Messages should come from the initiating wiki, not just the site name. These are customized to link to policies or help pages or provide warnings.

In T363009#9736975, @Dzahn wrote:

I don't see how you would appropriately control access on a wiki.

Given that any wiki user can login on Phabricator is there a difference I'm missing?

edit: Oh, you don't mean to prevent people from signing the doc, you mean to prevent people from changing the doc that is being signed?

Well, probably by locking down the document page so only admins or stewards can edit it while keeping the signatures on the talk page or something like that? Just like with other important templates etc?

Documentation covering Toolforge job and webservice venvs:

• Help:Toolforge/Python
• Help:Toolforge/Web/Python

(This doesn't need to be a security task.)

If you haven't done so, please contact Trust and Safety at ca(_AT_)wikimedia.org to request removal of 2FA from your account (please send an email using your registered email address of your wiki account).

why we can't do the same signatures on a wiki somewhere

That venv is for python3.7, but you are using python3.11.

In T178700#9728211, @MusikAnimal wrote:

Barring objections, I'm just going to add a check for a minimum of 1,000 edits on the corresponding project.

Sounds good

Or were you suggesting we build a CopyPatrol-specific block function or something?

No, just noting as an example of an inexperienced user reviewing, which I'd like to prevent.

In T362725#9724353, @JJMC89 wrote:

@MusikAnimal Is this another replag issue?

@MusikAnimal Is this another replag issue?

You must wait for a release and then for the image to be updated.

@MusikAnimal If this is due to replag, feel free to close as invalid.

This is expected due to replica database lag from T352010. See https://replag.toolforge.org.

I just undid all reviews by WizardGamer775 (currently 747 edits and 3 months old) directly in the database due to a significant number of them being inaccurate (35%) and/or not having the proper actions taken (20%). Since I have no other recourse to prevent them from reviewing, I've blocked them.

I just undid all reviews by WizardGamer775 (currently 747 edits and 3 months old) directly in the database due to a significant number of them being inaccurate (35%) and/or not having the proper actions taken (20%).

@LSobanski and @thcipriani Would you like me to respond to them or would you like to?

cc Community-Tech in case this is related to the Multiblocks schema migration

This sound like you have some outdated version of pywikibot installed or on your path.

AFAICT, nothing needs to change.

This issue should not be occurring since T333724. The functionality to auto close reports will be moved to the bot, which will update for moves.

The tool-pywikibot/pywikibot-scripts-stable image does not use any config file you have stored on disk. There is one built into the image that you cannot change, so you must use the CLI arguments to specify the site and you will always see family and mylang are not set. and Defaulting to family='wikipedia' and mylang='test'. in the logs.

https://www.ithenticate.com/resources now says

plagiabot is no longer in use.