Done

We can show the timestamp.

Thank You @Dvorapa for the help.

Thank you for updating.

So the documentation need to be updated.

I am happy that you are using this tool and want to have a new feature.
Filtering is a good idea.
However in my small research I couldn't find any direct method where we can filter tweet with a time bracket. Twitter API doesn't have such feature.

Added the feature.

I just commented to give an update. The task was reopened meanwhile. I have not intentionally done that. Sorry for that.

@Mrjohncummings Hi! I have extended the feature so that now users can upload photos from any account. You can test that now.

Yes, it worked. Thanks a lot.

Repositoty:
https://github.com/gyan111/twitter-to-commons

Yes, It is possible. Initially it has built to provide only accounts with free license OTRS taken. We have to analyse cons as well the process. These twitter accounts has OTRS taken and a template where it is clearly specifies the license. Accessing and uploading from any twitter account may lead to vandalism. I can actively add accounts and creating backend where some users with rights can add new accounts.

Thank you for reporting @JJMC89

Thank you

Actually I have built one.

Thank you for the help.

Yes, it is correct. Please create one.

When will I be able to create one? After this getting deployed?

Just a thought.
In my case I am searching for a file on Wikimedia Commons having some search terms and the file should have been uploaded only after 2019 January 1.
Is this case possible with the fix?

Thank You for the information.

That's true. The issue is some of the users are having issue in readability. Like one conjunctions looks different in two different devices.

no

No

Yes you are right.
If I use file_gets_content(), I am getting authorization error.

@Tgr Thanks for explaining.

I still had no luck regarding this.
I am moving the app from my local to toolforge.
Will I be able to download to toolforge repository and upload to commons via URL from there?

@0x010C Thank You Antoine for your respond. I am really stuck and thinking why I used this library as I am in the last stage of the developement and I got to know that this doesn't support file upload by default. Ahhh!

I have checked again and see that if I am changing the file parameter from

@0x010C
I have tried your patch.

By default, Is it possible to upload file using oauthclient-php library? I am stuck here. Unable to upload any file.
Here is the request and response I am getting.

Well we have re licensed the govt official twitter accounts to open license. I am building tool for that.

Sorry for the wrong tag and thank you for the information.

Noted. Thanks @Aklapper @Dinoguy1000

Well it was not an error but warning. It is fixed. Thanks for your comment.

If you have not activated. Please stop the process for now. Until there is more discussion. Please don't activate it now.

If you have not activated. Please stop the process for now. Until there is more discussion. Please don't activate it now.

Can we do this way. -> Enable structured discussion. Not activate in any page. Give admin the power to implement on some pages.

To be honest. There is no active member on that project. Only people checking the page but rarely someone edits there. Odia Wikpedia Community can be considered on this case and they are okay with enabling it. We had a discussion on Odia Wiki and people are agree with it. As I have initiated this on Odia WIkipedia I thought I should also ask for other two projects of Odia Language. It is okay if you enable if there is no problem installing. Or we can close this task as not required now which can be reopened later.

Thank You @Trizek-WMF

@Trizek-WMF do I need to take any action?

Thank You for sharing this idea. I will be posting this message to the community.

Thank You. is there any setting where we can change the title text(the text inside the box where it says start a new topic)? We want that box to say Ask a new question in our language

@Framawiki I am not forcing anyone this is just a proposal. I can create a patch request myself but I am proposing to know the positives and negatives. I respect your views too. My point is why a community who wants to use flow will ask to disable. I want to know the issue. I hope if there will a time come when it needs to be uninstalled then there will be a fix for that too.

If the community admins can have the permission to enable it in pages that will be better also.

@Trizek-WMF No Just enabling it on village pump. The community people who are mainly active on Odia Wikipedia are interested to enable it everywhere though.

Same question from me too. If the community agrees and they are using it then no issue at all. Please go on with enabling it.

Why a wiki needs to uninstall it? @Liuxinyu970226

@Framawiki Thank You for your suggestion.
Is there any negative point of this extension so that it has to be deleted/disabled/uninstalled from a wiki? I am curious to know.

Missed that somehow. Updated the task now.

@Framawiki Those process has already done. Check this https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T110846

Thank you @Trizek-WMF and @Aklapper

Our Community wants the flow to be enabled. Please help

Is this issue occurs in commons also?

I really don't want you to post that on meta(I could have done that also). I just wanted some suggestions and discussions over that.
Please leave this task where it is. Please.

@Liuxinyu970226 Thank you concern.
We had a discussion at our community active members' facebook messenger group(We have a small community so we discuss there and if anything official needed we also discuss it at vp). This task is not very important for us now.

I have posted this because we had a discussion at our community. I will convey the message and post update. here. If the community doesn't want then we can close the task. Anything else you will suggest? @Aklapper

@Liuxinyu970226 Please do not modify the title to something that Odia Wikipedia community do not want/need. You have a valid point but it depends on the community to choose.

Thank you @Trizek-WMF . I have asked fellow Wikimedians to test and give feedback on it. I'll update you once any more information required in any action need to be taken.

@Trizek-WMF It's okay.

@Trizek-WMF Any update?

Sorry I have accidentally marked the task as solved.

Well, @Sipun has asked there for testing. So I think deploying 1, 2 and 3 is fine.

@Liuxinyu970226 Thank you for the insights. I haven't had this knowledge before. I was also not sure if Wikipedia creates language based projects according to ISO 639-1.

I also think the same but it's a hard task to accomplish.
There is a language called Oromo. If in future there is a Wikipedia for Oromo then this condition can be a point.
I have posted this task as a possibility and views about the developers as well as Wikimedia.