Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Regrouped with objective owner on consensus check and advancing to next steps and a new hypothesis for implementation planning for higher-level strategy sign-off.
• [MI 2.2b] Prepped final artifacts for the implementation planning and decision brief drafting for the evaluation plan and next hypothesis.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)
[MI 2.2b] Regrouped for sync session with working group for reviewing the pennultimate model in it's simplified version along with key metric outcome chains for development and research prioritization. Six of the working group members have input to the output consensus check exercise for decision-making to advance into a new hypothesis for implementation planning including harmonization and configuration-setting for higher-level strategy sign-off.
[MI 2.3] Connected with objective owner and identified ongoing need for additional coordination with diverging documentation spaces in the metric development process for contributor-focused metrics.
[MI 2.4] Connected with objective owner and identified need to move forward with prioritizing additional experience active editors' cut-points for and revisit nomenclature to adjust labels to something more congruent with community expectations around what is experienced.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Attended WE3 + FA offsite, integrated, and communicated about the latest model additions from the donor metrics breakout session last week.
• [MI 2.1b] Synced with objective owner on assumptions, metric chains to potential core metrics, and next steps
• [MI 2.2b] Prepped for group sync meeting to check in on consensus about the current models and core metric alignments.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2a] Initiated close-out reporting.
• [MI 2.1b] Synced with key folks on open questions for advancing on synthesis. Now advancing on assumptions extraction with a slight gap around system actions and measures.
• [MI 2.2b] Split out three of the four mapped measurement areas to clarify connections to potential core metrics and to simplify the models.
• [MI 2.3] Attended steering commitee meeting.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Reviewed input gaps in the theories of change for synthesis.
• [MI 2.2a] Integrated the latest model feedback to the project documentation.
• [MI 2.2b] Reconnected with hypothesis owner for final measurement area - expecting to be on track with the rest of the group early next week.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Following up on open questions and input gaps in the theories of change for synthesis.
• [MI 2.2a] Offsite - Synthesized a new detailed and high-level model pathing segmentation to the proposed health and core metrics.
• [MI 2.3] Collected collaborator input to draft tracker shared for practice in status sharing for metrics in varied stages of research and development

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Following up on open questions and input gaps in the theories of change - begining to synthesize.
• [MI 2.3] Added additional information columns and details to draft tracker shared for practice in status sharing for metrics in varied stages of research and development
• [MI 2.3] Connected on lower level indicators for integrating to the dashboard insights.
• [MI 2.2b] Advanced a second iteration of the revised detailed model on the miro board and begin working at a simplified model.
• [MI 2.2a] Prepped for offsite engagement strategy.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2a] Mapped engagement strategy for offsite and potential follow-up interaction session. Still partially blocked, we have 3/6 inputs recorded, and are moving forward with the additional inputs shared there and via monthly check-in.
• [MI 2.1b] Connected with objective owner on open comments from sync and new connections and metric additions.
• [MI 2.2b] Prepped miro board with take 2 on the straw dog measurement model integrating session feedback and follow-up clarifications for additions for sharing with WE 3 working group
• [MI 2.3] Identified shared tracking and status practice for metrics needing development

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2a] No additional progress. We have 2/6 inputs recorded.
• [MI 2.2b] Prepped miro board and straw dog measurement model for sync with full WE 3 working group
• [MI 2.1b] Facilitated group session for measurement model mapping and now carrying out async follow-up steps to revise the model and begin to vet the identified metrics.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2a] Connected with WE 5 Objective owner on next steps for unblocking review and input. We now have 2/5 inputs recorded.
• [MI 2.1b] Followed-along WE 3 measurement strategy collaborator inputs for synthesis.
• [MI 2.2b] Began to prep miro board for sync with full WE 3 working group Nov 18th.
• [MI 2.3] Circled back to manager with input on WE1 metrics advancement and additional research prioritization input

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Followed-up on progress at consumers' measurement strategy prework.
• [MI 2.2a] Followed-up again with next steps for input to the penultimate model and suggested measurement concepts.
• [MI 2.3] Added links and story points to presentation deck scheduled working session for collaboration.
• [MI 2.3] Synced with WE1 objective owner on research prioritization and status and next steps for advancing new metrics.
• [MI 2.3] Synced with cross-sectional team and objective owner on quicksurveys improvements and nexts steps for potential implementation.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Synced in kickoff session for the consumers' measurement strategy prework.
• [MI 2.2a] Followed-up to fill gaps in the evaluation plan on definitions and readiness estimates.
• [MI 2.2a] Synced with working group to confirm measurement model and identify any remaining research gaps.
• [MI 2.2a] Followed-up with next steps for input to the pennultimate model and suggested measurement concepts.
• [MI 2.3] Reconnected with KR pillar lead and WE 1 objective owner to clarify connections to key north star / topline indicator. Adjusted the model to add one mid-term indicator for impact awareness and a direct arrow from collaborations to editors related to the flow of not just collaboration leaders but also contributors to retained editors. Corresponding to this clarification we adjusted documentation to include count of collaborations at the start of the funnel to collaboration leaders and participants, as it is the area's key indicator despite only flowing to the retained editors metric through the count of contributors who participate.
• [MI 2.3] Finished diagram and fleshed out basic story points and collaborators to a draft deck for presenting the journey of the Contributors' measurement strategy development. Shared to manager.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Continued documentation review.
• [MI 2.2a] Connected with Objective owner on the latest measurement models and on remaining gaps in the evaluation plan spreadsheet
• [MI 2.3] Shared story points and contributors for the journey of the Contributors' measurement strategy development and presentation plan. Began to map diagram.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Continued documentation review, reset first sync meetings
• [MI 2.2a] Identified and began filling gaps in the evaluation plan spreadsheet
• [MI 2.2a] Connected on Enterprise strategic alignments.
• [MI 2.3] Outlined story points and contributors for the journey of the Contributors' measurement strategy development.

Assigning for triage

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Continued documentation review, Sent reminders to KR owners about pre-work, Scheduled first sync meeting
• [MI 2.2a] Set another an alternative final sync session with better attendance potential
• [MI 2.2a] Finished pushing metrics and notes to the evaluation plan spreadsheet
• [MI 2.2a] Connected on Enterprise strategic alignments.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Set-up hypothesis in asana for WE 3 measurement strategy for Q2 and communicated out to WE 3 measurement strategy collaborators for Q2 kickoff.
• [MI 2.2a] Continued to develop measurement models based on the conversations and follow-up inputs.
• [MI 2.2a] Set time to connect on Enterprise and WE5.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Connected with WE 3 Objective owner to coordinate kicking off consumer measurement strategy work in October.
• [MI 2.2a] Working to develop alternative measurement models and to clarify topline metrics based on the conversations and inputs.
• [MI 2.2a] Followed-up with WE 5 Objective owner on initial remapping of the straw dog measurement model

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1a] Began synthesis of the identified theories of change to reduce excess words
• [MI 2.1b] Reached out to connect with Objective owner for the Consumers' strategy and scheduled initial sync to kick-off theory of change and measurement mapping in October.
• [MI 2.2a] Working group met synchronously to discuss and confirm the logic and measurement model(s) and to identify key core and indicators metrics and potential research gaps related to the needed measures. We have identified two potential core metrics for the objective at this time, (Re)Directed Users and Traffic Quality (i.e., Confidence in knowing who are our users and user agents are).
• [MI 2.2a] Reached to to get async input from collaborators unable to participate in sync session.
• [MI 2.3] Added links to data query to metric documentation page on meta, followed-up on research queue prioritization in terms of Contributors' strategy insights needs.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Synced back with objective owner to share progress and align on next steps.
• [MI 2.1] Reaching out async to follow-up on questions on shared theories of change and indicator readiness for use.
• [MI 2.2] Shared initial modelling of the metric trees reported.
• [MI 2.2] Working to integrate 5.4 measures and model the indicators identified and identify potential intersections and divergences.
• [MI 2.3] Input to kickoff of reporting and operationalization planning for product reporting
• [MI 2.3] Continued connecting with Engineering in navigation of next steps for QuickSurveys development needs.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Working to integrate and model the metric trees identified and reaching out async to follow-up on questions on shared theories of change and indicators for mapping.
• [MI 2.3] Continued connecting with Engineering in navigation of next steps for QuickSurveys development needs.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Working to integrate and model the metric trees identified and reaching out async to follow-up on questions on shared theories of change and indicators for mapping.
• [MI 2.3] Continued connecting with Engineering in navigation of next steps for QuickSurveys development needs.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Working group is focused on async expectations for completing the logic model and metric mapping for the 4 KR areas:
• [MI 2.1] Followed up about async assignment - we are now at 75% completion
• [MI 2.3] Communicated to key channels about latest metrics being deployed in our monthly reporting.
• [MI 2.3] Amplified onboarding session and materials to key slack channels for broader sharing.
• [MI 2.3] Scheduled follow-up for key RDS folks to meet and discussion potential approaches and timeline to the prioritized FY25/26 queue for contributors' strategy relevant research.
• [MI 2.3] Continued connecting with Engineering in navigation of next steps for QuickSurveys development needs.
• [MI 2.4] Additions to the development backlog for gaps in essential metric criteria for new metrics released.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Regrouped on process and reset async expectations for completing the logic model and metric mapping for the 4 KR areas.
• [MI 2.3] Presented slide deck for onboarding more broadly to our aligned approach for the measurement of the Contributors' strategy.
• [MI 2.3] Prepped comms and documentation for upcoming release of three new movement health metrics including the new core annual plan metric for the Contributors' strategy.
• [MI 2.3] Connected with Engineering and Research leads to develop next steps for addressing survey infrastructure gaps of quicksurveys.
• [MI 2.4] Completed essential metric criteria documentation for remaining new retention metrics being released.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)
[MI 2.1] Completed first working group sync
[MI 2.3] Completed slide deck narration for onboarding session & connected on topline indicators as remaining steps for sign-off. Identified additional core metric for development in Phase III, Retained Moderators, after the completion of Monthly Active Moderators.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)
[MI 2.1] Completed project mapping, connected with objective owner, scheduled working group syncs for August
[MI 2.3] Connected with decision-makers on remaining steps for sign-off.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Completed documentation review and initiated project mapping
• [MI 2.3] Scheduled synchronous meeting of key engineering and product managers for advancing our needed survey infrastructure alongside instrumentation efforts.
• [MI 2.4] Initiated review for "Experienced active editors

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1] Initiated documentation review and project mapping (WE 5.4.4)
• [MI 2.3] Scheduled synchronous meeting for key operators of, and adjacent to, the Contributors' strategy, for onboarding to the measurement strategy from it’s underlying theory of change to the metric gaps and development priorities for enabling timely research and evaluation throughout the course of the strategy.
• [MI 2.4] Initiated esssential metric review queue for Phase II metrics
• [MI 2.5] Stalled.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Posted hypothesis closeout report for WE 1.5.4 as supported pending final review and sign-offs next week.
• [MI 2.2b] Scheduled synchronous meeting for final review and sign-off of the Editor Retention metric configuration.
• [MI 2.2b] Concluded about dependencies, estimated burden/lift and responsibilities for documentation and timeline prioritization for continued development phases of the contributors' metric area.
• [MI 2.2b] Followed-up on theory of change and measurement model design iteration.
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed final comparison data for retained newcomers to conclude regarding sensitivity and utility of different follow-up windows and make recommendations for next steps in development. Began updating and testing code with current data to set code for review and deployment next month.

Basics were run to discover data issue - remaining slide revisions for content gaps metrics and reader metrics. Contributor metrics are ready to go.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Editor Retention recommendation drafted
• [MI 2.2b] Set next steps for onboarding additional key dependencies and meeting targets for developing timeline for improved survey sampling.
• [MI 2.3b] We are down to just the follow-up window recommendation for Newcomer Retention which will either be 1st or 2nd fortnight - it will be based on repeated action of a single edit, and count edits to any namespace, unlike active editors. This will be mapped specifically to constructively activated newcomers in their first weeks of activation rather than a splice of the second-month returning new editors.
• [MI 2.5] Stalled this week

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Continued investigation into Editor Retention configurations.
• [MI 2.2b] Engaged with messaging among key dependencies to clarify estimated burden and opportunities for developing improved survey sampling and indicators needing further experimentation and final decisions on selection.
• [MI 2.3b] Finalized recommendation and approach for the active experienced editors metric.
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed comparison data for retained newcomers examining the sensitivity and utility of session-based vs edit indicators due to the unknown data gaps in the edit attempts tables we are leaning most to the single edit configuration with either a first or second fortnight follow-up window.
• [MI 2.5] Received additional documentation for review from technical documentation team for review and potential alignment.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Continued investigation into Editor Retention configurations.
• [MI 2.2b] Scheduled messaging to key dependencies identified to clarify estimated burden and opportunities for collaboration.
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed comparison data for retained newcomers examining the sensitivity and utility of session-based vs edit indicators.
• [MI 2.5] Reached out to technical documentation specialist

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Continued investigation into Editor Retention configurations.
• [MI 2.2b] Began connecting with key collaborators to clarify estimated burden/lift and responsibilities
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed comparison data for retained newcomers examining the sensitivity and utility of different session-based indicators.
• [MI 2.5] Updated most current metrics page with the Q3 metrics added. Continued review of documentation spaces shared for next steps.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Shared workplan
• [MI 2.2b] Met with designer for support to documentation of theory of change and measurement model for broader sharing
• [MI 2.2b] Connected on Editor Retention Measure - Feasibility Investigation - Decided to use a count version of the metric and not the retention rate which can be calculated separately and used in early experimentation use cases. Identified three straw dog metrics for potential experimentation
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with working group on latest data pulls to explore sessions approaches to the Retained Newcomers metric. Decided to recommend advancing an initial Experienced Active Editors metric using thresholds at 100 and 300 edits within the last year to indicate progression from "Junior" 1-99 edits, to "Experienced" 100-299, and "Very Experienced". The working group recommends further monitoring and investigation into a potential upper threshold around the 85-90th percentile for "Very Very Experienced" editors.
• [MI 2.5] Addition of new core metrics to documentation space.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.2b] Outlined May-June wokplan and identified initial collaborators
• [MI 2.2b] Connected on Editor Retention Measure - Feasibility Investigation - For discussion to input to the selection of the retention metric type (i.e., repeated action vs group membership)
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with working group on fifth data pulls to confirm alignment with monthly distribution thresholds for experienced active editors and explore sessions approaches to the retained newcomers metric.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Confirmed working group sign-off of executive summary recommendations.
• [MI 2.1b] Drafted WE 1.5.2 Hypothesis close-out report.
• [MI 2.1b] Drafted new hypothesis for Q4 implementation efforts.
• [MI 2.1b] Routed overview for support in reducing lexical complexity before broader sharing.
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with working group on third data pull to review distributions of editor time and frequency of crossing the various edit thresholds in the past 1 year.
• [MI 2.3b] Identified next steps for advancing on the active experienced editor metric and exploring sessions approaches to the retained newcomers metric.
• [MI 2.5] Re-engaged with the initial discovery and documentation spaces shared.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Held last synchronous working group session to confirm the latest model and finalize recommendations around specific measurement approaches and/or research and development gaps.
• [MI 2.1b] Followed-up async to resolve remaining measurement choices and wrked to draft the executive summary of the working groups final recommendations for the overall measurement model and specified measurement approaches for each stage of the theory of change.
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with working group on second data pull to review distributions of editor time and frequency of crossing the 100 edit threshold. Identified next steps for advancing on the active experienced editor metric.

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Continued asynchronous to update with working group members on latest model adjustments and new metric identified.
• [MI 2.1b] Prepared for upcoming synchronous meeting for final decision-making snd sign-off on the recommendation.
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with working group on initial data pulled and editors distributions around potential experienced active editors thresholds

Progress update for the past 2 weeks (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Regrouped with agree and decide stakeholders as well as Product Managers of the contributors strategy.
• [MI 2.1b] Identified a need to revise the model further, separating out retained editors who are not moderating, mentoring, or collaborating.
• [MI 2.1b] Identified a potential single metric and model revisions to align this metric across the onboard, habit, and enablement measurement pathways identified.
• [MI 2.1b] Together these integrations led to the development of Option D, now outlined in the miro and strategy brief.
• [MI 2.1b] Placed a calendar hold for the final working group meeting on Apr 15
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with the working group and set next steps for extracting data for experienced active editors and exploring session capture options for exploration of the retained newcomer approaches.

Progress update for the past 2 weeks (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Continued to document and review the known elements of the strategy recommendation process and outputs into the strategy brief for working group review and input as we work to share our draft recommendation with relevant Product Managers.
• [MI 2.3b] Regrouped with the working group on challenges and inventory examples to review for upcoming synchronous discussion.

Progress update for the past 2 weeks (MI-2)

• [MI 2.1b] Led the working group's asynchronous next steps to integrate vetting information about the model indicators and mapping the metric tree components and their specifications in an evaluation plan ensuring the logic of each metric tree identified. Here we are working to identify specific needs for data collection and reporting as well as challenges and potential solutions in terms of alternative measurement models.
• [MI 2.1b] Led the working group's asynchronous next steps to continue the vetting and decision-making between alternative indicators and methodologies to outline a revised measurement model.
• [MI 2.1b] Completed the mapping of measurement method options for each of the 32 potential key indicators identified for measuring change along three key thematic change theories: onboarding, habit-forming, and enablement. (see Evaluation plan sheet)
• [MI 2.1b] Worked to document the known elements of the strategy recommendation process and outputs into the strategy brief for working group review and input as we work toward our penultimate recommendation to share with relevant Product Managers.

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Led the WE1.5.2 working group's synchronous next steps to integrate vetting information about the model indicators elevated for consideration so we can begin mapping the metric tree components and their specifications in an evaluation plan. We will continue asynchronously in this effort as we work to ensure the logic of each metric tree identified in the model and identify the specific needs for data collection and reporting to identify challenges and potential solutions in terms of alternative measurement models.
• [MI 2.3b] Completed integrating threshold information into the inventory this week along with notes on challenges and shared back with collaborators.
• [MI 2.4b] Added local vs global sysops partition request to the backlog for core metrics
• [MI 2.5] Still on pause / Stalled this week

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Led the working group's asynchronous next steps to map potential measurement strategy options for more careful vetting. Following activities to tally and synthesize the thematic connections across logic model pathways and potential outcome indicators, we are interrogating and circulating with the broader group pf product managers, a straw dog; a synthesis of the strategy and measurement concepts into a high-level metric tree focused on changes we might expect to see within the first 1-3 years of the strategy's successful implementation.
• [MI 2.1b] Synced 1:1 with working group members to walk each through the updates to the board and process to arrive at the initial straw dog and review and input next steps.
• [MI 2.1b] Presented the working group's process, progress, and straw dog metric tree with Product Managers at their bi-weekly Contributor's Strategy meeting.
• [MI 2.3b] Minor progress in document review this week.
• [MI 2.5] Stalled this week

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Led the working group's asynchronous next steps to map potential indicators for identifying measurement strategy options for more careful vetting.
  • We have been charting, transferring, and striving to simplify the synthesis of the shared and distinct elements identified for potential measurement across the impact aims. Currently, a new spreadsheet page titled “Impact Indicator Mapping”) is available via our miro board. In the same workbook, there are also some pivot tables (“Indicators Pivots”) that help you to see the roughly 62 potential indicators we have identified and their connections to different impact aims and strategic threads.
• [MI 2.1b] Began drafting the assumptions section of the strategy brief.
• [MI 2.3b] Integrated feedback and added to the reading list for discovery.
• [MI 2.5] Stalled this week

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Facilitated the working group's second session to map potential indicators for a measurement strategy aligned with the action logic model developed last week.
  • Outlined outcome indicators along change routes to measure ten potential key impact aims in terms of our online:
    • contributors:
      • Increased online contributor retention
      • Diversified humans contributing
      • Increased active editors
    • contribution patterns:
      • Increased constructive edits
      • Increased online contributing
      • Decreased workload
      • Increased edit and contribution quality
      • Increased number of overall contributions via collaboration
      • Reduced mobile editing gap
    • data landscape for guiding contributors
      • Increased data for expanding data-informed support
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed inputs and began outreach to those owners identified in the inventories.
• [MI 2.5] Began deeper dive into the identified documentation spaces.

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Facilitated the working group's first session to develop a strategy-specific action logic model and measurement strategy options for vetting. Strategized protocols for inclusion in the miro board for the second sync session next week to develop measurement strategies for consideration.
• [MI 2.3b] Reviewed inputs to the inventory of experienced active editor definitions and initiated a similar inventory for retained newcomers metric definitions for the phase 2 metrics development priorities.
• [MI 2.5] Reviewed inputs to the inventory of documentation spaces for essential metrics.

Progress update for the week

• Reached out on key channels to learn of other documentation spaces for essential metrics.

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• [MI 2.1b] Scheduled the working group's first two sync sessions for developing a strategy-specific action logic model and measurement strategy options for vetting and strategized protocols for inclusion in the miro board for the kick-off next week.
• [MI 2.3b] Shared a crowd-sourcing request to data slack channels for identifying active approaches to identifying experienced active editors and coordinated for Research support to the phase 2 metrics development priorities.
• [MI 2.5] Reached out on key channels to learn of other documentation spaces for essential metrics.

Progress update for the week (MI - 2)

• Developed initial artifacts for the process including a working group project overview, a miro board for capturing our process, and an outline of the measurement strategy brief we will be working to complete over the course of the 8-week working group. (WE 1.5.2) (see also asana reporting
• Messaged the working group.
• Reached out to Research team about needed support in the implementation design of returning newcomers and active experiences editor metrics as part of Phase 2 developments.
• Began logging known metric documentation pages in a gsheets inventory

Update on progress:

• Began logging known documentation pages in a gsheets inventory

Progress update for the week (MI-2)

• Completed revision code review deployed code for new metrics to gitlab repo.
• Shared communications about the updates to the metrics
• Coordinated on drafting a new hypothesis under WE1.5 to coordinate a shared measurement model to align core and essential contributor metrics to product contributor strategy.

Progress update for the week (MI-2.2)

• Created summary charts for the essential metric reviews.
• Completed code review and revisions for deployment of new metrics.
• Drafted communications about the update to the metrics
• Drafted communications for initiating a small working group to align core and essential contributor metrics to product strategy through a shared measurement model.