, @Amire80 wrote:

In T177596#4280124, @Iniquity wrote:

I have problems with knowledge of the language.

Do you mean PHP?