@Great_Brightstar :
I used the current (02:11, 21. Mär. 2014 idenical to first) svg:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/5/5a/20140321020128%212014%E5%A4%A7%E8%BF%9E%E7%BB%B4%E5%9F%BA%E4%BA%BA%E6%98%A5%E5%AD%A3%E8%80%83%E5%AF%9F%E5%9B%A2%E6%B5%B7%E6%8A%A5%E7%AB%96%E7%89%88.svg

In T65236#4800144, @Aklapper wrote:

Ah, thanks! I did not compare well, because this is how it looks when I open that image in inkscape-0.92.3-5 using librsvg2-2.44.8-1:

In T193352#4704483, @Aklapper wrote:

@JoKalliauer: I'm not a fan of generic "Update X" tasks without any goal or target, as they easily become neverending catch-all tasks. Which specific version/branch is wanted in this task? 2.42/2.44? Something else?

According to @RazrFalcon in https://github.com/RazrFalcon/svgcleaner/issues/170 this is not a valid SVG 1.1

I think you linked to the right bugreport, but wrong comment:

@Aklapper : According to your comment T193300#4166078

I refered to a different benchmark:
RazrFalcon updates the benchmark more often than Wikimedia updates librsvg (!), therefore I can't see your Problem with: https://github.com/RazrFalcon/resvg/#performance
RazrFalcon might has optimised resvg for his own hardware, and therefore benchmark might be a little different on Wikimedia servers.

Merged from T184369

This seems to be a Duplicate of T64987 as @Glrx linked above?

In T40010#4432901, @Aklapper wrote:

I don't understand. Inkscape is not a rendering library but an image manipulation application that uses librsvg as its rendering library (at least on Fedora).

@Lemzwerg :
Updateting librsvg 2.40.16 to 2.42.3 or higher would fix

• T36947 - Incorrect text positioning in SVG rasterization (scale/transform; font-size; kerning) (fixed in 2.40.19)
• T55899 - SVG masks fail to render (or even display) (fixed in 2.42.3)
• T193352 - Update librsvg to support streamline-emoji (fixed in 2.42.2)
• T207506 - librsvg does not shift from bold to normal font-weight (fixed in librsvg2-2.44.7-1.fc29)
• T64987 - missinterpret quoted font family (fixed in 2.44.0)

resvg is faster and renders better than librsvg, see benchmark: https://github.com/RazrFalcon/resvg/

According to W3C-Validator with DTD 1.1 <style> needs "type" see:

• https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSpecial%3AFilepath%2FWorld_Reserves_to_Production_Crude_Oil.svg&ss=1#result
• https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSpecial%3AFilepath%2FUS_Proved_Crude_Oil_Reserves.svg&ss=1#result

Solved with https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/27655

@Herald Why is it a Security bug? I think @238482n375 is spam?

Is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Librsvg-svgfont-test.svg the same bug? (The picture seems to be rendered correctly (except for the unknown font-characters).

As you can see in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikiImplementationBug_T194192.svg#Test-Area it is a problem of the implementation.

@Aklapper : I repoted it in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues/257

(removed comment, my mistake)

Is T193929 a duplicate?

@Aklapper Thanks for this category, but I would like to find files which are not already listed in a manual category, f.e. such as: File:Stroke-dasharray_chromium_bug_full.svg .
I will take a look at the files in Category:SVG_files_with_errors. I think I will be able to resolve some of them.