It's not wrong - so to speak, it's just not unified. No, I have no intention to bother you any more with this detail. Let the status stay closed and resolved.

As I see in other categories, the "mixed up system" is to be the right one:

The setting seems to be implemented successfully. Still there's just one thing I would like to be sure about:

After 1 month of community disscusion being open we've got 6 supporting votes:

I have opened a discussion on sl.wiki to get a community consensus for all Slovene projects. So I left notices on other sister projects and redirected their users to Wikipedia to have whole discussion in one place. Project notices on s, q, b, wikt, v.

@matmarex (just for reminder). Uca-sl is also just fine in my opinion. You can set it in all 6 Slovene projects and "clear sailing ahead".

Ok, no problem. It's just an idea that I believe it would be most practical for common usage.

Still not sure ...

Aha, a link is needed. There indeed are some articles without any link (example).

Well, Wikidata was unable to fix it, so it must be ULS ;-) (Have no idea what that is - United Lua States???)

About "language-specific ordering": Is it possible to arrange for Slovene projects that every single letter of Latin and Latin Extended gets it's own heading?

About Polish examples:

Sorry for assigning my self - my mistake (no programming skills). Here is an example of a list I've made, before I had to remove numbers for the reason of updating:

Oh, this is just a request. Somehow I mixed assigning and subscribing.

Adding a new link to an archived proposal: New label for edits in Recent changes.

Not really. Draft namespace offers just another "classic" page. What I miss is the option to save the article under constrution like in MS Word or Open Office - as many times as the user want, without disturbing Recent changes (and also servers with thousands of saved revisions).

I believe not. That extension is just about redirections and sandbox is still an ordinary page.

@Aklapper I thing that @Nnemo has a different problem:

One more test:

Thanks for creating a new task. Sorry for all inconveniences and misunderstandings too.

Aha, I see. The usage of time zones in preferences is a little bit confusing. Example for Wikibooks:

@Dereckson I checked my preferences:

@Dereckson Hm, test edits on Wikisource and Wikiquote still show me UTC in recent changes. Wikibooks and Wiktionary are ok now.

@Dereckson I've checked the {{LOCALTIME}} on all 6 sl projects:

@Dereckson Yes, Wikiversity works fine, except {{CURRENTTIME}} is still set on UTC. Is it possible to fix that too?

@Dereckson I've left notfications on those three projects (q, b and wikt):

• https://sl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikinavedek:Pod_lipo#Spremenitev_sistemskega_.C4.8Dasa
• https://sl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiknjige:Pod_lipo#Spremenitev_sistemskega_.C4.8Dasa
• https://sl.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wikislovar:Pod_lipo#Spremenitev_sistemskega_.C4.8Dasa

@Dereckson (Forgot to ping you yesterday.)

Wikiquote seems to be using UTC and not Europe/Berlin.

There's still Wiktionary to be put on the list for change.